BILL ANALYSIS SENATE REVENUE & TAXATION COMMITTEE Senator Lois Wolk, Chair AB 1088 - Fletcher Amended: March 1, 2010 Hearing: June 23, 2010 Fiscal: Yes SUMMARY: Allows Taxpayers to Make Voluntary Contributions to the California Veterans Home Fund on Their State Personal Income Tax Returns. EXISTING LAW allows taxpayers to contribute money to one or more of 15 voluntary contribution funds by checking a box on their state income tax return. California law requires contributions made through check-offs to be made from taxpayers' own resources (not from their tax liability, as is possible on federal tax returns). Check-off amounts may be claimed as charitable contributions on taxpayers' tax returns during the subsequent year. Allows the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) to design tax returns to provide for the designation of contributions to specified funds either on the return itself or on a separate schedule that must be attached to the return. THIS BILL reinstates (under a new name) a voluntary contribution fund (VCF) that fell below minimum contribution requirements and was removed from state income tax returns in 2007. Specifically, this bill: Adds the California Veterans Home Fund to the list of AB 1088 - Fletcher Page 5 voluntary contribution funds included on the personal income tax form. Provides that the new fund will be included on the return upon removal of an existing fund, and will remain on the form for five years unless contributions fall below $250,000 per year. Provides that all moneys transferred to the Fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, shall be allocated as follows: a) To the FTB and the State Controller for reimbursement of costs incurred in administering the check-off; and, b) To the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CDVA) for allocation to the administrators of veterans' homes. Specifically, moneys shall be distributed proportionally to the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Fund of each veteran's home. Provides for the Fund provisions' automatic repeal on either January 1 of the fifth taxable year following the first appearance of the Fund on the personal income tax return, or on January 1 of an earlier year, if FTB estimates that the annual contribution amount will be less than $250,000 or an adjusted amount for subsequent years. Deletes the statutory provisions that authorized the Veterans' Quality of Life Fund check-off, which was also used to fund veterans' homes. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the FTB, this tax check-off will result in an annual revenue loss of approximately $15,000 per year AB 1088 - Fletcher Page 5 beginning in fiscal year (FY) 2011-12. COMMENTS: A. Purpose of the Bill The author provides the following statement: AB 1088 will establish a voluntary contribution fund (The California Veterans Homes Fund) to finance programs and services at the California Veteran's Homes via the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Account provided for by Section 1048 of the Military and Veterans Code. The California Department of Veterans Affairs has a mission "to provide the state's aged and/or disabled veterans with rehabilitative, residential, and medical care and services in a home-like environment at the California Veterans Homes." CDVA operates California Veterans' Homes campuses in Yountville, Barstow, and Chula Vista. Grand openings were held in November for locations at Lancaster and Ventura. Three more homes are planned for West Los Angeles, Homes in Fresno and Redding opened in May and a home planned for West Los Angeles Several activities and programs at the California Veterans Homes are financed through the Morale, Welfare and Recreation Account. State law provides for the Morale, Welfare and Recreation Account to accumulate proceeds from prisoner-of-war license plate issuance revenue, funds derived from golf course green AB 1088 - Fletcher Page 5 fees and range ball fees, donations to the fund, interest earned on invested funds, funds derived from the estates of deceased members, and money and property received by the home from estate assets located outside the home, regardless of amount. AB 1088 would channel money from the California Veterans Homes Fund into the California Veterans Homes' Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Account. With several new Veterans homes set to open in the next few years, the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Account will be split further and stretched to provide for a greater number of veterans. The existing funding sources for the Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Account are not expected to grow significantly. Current fiscal constraints demand alternative methods to augment and maintain funding for veterans. This measure will enhance the Moral, Welfare and Recreation Account, without raising taxes, for the veterans who have given so much of themselves for the security of others. B. Background As noted by the CDVA, the Veterans Home of California is first and foremost a place where veterans come to live. Specifically, "It offers complete medical and dental care amidst the amenities of a small town atmosphere. Residents may participate in on- or off-campus activities, civic affairs or attend veteran's service organization meetings. On campus, residents have the option of participating in AB 1088 - Fletcher Page 5 the Therapeutic Employment Program or by helping other veterans through volunteer service." CDVA currently operates campuses in Yountville (Napa County), Barstow (San Bernardino County), Chula Vista (San Diego County), Lancaster (Los Angeles County), and Ventura (Ventura County). CDVA is also designing and constructing three new homes in West Los Angeles (Los Angeles County), Fresno (Fresno County), and Redding (Shasta County). C. A Returning VCF with a New Name AB 357 (Horton), Chapter 143, Statutes of 2005, authorized the addition of a virtually identical VCF called the Veterans' Quality of Life Fund to augment the amount of money available to the state's veterans' homes. The Veterans' Quality of Life Fund appeared on the 2005 and 2006 tax returns in calendar years 2006 and 2007, respectively. The prior fund received $135,345 in 2006 and $168,146 in 2007. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2007, the fund needed to meet a minimum contribution threshold of $250,000 but failed to do so, and as a result, the fund ceased to be operative. While the Fund has been given a new name, there is little reason to believe it will fare any better than the ill-fated Veterans' Quality of Life Fund, which failed to meet its voluntary contribution threshold. Moreover, the Committee may wish to consider whether AB 2177 creates a precedent of simply re-establishing failed VCFs under new names. Should the Committee approve this measure, it should expect advocates for other previously-expired VCFs to ask for their worthy causes to be resurrected. D. Many Worthy Causes Taxpayers can make voluntary contributions to any of 15 funds listed on the state personal income tax return. The contributions are in addition to any tax liabilities otherwise owed. Thus, they do not directly reduce state taxes otherwise available to support state-funded programs AB 1088 - Fletcher Page 5 in the year in which they are made. However, the amounts are allowed as an itemized deduction for charitable contributions on the subsequent year's income tax return. These voluntary contributions support various purposes, including cancer research, endangered species preservation, and emergency food assistance. Contributions to the VCFs have historically ranged from $250,000 to $800,000 per year. All but one VCF (the California Seniors Special Fund) have sunset dates, and most-except for the California Peace Officer Memorial Foundation Fund and the California Firefighters' Memorial Fund -- must meet a minimum annual contribution to remain on the return. In the past, the Committee has expressed concern that countless worthy causes may be funded by tax check-offs. The Committee has stated that the current check-off system forces them to choose between worthy charities and non-profits for a spot on the tax return. The current system remains subjective and is limited to those organizations that can convince the Legislature to include them on the form. Additionally, taxpayers may currently contribute portions of their refunds to worthy organizations. Taxpayers may also claim a deduction for charitable contributions. The Committee may wish to consider whether the state should use the tax code to encourage contributions to certain charitable organizations. In addition to this bill, the following bills have been introduced this year: AB 658 (Hayashi) would create a VCF designation on the personal income tax return in order for taxpayers to contribute to the California Police Activities Fund (CALPAL). This bill passed the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee June 9th. and is awaiting action in the Senate Appropriations Committee. AB 1008 (Block) would create a VCF designation on the personal income tax form for taxpayers to contribute to the National Guard Education Assistance Fund. This bill is waiting to be heard in the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee. AB 1088 - Fletcher Page 5 AB 1983 (Torrico) would create a VCF designation on the personal income tax return for taxpayers to contribute to the Safely Surrender Babies Fund. This bill is waiting to be heard in the Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee. AB 2017 (Hall) would create a VCF designation on the personal income tax return for taxpayers to contribute to the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA) Youth and Government Fund. This bill is awaiting assignment in the Senate Rules Committee. SB 1076 (Price) would create a VCF designation on the personal income tax return for taxpayers to contribute to the Arts Council Fund. This bill has been held in the Senate Appropriations Committee. Support and Opposition Support: American Legion of California, AMVETS, Department of California, California Association of County Veterans Service Officers, San Diego County Veterans Advisory Council, San Diego County Veterans Service Officers, San Diego United Veterans Council, Vietnam Veterans of America-California State Council, Sacramento Veteran's affiliated Council Oppose: None on file. --------------------------------- Consultant: Meg Svoboda AB 1088 - Fletcher Page 5