BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1011
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 28, 2009

                            ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HEALTH
                                  Dave Jones, Chair
                    AB 1011 (Jones) - As Amended:  April 15, 2009
           
          SUBJECT  :   Office of Health Information Integrity: report.

           SUMMARY  :   Requires the Office of Health Information Integrity  
          (OHII) within the California Health and Human Services Agency  
          (CHHSA) to report to the Legislature, as specified, on the  
          impact of federal law changes related to health care technology  
          and the privacy of health and medical information, including  
          state law changes necessary and appropriate to conform state law  
          to federal changes.  Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Requires OHII to report to the appropriate policy and fiscal  
            committees of the Legislature by April 1, 2010 on the impact  
            of federal changes related to health care technology and the  
            privacy of health and medical information.  

          2)Requires OHII to evaluate and make recommendations for  
            statutory changes to ensure California's medical privacy laws  
            are minimally compliant with or exceed federal privacy laws,  
            including but not limited to, compliance with changes to the  
            federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of  
            1996 (HIPAA), as enacted through the federal American Recovery  
            and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), and that California law  
            is updated to reflect and promote the development and  
            expansion of health information technology (HIT), while  
            safeguarding confidential medical information.

           EXISTING LAW  :  

           1)Establishes OHII within CHHSA to ensure the enforcement of  
            state confidentiality of medical information and to impose  
            administrative fines for the unauthorized use of medical  
            information upon referral from the Department of Public Health  
            (DPH).  

          2)Requires a licensed clinic, health facility, home health  
            agency, or hospice to prevent unlawful or unauthorized access  
            to, and use or disclosure of, patients' medical information,  
            and requires every provider of health care to:









                                                                  AB 1011
                                                                  Page  2

             a)   Prevent the unauthorized access or unlawful access, use,  
               or disclosure of a patient's medical information;
             b)   Monitor employees' electronic access to patient medical  
               information, as specified; and,
             c)   Maintain appropriate administrative, organizational,  
               technical, and physical safeguards, policies, and  
               procedures to ensure the privacy, confidentiality,  
               security, and integrity of medical information that is  
               accessed, maintained, retained, modified, recorded, stored,  
               destroyed, or otherwise used or disclosed.

          3)Requires a health facility to report any unlawful or  
            unauthorized access to or use or disclosure of a patient's  
            medical information (commonly referred to as a "breach" of  
            medical information) to the affected patient or his or her  
            representative and to DPH no later than five days after the  
            unlawful or unauthorized access, use, or disclosure has been  
            detected by the health facility.
          4)Permits DPH, after an investigation, to assess an  
            administrative penalty for a violation of the medical  
            privacy-related protections in 2) above in the amount of  
            $25,000 per patient whose medical information was unlawfully  
            or without authorization accessed, used, or disclosed, and  
            $17,500 per subsequent occurrence.

          5)Prohibits, under the California Confidentiality of Medical  
            Information Act (CMIA), a provider of health care, health care  
            service plan, or health care contractor from disclosing a  
            person's medical information without first obtaining that  
            person's authorization, except as specified.  

          6)Requires under the CMIA, notwithstanding 2) above, a health  
            care provider, health care service plan, or health care  
            contractor to disclose medical information if required by a  
            subpoena, search warrant, or other court order.  Permits a  
            provider, health care service plan, or contractor to disclose  
            information in other specified circumstances, including for  
            purposes of diagnosis or treatment or as necessary to provide  
            billing or other administrative services to the provider or  
            plan.  Prohibits a provider, plan, or contractor from  
            disclosing a person's medical information for marketing  
            purposes, or any other purpose not necessary to provide health  
            care services to the patient, without express authorization  
            from that person.  









                                                                  AB 1011
                                                                  Page  3

          7)Defines, under CMIA:

             a)   "Medical information" as any individually identifiable  
               information, in electronic or physical form, in possession  
               of or derived from a provider of health care, health care  
               service plan, pharmaceutical company, or contractor  
               regarding a patient's medical history, mental or physical  
               condition, or treatment; and,

             b)   "Provider of health care" as a health professional  
               licensed or certified under the Business and Professions  
               Code, including emergency medical technicians, clinics,  
               health dispensaries, and licensed health facilities.

          8)Prohibits under the California Insurance Information and  
            Privacy Protection Act, insurers, including health insurers,  
            from disclosing any personal or privileged individual  
            information collected or received in an insurance transaction,  
            except as specified, including that the information may be  
            disclosed to insurers, agents, or self-insurers if related to  
            an insurance transaction involving the individual, as  
            specified, and to a group policyholder for the purpose of  
            reporting claims experience or conducting an audit of an  
            insurer or agent, as specified.

          9)Under HIPAA, prohibits, with exceptions, covered entities from  
            using or disclosing protected health information (PHI), except  
            pursuant to a written authorization signed by the patient or  
            for treatment, payment, or health care operations, and  
            generally requires a covered entity to make reasonable efforts  
            to limit the use or disclosure of PHI to the minimum necessary  
            to accomplish the intended purpose of the disclosure.  Defines  
            PHI as individually identifiable health information which  
            identifies, or can be used to identify, an individual.  

          10)Under the federal Health Information Technology for Economic  
            and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, enacted as part of ARRA,  
            establishes within the federal Department of Health and Human  
            Services (DHHS) the Office of the National Coordinator for  
            Health Information Technology and requires the Secretary of  
            DHHS to adopt an initial set of standards for HIT and health  
            information exchange (HIE), as specified, by December 31,  
            2009.  In addition, among other changes, requires business  
            associates of covered entities subject to HIPAA, as defined in  
            federal law, (generally health care providers, health plans,  








                                                                  AB 1011
                                                                  Page  4

            and health care clearinghouses, such as billing services) to  
            notify the covered entity following the discovery of a breach  
            of unsecured PHI and requires DHHS to issue interim final  
            regulations for privacy breach notification by entities  
            subject to HIPAA.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :   This bill has not yet been analyzed by a fiscal  
          committee.

           COMMENTS  :   

           1)PURPOSE OF THIS BILL  .  According to the author, this bill is  
            needed to prepare California for enhanced and more widespread  
            adoption of HIT and HIE.  The author points out that the  
            federal HITECH Act, enacted as one component of the ARRA  
            federal economic stimulus plan signed by President Obama on  
            February 17, 2009, establishes a framework for federal policy,  
            standards setting and investment in the development and  
            dissemination of HIT and HIE.  In addition, the author notes,  
            the HITECH Act includes numerous changes to the federal  
            privacy and security provisions of HIPAA, which will have a  
            direct impact on organizations participating in HIE  projects  
            in California.  The author also notes that California already  
            has stronger and more robust state law provisions affecting  
            the disclosure and the protection of individual, private  
            patient information, such as the state breach notification  
            provisions enacted during the 2008 legislative session in AB  
            211 (Jones), Chapter 602, Statutes of 2008, and SB  
            541(Alquist), Chapter 650, Statutes of 2008.  The author  
            contends that in order to continue to protect private patient  
            information, but to also ensure that California can move  
            forward toward wider adoption of HIT, this bill requires OHII  
            to do the legal and policy analysis necessary to make  
            recommendations on the statutory changes to better synchronize  
            state and federal medical privacy laws.

           2)BACKGROUND  .  The federal HITECH Act provides more than $36  
            billion to promote HIT/HIE, including grants, and incentive  
            payments for adoption of electronic health records, chronic  
            disease management systems, and other health-related  
            technologies.  The HITECH Act sets forth a framework for  
            development of federal policy and the expenditure of federal  
            stimulus money to advance the design, development, and  
            operation of a nationwide HIT infrastructure that allows for  
            the electronic use and exchange of information.  The goal of  








                                                                  AB 1011
                                                                  Page  5

            HITECH is to ensure that every person in the United States has  
            an electronic health record by 2014.

          According to a February 2009 policy brief prepared by the  
            California HealthCare Foundation (CHCF), "An Unprecedented  
            Opportunity: Using Federal Stimulus Funds to advance Health IT  
            in California," in addition to creating a new federal policy  
            and standards setting framework, the HITECH Act strengthens  
            the privacy and security provisions of HIPAA in five key  
            areas:  a) Extension of HIPAA to business associates; b)  
            Establishment of a federal security breach notification  
            mandate; c) New restrictions on the use and disclosure of PHI;  
            d) Creation of additional patient rights to allow patients to  
            more fully protect and to obtain their PHI and medical  
            records; and, e) Increased HIPAA enforcement.  As one element  
            of the state HITECH implementation effort, CHCF recommends  
            that OHII disseminate technical guidance to all parties that  
            engage in electronic information exchange to clarify the  
            interplay between California and federal privacy laws and to  
            recommend best practices for facilitating legal compliance.

           3)STATE IMPLEMENTATION  .  On April 22, 2009, CHHSA released a  
            preliminary state plan related to the HIT/HIE elements of  
            federal stimulus, entitled "Health Information Exchange:  
            California's High Level Plan to Secure Federal Stimulus  
            Support."  The CHHSA plan calls for a rapid four month process  
            to convene and gather input from relevant stakeholders;  
            conduct an assessment on existing HIE infrastructure and  
            projects in the state; analyze and develop success criteria,  
            elements of governance, and technical and business  
            requirements related to the advancement of HIE; and the  
            possibility of a state-issued request for proposal to secure  
            and establish a non-profit, state-designated entity to serve  
            as the lead agency in California regarding HIT/HIE as  
            authorized under the HITECH Act.  CHHSA recently appointed a  
            new Deputy Secretary for HIT and a HIE Advisory Board composed  
            of representatives of the Legislature and relevant state  
            agencies, provider, consumer and business stakeholder  
            organizations.

           4)RELATED LEGISLATION  .

             a)   AB 598 (De La Torre) establishes within CHHSA, the  
               California Health Information Network to review and, after  
               public hearings for the purpose of receiving input from all  








                                                                  AB 1011
                                                                  Page  6

               interested parties, recommend adoption of HIE standards to  
               the Governor and the Legislature, and the California Health  
               Information Advisory Board, with specified duties and  
               membership.  AB 598 is scheduled to be heard in the  
               Assembly Health Committee on April 28, 2009.
             b)   SB 270 (Alquist), pending in the Senate, will establish  
               the Health Information Technology Advisory Panel, with  
               specified membership, to advise the Governor and the  
               Legislature on HIT implementation.  

           5)PREVIOUS LEGISLATION  .

             a)   AB 211 (Jones) establishes OHII to ensure the  
               enforcement of state confidentiality of medical information  
               and to impose administrative fines for the unauthorized use  
               of medical information upon referral from DPH, and requires  
               providers of health care to establish and implement  
               appropriate administrative, technical, and physical  
               safeguards to protect the privacy of patient medical  
               information.
             b)   SB 541 (Alquist) increases the maximum penalties levied  
               against hospitals for immediate jeopardy and other  
               specified violations.  Requires specified health facilities  
               to prevent unlawful access to, use, or disclosure of  
               patient medical information; establishes administrative  
               penalties for violations; and requires the patient and DPH  
               to be notified of any unlawful access to, use, or  
               disclosure of a patient's medical information.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          None on file.

           Opposition 
           
          None on file.
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Deborah Kelch / HEALTH / (916) 319-2097