BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 1683| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ CONSENT Bill No: AB 1683 Author: Torres (D) Amended: 5/28/10 in Assembly Vote: 21 SENATE EDUCATION COMMITTEE : 8-0, 6/30/10 AYES: Romero, Huff, Alquist, Emmerson, Hancock, Liu, Price, Simitian NO VOTE RECORDED: Wyland SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : Senate Rule 28.8 ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 75-0, 6/2/10 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Education: finance SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill defines school districts to include county offices of education and other agencies so that the county offices and other agencies will be eligible for federal funding distributed by the State Board of Education. ANALYSIS : Current law provides that whenever federal aid to education is provided to the state, and the disposition of the funds is not otherwise specified by federal or state law, then the distribution of those funds to local educational agencies shall be determined by the State Board of Education, consistent with the requirements of federal CONTINUED AB 1683 Page 2 law. Current law provides for county boards of education and county superintendents of schools to direct county offices of education. County offices of education operate a variety of alternative schools such as county community schools, juvenile court schools, as well as Regional Occupational Programs and Centers (ROP/C) and Special Education Local Plan Areas (SELPA). County offices also assist school districts in a variety of ways, providing instructional and financial support services and exercising oversight over the fiscal condition of districts, among other functions County offices have historically received federal funds provided for services related to their areas of responsibility, such as special education and neglected and delinquent youth. On the other hand, counties have often not been eligible for federal funds under programs such as the Title I basic grants because those programs are distributed to schools on the basis of the characteristics of pupils in an attendance area, and county schools serve pupils that are referred to them, but do not serve pupils on the basis of their residence in an attendance area. This bill defines school districts to include county offices of education and "other agencies" so that the county offices and other agencies will be eligible for federal funding distributed by the State Board of Education. Prior/Related Legislation AB 339 (Torres), Session of 2009-10, passed the Senate with a vote of 34-0, on September 9, 2007, which is nearly identical to this bill, was vetoed with the following message: "This bill would redefine "school districts" to include school districts, county offices of education, and other agencies deemed eligible pursuant to state and federal law, for the purpose of allocating federal education funds. However, in its current form, I am concerned that the bill may have AB 1683 Page 3 unintended consequences for charter schools and/or other educational agencies currently eligible for these federal funds." FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: No SUPPORT : (Verified 8/3/10) Advancement Project American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees California State PTA California Teachers Association Fight Crime Invest in Kids, California Kern County Office of Education Los Angeles County Office of Education Santa Clara County Office of Education OPPOSITION : (Verified 8/3/10) Office of the Secretary of Education ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : According to the author's office, this bill clarifies that the state allocations of federal funds to school districts also include county office of education. This legislation provides equity in funding county offices of education. County offices of education play a vital role in providing educational programs and services for students, parents, school districts and the community. This bill ensures the county offices are not inadvertently left out when federal funds are allocated. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Opponents argue this bill redefines "school districts" to include school districts, county offices of education, and other agencies deemed eligible pursuant to state and federal law, for the purpose of allocating federal education funds. They are concerned that the bill may have unintended consequences for charter schools and/or other educational agencies currently eligible for these federal funds. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Bill AB 1683 Page 4 Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, Norby, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, John A. Perez NO VOTE RECORDED: Tom Berryhill, Lieu, Miller, Audra Strickland, Vacancy PQ:do 8/4/10 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****