BILL ANALYSIS AB 1648 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 19, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION Bonnie Lowenthal, Chair AB 1648 (Jeffries) - As Amended: April 14, 2010 SUBJECT : Driver's license: firefighters SUMMARY : Sets forth new driver's license requirements for firefighters operating firefighter equipment. Specifically, this bill : 1)Provides that a regularly organized, official fire department is not required to participate in the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) Employer Pull Notice (EPN) Program. If the fire department does participate in the EPN Program, program fees will be waived. 2)Exempts firefighting equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating over 26,000 pounds and operated by a person who is required to have a firefighter endorsement from the list of vehicles for which a person must obtain a commercial driver's license to operate. 3)Requires a driver to obtain a firefighter endorsement and obtain and maintain a class A, Class B, or class C license to operate large firefighting equipment, unless it is for training purposes during a non-emergency and under the direct supervision of a properly licensed and authorized fire department employee. 4)Sets forth requirements that a driver must meet to obtain a firefighter endorsement, including: a) Provide proof to DMV of current employment or registration as a volunteer with a fire department by providing a letter or other indication from the chief of the fire department; and, b) Pass a written commercial driver's license examination. 5)Provides that these requirements apply only if both the following conditions exist: AB 1648 Page 2 a) The equipment is operated by either a professional or volunteer firefighter of a legitimate fire department, as specified; and, b) The firefighting equipment (over 26,000 gross vehicle weight rating) is used to travel to and from an emergency or to transport equipment used in an emergency, as specified. 6)Prohibits DMV from imposing fees for firefighter endorsements, unless the endorsement is added to an existing license, for which the driver is required to pay a duplicate license fee. 7)Provides that these provisions apply to licenses obtained after January 1, 2011. 8)Repeals existing provisions governing issuance of a restricted firefighter driver's license. EXISTING LAW: 9)Establishes an Employer Pull Notice (EPN) Program in DMV to provide employers and regulatory agencies with a means of promoting driver safety through an ongoing review of driver records. 10)Requires employers of commercial drivers to participate in the EPN Program, which provides employers with information regarding a driver's current public record as recorded by DMV and any subsequent convictions, failures to appear, accidents, driver's license suspensions, driver's license revocations, or other actions taken against the person's driving privilege. 11)Sets forth other procedures and requirements for the EPN Program. 12)Sets forth testing requirements for DMV's commercial driving skills test, including an actual demonstration of the applicant's ability to exercise ordinary and reasonable control in operating a motor vehicle in the type and/or combination for which he or she is seeking a license. 13)Prohibits any person from operating firefighting equipment AB 1648 Page 3 unless that person has a valid driver's license for the appropriate class of equipment. 14)Authorizes DMV to issue a restricted driver's license for an appropriate class of firefighting equipment. 15)Provides for an Employer Testing Program (ETP). The ETP is a third-party testing program in which DMV allows employers of commercial drivers to conduct the drive test portion for the DMV's commercial driver's licensing requirements for class A, class B, and non-commercial firefighter restricted license. ETP requires an employer-employee relationship in order to conduct third party testing. With the DMV's authorization, any public or private company may participate in ETP. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : According to DMV, their commercial driver's license ETP is about to undergo significant changes to conform to new federal regulations. Left unaddressed, the burdens this will place on fire departments will cripple their ability to operate this program. These changes will force departments to send new drivers to commercial drive test facilities run by the DMV. Unfortunately, at the same time that these new, more rigorous testing requirements come about, DMV reports it is reducing the number of drive test facilities. Specifically, it indicates that statewide, the number of facilities is expected to shrink from 30 to 8. Fire departments around the state, particularly those in rural areas, are concerned that it is becoming both extremely expensive and strategically difficult to service the needs of California communities because they will be hampered in obtaining the required commercial driver's licenses for both professional and volunteer firefighting staffs. They cite as an example of the difficulties the fact that to complete the skills test, a licensed firefighter with a commercial license must drive the firefighting equipment to a DMV testing site, sometimes hours away, with the new driver who is to be tested. As a result, two employees and a large piece of firefighting equipment are essentially out of service for the day. As if this was not costly enough, rural volunteer fire departments face extraordinary difficulties because their driver's usually have to take time off of work for the test. AB 1648 Page 4 According to the author, this bill is a proactive approach toward resolving the dilemma posed by these rapidly approaching problems. The bill removes the firefighter restricted license program from DMV's commercial driver's license program (as authorized under federal law) and creates new testing requirements. New firefighter drivers will be trained by their departments and will be required to pass a written DMV test. It is important to note that the required training standards are not impacted by AB 1648. The author believe that this bill makes it easier for fire departments to train and test their firefighters without the onerous logistical requirements of the commercial employer training program and without jeopardizing the integrity of the testing. The author reports that this bill is designed to provide a cost-effective means for meeting the licensure needs of our state's firefighters and represents the product of over nine months of stakeholder meetings, negotiations and statewide gatherings with fire officials. In addition, the author has met with DMV representatives repeatedly and DMV has, in turn, been responsive and supportive of the efforts to reform the firefighter licensing system. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support None on file Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by : Janet Dawson / TRANS. / (916) 319-2093