BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1229
Page 1
Date of Hearing: January 21, 2010
ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
Kevin De Leon, Chair
AB 1229 (Evans) - As Amended: January 4, 2010
Policy Committee: JudiciaryVote:9-0
(Consent)
Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program:
No Reimbursable:
SUMMARY
This bill clarifies a recently-enacted Judicial Council
program-authorizing the collection of reimbursements for counsel
appointed by the court to represent parents or their children in
dependency cases-to allow the court to designate a financial
officer from the county to determine parents' liability for
reimbursements.
FISCAL EFFECT
Negligible fiscal impact.
COMMENTS
Background and Purpose . Last year, AB 131 (Evans)/Chapter 413
established a program to reimburse courts for the costs of
providing counsel to parents and their children in dependency
actions, if the parents have the financial ability to do so.
Current law also allows a financial evaluation officer to make
an evaluation of a parent's financial condition to determine if
reimbursement of any dependency counsel costs are appropriate.
According to the author, this bill clarifies current law so the
courts can either identify a financial evaluation officer on
their own staff, or, with the county's agreement, use the
county's financial evaluator. According to the Judicial Counsel
(sponsor), AB 131 could otherwise be interpreted to require the
courts to obtain the county's agreement in order to create a
court financial evaluation officer. The Judicial Council
believes the current language could create unnecessary work for
both sides to come to such an agreement.
AB 1229
Page 2
Analysis Prepared by : Chuck Nicol / APPR. / (916) 319-2081