BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1386
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 20, 2009

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION
                                   Mike Eng, Chair
                   AB 1386 (Hayashi) - As Amended:  April 13, 2009
           
          SUBJECT  :  State Route 84 and State Route 238:  local alternative  
          transportation improvement program 

           SUMMARY  :   Modifies provisions of existing law governing  
          development of a local alternative transportation improvement  
          program (LATIP) in the State Route 84 and SR 238 corridors.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Expands the uses for which proceeds from the sale of surplus  
            property in the SR 238 corridor can be allocated to include  
            improvements on any highways, not just state highways.  

          2)Adds provisions governing the accounting of revenue from the  
            sale of surplus property in the SR 84and SR 238 corridors.  

          3)Provides for the relinquishment of segments of SR 95, SR 185,  
            and SR 238 to the City of Hayward.  

          EXISTING LAW  :  

          4)Grants local authorities, acting jointly with transportation  
            planning agencies, authority to develop and file with the  
            California Transportation Commission (CTC), LATIPs to address  
            transportation problems county that were to be served by  
            construction of freeways on SR 84 and SR 238.  

          5)Dictates that priority for funding in the LATIPs is to go to  
            projects in the local voter-approved transportation tax  
            measure.  

          6)Grants CTC final authority over the content and approval of  
            LATIPs for SR 84 and SR 238 and prohibits it from approving  
            any such program submitted after January 1, 2010.  

          7)Directs the proceeds from the sale of excess properties, less  
            specified costs, to be allocated by CTC to fund the approved  
            LATIP.  These proceeds are exempt from formulae, such as the  
            north/south split and county shares, that generally govern the  
            distribution of capital improvement dollars for  








                                                                  AB 1386
                                                                  Page  2

            transportation.  These proceeds are restricted, however, for  
            state highway purposes.  

          8)Statutorily identifies state highway system routes; defines  
            "state highway" as any roadway that is acquired, laid out,  
            constructed, improved, or maintained as a state highway  
            pursuant to constitutional or legislative authorization.  

          9)Provides for the expansion or deletion of the state highway  
            system through a process whereby CTC makes a finding that it  
            is in the best interest of the state to include or delete a  
            specified portion of roadway to the system.  

          10)Provides for the relinquishment of a portion of state highway  
            to a city or county under an agreement between the local  
            jurisdiction and the Department of Transportation (Caltrans)  
            when an act of the Legislature has deleted the portion of  
            highway from the state highway system.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  Unknown

           COMMENTS  :  In the late 1960s, Caltrans initiated a project to  
          build a freeway in the SR 238 corridor.  Caltrans purchased  
          hundreds of parcels for right-of-way for the freeway.  The  
          project stalled in the 1970s, and by the start of the 1980s, the  
          project had encountered enough delays and problems to be  
          considered infeasible by most interested parties.  SB 1711  
          (Holmdahl) Chapter 799, Statutes of 1982, allowed local  
          transportation authorities to develop an alternative plan to the  
          SR 238 project and required them to submit that plan to CTC by  
          January 1, 1986, after which the commission was barred from  
          approving any alternative plan.  SB 296 (Lockyer) Chapter 494,  
          Statutes of 1985, extended the deadline to January 1, 1988.   
          Both these deadlines went unmet.  

          SB 509 (Figueroa) Chapter 611, Statutes of 2004, revived the  
          LATIP process and established a new deadline of January 1, 2010.  
           AB 1462 (Torrico) Chapter 619, Statutes of 2005, added SR 84 to  
          provisions providing for the LATIP in Alameda County.  Last  
          year's SB 791 (Corbett) Chapter 705, Statutes of 2008 authorized  
          the use of revenues from sales of excess properties for projects  
          in the local alternative transportation improvement program that  
          are also in the local voter-approved transportation sales tax  
          measure, subject to approval by the Department of   
          Transportation.  








                                                                  AB 1386
                                                                  Page  3


          According to the author, in addition to providing for the  
          relinquishment of state highway segments, provisions in the bill  
          establishing an accounting mechanism will ensure the proceeds of  
          the property sales can be tracked.  

          This bill is the next step toward closing out these obsolete  
            state highway projects and moving forward toward meeting local  
            housing and transportation needs.  

           Author's amendment  :  The author has requested to take amendments  
          in committee to add a provision that proposed highway  
          relinquishments be conditioned on Caltrans and the City of  
          Hayward agreeing to the terms of the relinquishment.  
           
          REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          None on file

           Opposition 
           
          None on file
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :   Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093