BILL ANALYSIS AB 1351 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 27, 2009 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES Nancy Skinner, Chair AB 1351 (Blakeslee) - As Amended: April 13, 2009 SUBJECT : Renewable energy resources SUMMARY : Revises certification conditions for hydroelectric facilities eligible for the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) to permit certification from an agency other than the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), such as if the facility is located in another state. EXISTING LAW generally limits RPS eligibility of hydroelectric facilities to facilities 30 megawatts or less, but permits new incremental increases in electricity production from facilities over 30 megawatts, if the increase results from efficiency improvements and meets specified water quality criteria, including that the facility has, with the last 15 years, received an exemption or certification from the SWRCB pursuant to Section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act (water quality standards applicable to hydroelectric facilities). The requirement for SWRCB certification acts as a prohibition on out of state facilities, which are not under SWRCB jurisdiction. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : This bill is intended to accommodate RPS eligibility for efficiency improvement at large hydroelectric facilities located outside California, which can't meet the existing requirement for SWRCB certification because they lie outside SWRCB's jurisdiction. This may provide an additional incentive for facilities to undertake efficiency improvement and increase the availability of resources for compliance with California's RPS. However, it may also attract "free riders" i.e., facilities in the Northwest that may already undertake routine efficiency improvements for other reasons. An influx of RPS-eligible hydropower from out-of-state would diminish development of new renewable energy facilities in California. In addition, out-of-state facilities present a problem regarding the ability to enforce California (or comparable) water quality standards because other states may not have comparable standards. If it AB 1351 Page 2 is intended to permit eligibility only for facilities owned by utilities subject to the RPS, the author and the committee may wish to consider adopting a clarifying amendment to that effect to limit the scope of the bill. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support Pacific Power Sierra Pacific Power Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by : Lawrence Lingbloom / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092