BILL ANALYSIS AB 1530 Page 1 Date of Hearing: August 26, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON REVENUE AND TAXATION Anthony Portantino, Chair AB 1530 (Skinner) - As Amended: June 30, 2010 Majority vote. Fiscal committee. SUBJECT : Tax Administration: Franchise Tax Board: collection of restitution orders. SUMMARY : Provides the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) with express authority to collect restitution orders awarded to the FTB in criminal proceedings in the same manner and with the same priority as tax liabilities. Specifically, this bill : 1)Allows FTB to collect restitution orders or any other amounts awarded to FTB by a court of competent jurisdiction in criminal proceedings in the same way that FTB collects tax liabilities. 2)Specifies that the provisions of the Personal Income Tax (PIT) Law, the Administration of the Franchise and Income Tax Law, the Taxpayers' Bill of Rights, and the Corporation Tax (CT) Law shall apply to amounts collected under this bill, unless a conflict exists. 3)Allows taxpayers, notwithstanding the payment priority established under existing law, to designate voluntary restitution payments as payments for a PIT liability or amounts authorized to be collected by the FTB under this bill. 4)Provides that for all amounts authorized to be collected that are due and payable to the FTB before, on, or after January 1, 2011, all of the following shall apply: a) Interest shall accrue for the collection amounts at the rate of restitution orders (10% per year) or tax penalties, whichever is greater, from and after the date the amounts are established on the records of the FTB; b) Collection amounts shall not be bound by statutes of limitation; AB 1530 Page 2 c) The FTB may file Notices of State Tax Lien at any time until the amount is paid in full; and, d) The FTB may retain an amount to compensate for its investigatory costs out of the restitution amount. EXISTING LAW : 1)Allows all persons who suffer losses as a result of criminal activity to seek and secure restitution from the persons convicted of the crimes causing the losses. 2)Authorizes the FTB to administer the PIT Law and CT Law and to refer cases for criminal prosecution for certain offenses. Provides that the court may award restitution for the following crimes: a) Failure to file returns; b) Forging a spouse's signature; c) False, fraudulent, or deceptive conduct; d) Tax evasion; e) Conversion of a taxpayer refund by a tax preparer; and, f) Employer's failure to collect or deposit tax. 3)Authorizes the FTB to file an action in civil court for a civil judgment under the Code of Civil Procedure. 4)Allows the FTB to collect criminal restitution fines under the Court Ordered Debt (COD) program, in addition to fines, state or local penalties, and forfeitures, in amounts that exceed $100 in the aggregate and are more than 90 days delinquent. Restitution orders must be imposed by a governmental entity that: a) Is authorized to collect on behalf of the state or victim; b) Is responsible for distributing the restitution order collections; and, AB 1530 Page 3 c) Ensures that it coordinates with any other related collection activities that may occur during that debt. 5)Allows FTB to collect these amounts using wage garnishments, bank levies, and Notices of State Tax Liens when an amount is due and payable, and the taxpayer has not complied with the obligation to pay the amount due. Garnishments and levies are treated like warrants issued as part of the civil process. 6)Establishes a priority for payment of debts when multiple debts are owed by the same taxpayer and are collected by the FTB in the following order: a) Child support delinquencies; b) Payment of taxes, additions to tax, penalties and interest; c) Delinquent wages; d) Delinquent vehicle license fees; e) Amounts due under the COD program; f) Amounts referred for collection under the Cal-OSHA targeted inspection program; g) Delinquent penalties collected for the Department of Industrial Relations; h) Delinquent fees collected for the Department of Industrial Relations; and, i) Delinquencies referred by the Student Aid Commission. FISCAL EFFECT : The FTB staff estimates that, as a result of this bill, the collections by FTB will increase by $50,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2009-10, $100,000 in FY 2010-11, and $100,000 in FY 2011-12. COMMENTS : 1)Author's Statement . The author states that, "This bill would provide the FTB express authority to collect orders of AB 1530 Page 4 restitution awarded to the department for the State in criminal proceedings in the same manner as tax debts. Authorizing the FTB to use its efficient electronic tax collection tools would improve the process of collecting orders of restitution awarded to the FTB and ensure prompt follow up on debts by allowing the tax collection system to monitor accounts for assets that could lead to satisfaction of the debt. Orders of restitution consist primarily of the taxes, penalties, and interest owed to the FTB and should be collected as such." 2)The Purpose of this Bill . According to the sponsor, this bill is intended to improve the collection process for orders of restitution awarded to the FTB in criminal proceedings. 3)Background . Under existing law, the FTB, like any other victim, can seek restitution for economic losses incurred as a result of a specified crime. Generally, the economic loss suffered by FTB in criminal proceedings is the amount of state income tax, plus any applicable penalties, interest, and costs of investigation and/or prosecution, that the person convicted of a crime failed to pay. Since an order of restitution issued by a court is not a tax or a tax penalty, it is unclear whether the FTB may use its existing administrative tax collection tools in collecting that order. Currently, the FTB could collect its restitution orders either via the COD provisions or as a civil money judgment using collection remedies available under the Code of Civil Procedure. Restitution orders awarded to FTB in federal cases do not meet the requirements for referral under the COD provisions. Furthermore, as pointed out by the FTB in its analysis of this bill, the FTB does not use COD to collect any of its orders of restitution because of the following two reasons. First of all, the billing notices that the FTB issues to taxpayers who owe both tax and restitution would be inaccurate because the balances are maintained on two separate systems - a billing system and a collection system. The collection of a restitution order requires higher level of collection expertise than the average COD account that relies primarily on automated processes. Secondly, the COD system does not assess interest; it is the state agency that refers the debt to the FTB for collection that calculates the amount of accrued interest and provides this information to the FTB. AB 1530 Page 5 An existing process for enforcing a civil money judgment is generally time consuming and cumbersome. Those statutory procedures can delay the collection of the restitution orders and the FTB must rely on the availability of external resources to collect amounts owed as a civil money judgment. Depending on the nature of the assets involved, the civil process can take anywhere from 90 days to one year from the date of seizure to the date of the auction to complete. The FTB estimates that, annually, it receives approximately 40 criminal orders of restitution valued at $15 million. AB 1530 would expressly authorize the FTB to collect restitution orders, which are awarded to the FTB by a court in criminal proceedings, in the same manner and with the same priority as regular tax liabilities. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support Franchise Tax Board (sponsor) Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by : Oksana G. Jaffe / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098