BILL ANALYSIS AB 1222 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 21, 2009 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION Anthony Portantino, Chair AB 1222 (Lowenthal) - As Amended: April 13, 2009 SUBJECT : Public postsecondary education: alumni: disclosure. SUMMARY : Removes the January 1, 2011, sunset date on the University of California's (UC) and the California State University's (CSU) ability to participate in affinity programs, thereby allowing UC and CSU to continue to release the names and addresses of their alumni to businesses with whom they have affinity-partner agreements, providing certain privacy requirements are met. EXISTING LAW : 1)Contains a body of statutes, known as the "California Information Practices Act of 1977" (CIPA), which prohibits an individual's name and address from being distributed for commercial purposes or being sold or rented by a state office, officer, department, division, bureau, board, commission or other state agency, unless such action is specifically authorized by law (Civil Code Section 1798.60). 2)Prohibits financial institutions from sharing or selling personally identifiable nonpublic information without obtaining a consumer's consent, known as the California Financial Information Privacy Act (CFIPA), which was established by SB 1 (Speier), Chapter 241, Statutes of 2003. CFIPA controls the disclosure of names, addresses, telephone numbers and electronic addresses by financial institutions within the context of an agreement with an affinity partner. 3)Permits UC, CSU, and Hastings College of the Law (HCL) to release the names and addresses of their alumni to businesses with whom they have affinity-partner agreements, providing certain privacy requirements are met [SB 569 (Torlakson), Chapter 498, Statutes of 2005]. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : This bill is double-referred to the Assembly Judiciary Committee. AB 1222 Page 2 Background : It is common practice for public and private universities to offer benefits and services through affinity partnerships with commercial vendors to alumni as one way to stay connected to their university. However, CFIPA coupled with the prohibition on the distribution of personal information under CIPA, resulted in ambiguity about the authority of agencies subject to the CIPA to enter into affinity agreements with financial institutions. SB 569 addressed this ambiguity as follows: 1)Permits UC, CSU and HCL to distribute the name, addresses and email addresses of their respective alumni for the following purposes: to provide informational materials relating to the college or university, to provide commercial opportunities, and to promote and support the educational mission of the college or university. 2)Requires the contracts with businesses who receive the alumni information from UC, CSU, or HCL to: a) Maintain the confidentiality of the names and addresses of the alumni; UC, CSU, and/or HCL must retain the right to approve or reject any purpose for which the information is to be used; b) Allow UC, CSU, and/or HCL to review the text of mailings; and, c) Prohibit the business from using the information for any purposes other than those specifically allowed in the bill. 3)Prohibits the disclosure of the personal information of a) alumni who have directed the trustees or an alumni association not to disclose their names and addresses, b) current students at the colleges or university, and c) alumni who as students indicated that they did not want their information disclosed. 4)Requires the institutions to provide notice to the alumni, as specified, and requires the instructions to provide alumni with multiple opportunities to opt not to have the alumni association share their information with the affinity partners. What are affinity programs ? An affinity program provides a AB 1222 Page 3 means whereby a tax-exempt organization may generate funds by allowing the use of its name and/or logo to endorse products or services. In the case of UC and CSU, through partnerships with commercial entities, affinity programs allow alumni organizations to offer a variety of financial products to graduates and alumni members, such as group rates and discounts for home and auto insurance, mortgage programs, credit cards, and other credit lines. In return for allowing access to alumni association mailing lists, the affinity partner pays a fee to the campus association. Privacy protections : As noted previously, SB 569 requires a contractual agreement with a commercial entity that, in essence, restricts the use of the data to purposes that afford alumni, governing body members, and alumni associations with commercial opportunities that provide a benefit to them. In addition, alumni must be given the opportunity to "opt out" of the sharing their private information, and all affinity partnerships contain confidentiality clauses that prohibit misuse of alumni information. Finally, under no circumstances are campuses allowed to share student information with affinity partners. Staff is unaware of any problem or concerns that have arisen related to UC's or CSU's affinity programs. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support California Postsecondary Education Commission University of California Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by : Sandra Fried / HIGHER ED. / (916) 319-3960