BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1084
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 13, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Kevin De Leon, Chair

                    AB 1084 (Adams) - As Amended:  April 28, 2009 

          Policy Committee:                              Local  
          GovernmentVote:7-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          Yes    Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill provides a time frame for notice relating to an  
          increase or change in development fees levied under the  
          Mitigation Fee Act and establishes procedures for requesting an  
          audit of those fees.  Specifically, the bill:  

          1)Requires a local agency to mail notice of the time and place  
            of the meeting that will be held regarding adoption of a new  
            fee or increasing an existing fee under the Mitigation Fee  
            Act.  

          2)Requires that the mailing, which must be sent 14 days prior to  
            the hearing, include a general explanation of the matter to be  
            considered and a statement of the proposed costs. Also  
            requires that the relevant cost data used to justify the fee  
            be available to the public 10 days prior to the meeting. 

          3)Provides that any written request for mailed notice is valid  
            for one year and the legislative body of the local agency may  
            establish a reasonable annual charge for sending these  
            notices.  

          4)Prohibits any new or increased fee adopted by a local agency  
            that is a city, county, or city and county from going in to  
            effect until 60 days after the final adoption, unless  
            otherwise provided in law. 

          5)States that any person can request an audit in order to  
            determine whether any fee or charge levied by a local agency  
            that is a city, county, or city and county exceeds the amount  
            reasonably necessary to cover the cost of any product, public  








                                                                  AB 1084
                                                                  Page  2

            facility, or service provided.  

          6)Specifies that any costs incurred by a city, county, or city  
            and county by having an independent audit conducted may be  
            recovered from the person who requests the audit.  

          7)Specifies that the oversight of local agency fees is of  
            statewide concern, and therefore, this measure shall apply to  
            charter cities.  

           FISCAL EFFECT
           
          No direct state impact. Potentially significant local costs  
          associated with expanded noticing requirements, not state  
          reimbursable.



           COMMENTS

          1)Purpose.  According to the author, the intent of this measure  
            is to ensure that development impact fees reflect the current  
            cost to cities and counties to construct those public  
            facilities.  The sponsor of the bill (the California Building  
            Industry Association) asserts that "many cities and counties  
            have set their fees based upon costs that existed at the  
            height of the market for both land and construction.  Over the  
            last several years, land and construction costs have declined  
            substantially.  Since that time, many local governments have  
            not revisited those fee calculations, possibly due to the  
            costs associated with a revision to their fee structure.

           2)Background  .  Fees and dedications are one-time exactions  
            collected from a developer as a condition of an approval being  
            granted by a local government.  Impact fees are used to  
            finance the construction of improvements to those public  
            facilities and services that the new development requires.   
            Since the passage of Proposition 13 and other measures  
            limiting local agencies' general revenue sources, local  
            agencies have increasingly required development projects to  
            bear their own costs within the community.

            A major issue involving exactions is the reasonableness of the  
            amounts charged.  In 1987, the California Legislature enacted  
            the Mitigation Fee Act in response to developer concerns that  








                                                                  AB 1084
                                                                  Page  3

            local public agencies were requiring developers to pay for  
            infrastructure improvements that should have been borne by the  
            public as a whole. The Act requires that whenever imposing or  
            increasing a fee as a condition of development, the local  
            public agency must identify the purpose of the fee and the use  
            to which the fee will be put.  The public agency must also  
            explain why there is a reasonable relationship, or nexus,  
            between the fee and the development on which it is imposed.   
            Moreover, fees must not exceed the estimated reasonable cost  
            of providing the service for which the fee was collected.


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Brad Williams / APPR. / (916) 319-2081