BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 1422|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 1422
          Author:   Bass (D)
          Amended:  8/25/09 in Senate
          Vote:     27 - Urgency

           
           SENATE REVENUE & TAXATION COMMITTEE  :  6-1, 8/26/09
          AYES:  Wolk, Alquist, Ashburn, Florez, Padilla, Wiggins
          NOES:  Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  11-1, 8/27/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza,  
            Price, Wolk, Wyland, Yee
          NOES:  Walters
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  Not relevant


           SUBJECT  :    Health Care Programs:  California Children and  
          Families Actof 1998

           SOURCE  :     Author


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides that Medi-Cal managed care  
          plans would be subject to the gross premium taxes, which  
          are levied pursuant to section 28 of article XIII of the  
          California Constitution.  This bill increases, in specific  
          circumstances, the premiums paid by families for children  
          enrolled in the Healthy Families Program.  This bill also  
          provides administrative rules for distributing the  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1422
                                                                Page  
          2

          additional revenue.

           ANALYSIS  :    

           I.  Gross Premiums Tax on Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans
           
          This bill subjects Medi-Cal managed care plans to the gross  
          premiums tax assessed on insurers pursuant to section 28 of  
          article VIII of the California Constitution. Existing law  
          provides that insurers, generally defined as property  
          insurance, life insurance, casualty insurance and some  
          preferred provider organizations and point of service  
          plans, are assessed a 2.35 percent tax on their annual  
          gross premiums.  The tax is collected by the Department of  
          Insurance and deposited into the state General Fund.  It is  
          assessed in lieu of all other taxes with only specific  
          exemptions such as for taxes upon real estate and vehicle  
          license fees, among others. Generally, these insurers are  
          regulated by the Department of Insurance.

          Health care service plans that are regulated by the  
          Department of Managed Health Care, including Medi-Cal  
          managed care plans, are generally not subject to the gross  
          premiums tax.

          This bill requires Medi-Cal managed care plans to make  
          prepayments four times each year of 25 percent of the  
          annual amount of the tax for the current calendar year, but  
          would provide that no prepayments would be required to be  
          paid prior to the effective date of these provisions.

          Currently, Medi-Cal managed care plans, which operate in 23  
          of California's 58 counties, are subject to a quality  
          improvement fee (QIF) of 5.5 percent of their annual  
          revenues.  In fiscal year 2008-2009, it is estimated that  
          the QIF revenues netted $238.8 million General Fund.  
          Existing state and federal law require that Medi-Cal  
          managed care plans be paid actuarially sound rates. This  
          type of calculation takes into consideration the costs the  
          plans incur and the populations that they serve.  Changes  
          in federal law have resulted in the discontinuation of the  
          QIF on October 1, 2009. 

          Existing federal Medicaid law permits states to assess  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1422
                                                                Page  
          3

          provider taxes to be used as non-federal funds to draw down  
          federal Medicaid matching funds. However, there are  
          specific requirements to a provider tax, including that the  
          tax be "broad-based" and uniformly imposed throughout a  
          jurisdiction and that payers of the tax may not be "held  
          harmless" for their portion of the tax. The current QIF on  
          Medi-Cal managed care plans would have violated those  
          provisions.

          Because the gross premiums tax is an existing tax and on a  
          broad group of insurers, it can be extended to Medi-Cal  
          managed care plans without the necessity of meeting federal  
          provider tax requirements.  Dental managed care plans would  
          be exempt from the gross premiums tax.  They are also  
          currently exempt from paying the QIF.

          This bill provides that the total revenues derived from  
          this tax on Medi-Cal managed care plans be continuously  
          appropriated as follows: 38.41 percent to the Department of  
          Health Care Services (DHCS) for Medi-Cal and 61.59 percent  
          to the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board (MRMIB) for the  
          Healthy Families Program.  The total revenues are expected  
          to total $157 million on an annual basis. $60 million  
          General Fund, the 38.41 percent of the total revenues, and  
          its federal match would be paid to DHCS, and the remaining  
          $97 million, the 61.59 percent of the total revenues, would  
          go to MRMIB annually.  The MRMIB portion would then serve  
          as the 35 percent non-federal match to draw down 65 percent  
          in Children's Health Insurance Program funds.  This tax  
          would be imposed on Medi-Cal managed care plans' annual  
          revenues beginning January 1, 2009.  The tax provisions of  
          this bill sunsets January 1, 2011. 

          State Medi-Cal monies are generally matched dollar for  
          dollar by the federal government. However, as a result of  
          the passage of the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act  
          in February of 2009, the Federal Medical Assistance  
          Percentage (FMAP) increased from 50 percent to 61.59  
          percent.  Thus, retroactively from October 1, 2008 through  
          December 31, 2010, the federal government would pay for  
          approximately 61.59 percent and the state General Fund  
          would pay for 38.41 percent of benefit-related Medi-Cal  
          expenditures.  After December 31, 2010, the FMAP reduces to  
          50 percent federal funds, 50 percent General Fund. 

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1422
                                                                Page  
          4


          The provisions related to assessing the gross premiums tax  
          on Medi-Cal managed care plans would have no force or  
          effect if specified conditions occur, including the lack of  
          federal approval and federal matching funds, the revenues  
          raised by this tax were used for purposes other than those  
          identified in this bill, and if a judicial determination  
          that this methodology is invalid, unlawful, or in violation  
          of federal regulations or that this tax is required to be  
          in lieu of all other taxes that insurers must ordinarily  
          pay.

          This bill provides that is there is a delay in the  
          calculation of rates by DHCS, a Medi-Cal managed care plan  
          would be assessed the amount it would be required to pay,  
          but would not be required to actually pay the tax until the  
          rates are paid. DHCS would have the authority to  
          retroactively increase rates and make payments to plans.

           II.  California Children and Families Commission Funds  
          Flexibility
           
          This bill permits the California Children and Families  
          Commission, which was created by Proposition 10 of 1998 and  
          is funded by a tax equivalent to $0.50 on a pack of  
          cigarettes, to transfer any unneeded funds to its  
          Unallocated Account from the Mass Media Communications, the  
          Education, the Child Care and the Research and Development  
          Accounts upon approval by the commission.

          This bill declares legislative intent that these changes  
          further the purpose of the California Children and Families  
          Act of 1998.

          On August 13, 2009, the commission approved the transfer of  
          $81.4 million from the commission to the Healthy Families  
          Program to provide health care coverage for children 0-5  
          years of age until June 2010.

          This bill states legislative intent that the Director of  
          Finance would be required to make the necessary budgetary  
          adjustments to allow the expenditure of funds allocated by  
          the commission and would require that, within 30 days of  
          making any budgetary adjustments, the Director of Finance  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1422
                                                                Page  
          5

          notify the Joint Legislative Budget Committee and the  
          fiscal and appropriate policy committees of the Legislature  
          of those actions.

           III.  Healthy Families Program Premiums Increase
           
          In the fiscal year 2009-2010 budget, the Healthy Families  
          Program was cut $194 million in General Funds.  The program  
          provides comprehensive health care coverage to children who  
          are ineligible for free Medi-Cal and whose family income is  
          equal to or less than 250 percent of the federal poverty  
          level (FPL) and is administered by the MRMIB.  There are  
          approximately 950,000 children enrolled in the program and  
          MRMIB estimated that the budget cuts would necessitate a  
          freeze in enrollment and the disenrollment of approximately  
          650,000 enrollees, beginning in October 1, 2009.  In  
          addition to this measure and the award of $81.4 million  
          from the California Children and Families Commission, MRMIB  
          plans to make programmatic changes to produce savings that  
          would eliminate the remaining budget shortfall of  
          approximately $15.6 million.  During fiscal years 2009-2010  
          and 2010-2011, this bill allows MRMIB to adopt emergency  
          regulations to modify health, dental, and vision benefits  
          or program requirements and operations.  Healthy Families  
          Program premiums may only be increased through statute;  
          they cannot be changed by an action of the board nor  
          through regulations. 

          Commencing November 1, 2009, this bill increases premiums  
          paid by families of enrollees in the Healthy Families  
          Program, as specified, with family incomes between 150  
          percent and 250 percent of the FPL and would require the  
          program to notify families whose premiums would increase.  
          The premium changes would be as follows:

          For the lower cost Family Value Package:

          1.150-200 percent FPL:  change from $9 to $13 per child per  
            month with a family maximum per month change of $27 to  
            $39 per month;
          2.200-250 percent FPL:  change from $14 to $21 per child  
            per month with a family maximum change of $42 to $63 per  
            month.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1422
                                                                Page  
          6

          For the higher cost Family Value Package:

          1.150-200 percent FPL:  change from $12 to $16 per child  
            per month with a family maximum per month change of $36  
            to $48 per month;
          2.200-250 percent FPL:  change from $17 to $24 per child  
            per month with a family maximum per month change of $51  
            to $71 per month.

          Premiums for enrollees with family incomes below 150  
          percent of the FPL would remain unchanged.

          MRMIB estimates a savings of at least $5.5 million in  
          fiscal year 2009-2010 assuming a November 1, 2009,  
          effective date for the higher cost package based on MRMIB  
          data presented at its August 20, 2009, board meeting.  
          Savings associated with premium increases associated with  
          the lower cost package are unknown.  Ongoing savings would  
          be of a similar magnitude.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  Yes   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2009-10     2010-11     
           2011-12   Fund  
          Gross premiums           ($157,000)     ($78,500)$0General
          tax revenue

          Payment to Medi-Cal      $60,000   $30,000$0General

          Payment to Healthy       $97,000   $48,500$0General
          Families Program

          Healthy Families Program (at least $5,500) (at least  
          $5,500) (at least $5,500) General
          Premium increases
          (revenue)

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/2/09)


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1422
                                                                Page  
          7

          100% Campaign
          Blue Cross
          California Assoc. of Health Plans
          California Medical Association
          California Primary Care Association
          California State Assoc of Counties
          City and County of San Francisco
          County Health Executive
          Department of Health Care Services
          Health Access
          Health Net
          Insure the Uninsured Project
          Kaiser
          Local Health Plans of CA
          Western Center on Law and Poverty

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The California Association of  
          Health Plans (CAHP) states that, "The current fiscal crisis  
          in California has led to substantial budget cuts that have  
          made it difficult to ensure health coverage for children.   
          Unless action is taken, thousands of children will stand in  
          line for health insurance or lose their health benefits  
          entirely.  CAHP and its member plans have made coverage for  
          children a top priority, which is why we are a part of a  
          solution that can help prevent disenrollment in Healthy  
          Families.

          "AB 1422 is part of an overall approach involving  
          contributions from various sources, including the  
          involvement of health plans.  The revenues collected by  
          this measure will allow for California to take advantage of  
          both the enhanced FMAP available from the federal  
          government as well as the existing 2-1 match in the Healthy  
          Families Program.  Importantly, consumers in our commercial  
          markets will not see or be impacted by the tax proposed in  
          this bill."

          Kaiser Permanente writes that "?we support your AB 1422,  
          which contains various provisions to continue the Healthy  
          Families program at current eligibility levels for the  
          2009-10 fiscal year, including application of the current  
          gross premiums tax to Medi-Cal managed care plans for the  
          purpose of supporting state health programs.


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 1422
                                                                Page  
          8

          "We are pleased to support AB 1422 because it provides  
          critically needed resources to continue existing health  
          programs for California children.  The bill is also  
          straightforward in an important respect:  it includes a tax  
          under California's Constitution.  We applaud your  
          willingness to be candid about this reality.  Importantly,  
          the measure represents a consensus among the  
          Administration, the industry subject to the tax, and other  
          stakeholders.

          "AB 1422 requires a two-thirds vote of the California  
          legislature.  Because it is narrowly crafted, serves a  
          compelling need, and has the unanimous support of the  
          industry that would pay the tax, we believe it deserves  
          such support."


          DLW:nl  9/2/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****























                                                           CONTINUED