BILL ANALYSIS SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Senator Mark Leno, Chair A 2009-2010 Regular Session B 1 7 3 AB 1738 (Tran) 8 As Amended May 24, 2010 Hearing date: June 15, 2010 Family Code AA:mc DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: INCIDENT REPORTS HISTORY Source: Conference of California Bar Associations Prior Legislation: AB 403 (Romero) - Chap. 1022, Stats. 1999 SB 1265 (Alpert) - Chap. 377, Stats. 2002 Support: Executive Committee of the Family Law Section of the State Bar; Crime Victims Action Alliance; Peace Officers Research Association of California Opposition:None known Assembly Floor Vote: Ayes 74 - Noes 0 KEY ISSUE SHOULD THE CURRENT LAW PROVIDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIMS WITH A FREE COPY OF THEIR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INCIDENT REPORT BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE FAMILY MEMBERS AND ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATIVES, AS SPECIFIED? PURPOSE (More) AB 1738 (Tran) PageB The purpose of this bill is to expand the current law providing domestic violence victims with a free copy of the domestic violence incident report to include family members and additional representatives, as specified. Current law requires state and local law enforcement agencies to provide, without charging a fee, one copy of all domestic violence incident report face sheets, one copy of all domestic violence incident reports, or both, to a victim of domestic violence, or to his or her representative if the victim is deceased, upon request. (Family Code 6228.) Current law provides that, for purposes of this section, a representative of the victim where the victim is deceased, means any of the following: The surviving spouse. A surviving child of the decedent who has attained 18 years of age. A domestic partner. A surviving parent of the decedent. A surviving adult relative. The public administrator if one has been appointed. (Family Code 6228(g).) This bill would revise this list to include in this authority the "personal representative of the victim, as defined in (More) AB 1738 (Tran) PageC Section 58 of the Probate Code,<1> if one is appointed." This bill additionally would authorize "either of" the following persons as representatives entitled to this information where the victim is not deceased: A parent, sibling, or adult child of the victim, who shall present to law enforcement his or her identification and a signed authorization by the victim allowing that family member to act on behalf of the victim. An attorney for the victim, who shall present to law enforcement his or her identification and written proof that he or she is the attorney for the victim. A conservator or guardian of the victim. This bill would provide that domestic violence incident report face sheets may not be provided to a representative of the victim unless both of the following conditions are met: The representative presents his or her identification, -------------------------- <1> This section provides: "58 (a) 'Personal representative' means executor, administrator, administrator with the will annexed, special administrator, successor personal representative, public administrator acting pursuant to Section 7660, or a person who performs substantially the same function under the law of another jurisdiction governing the person's status. (b) 'General personal representative' excludes a special administrator unless the special administrator has the powers, duties, and obligations of a general personal representative under Section 8545." (More) AB 1738 (Tran) PageD such as a current, valid driver's license, a state-issued identification card, or a passport. The representative presents one of the following: o If the victim is deceased, a certified copy of the death certificate or other satisfactory evidence of the death of the victim at the time of the request. o If the victim is alive, a written authorization signed by the victim making him or her the victim's personal representative. RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION IMPLICATIONS The severe prison overcrowding problem California has experienced for the last several years has not been solved. In December of 2006 plaintiffs in two federal lawsuits against the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation sought a court-ordered limit on the prison population pursuant to the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act. On January 12, 2010, a federal three-judge panel issued an order requiring the state to reduce its inmate population to 137.5 percent of design capacity -- a reduction of roughly 40,000 inmates -- within two years. In a prior, related 184-page Opinion and Order dated August 4, 2009, that court stated in part: "California's correctional system is in a tailspin," the state's independent oversight agency has reported. . . . (Jan. 2007 Little Hoover Commission Report, "Solving California's Corrections Crisis: Time Is Running Out"). Tough-on-crime politics have increased the population of California's prisons dramatically while making necessary reforms impossible. . . . As a result, the state's prisons have become places "of extreme peril to the safety of persons" they house, . . . (Governor Schwarzenegger's Oct. 4, 2006 Prison Overcrowding State of Emergency Declaration), while contributing little to the safety of California's residents, . . . . California "spends more on (More) AB 1738 (Tran) PageE corrections than most countries in the world," but the state "reaps fewer public safety benefits." . . . . Although California's existing prison system serves neither the public nor the inmates well, the state has for years been unable or unwilling to implement the reforms necessary to reverse its continuing deterioration. (Some citations omitted.) . . . The massive 750% increase in the California prison population since the mid-1970s is the result of political decisions made over three decades, including the shift to inflexible determinate sentencing and the passage of harsh mandatory minimum and three-strikes laws, as well as the state's counterproductive parole system. Unfortunately, as California's prison population has grown, California's political decision-makers have failed to provide the resources and facilities required to meet the additional need for space and for other necessities of prison existence. Likewise, although state-appointed experts have repeatedly provided numerous methods by which the state could safely reduce its prison population, their recommendations have been ignored, underfunded, or postponed indefinitely. The convergence of tough-on-crime policies and an unwillingness to expend the necessary funds to support the population growth has brought California's prisons to the breaking point. The state of emergency declared by Governor Schwarzenegger almost three years ago continues to this day, California's prisons remain severely overcrowded, and inmates in the California prison system continue to languish without constitutionally (More) AB 1738 (Tran) PageF adequate medical and mental health care.<2> (More) ---------------------- <2> Three Judge Court Opinion and Order, Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, Plata v. Schwarzenegger, in the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of California and the Northern District of California United States District Court composed of three judges pursuant to Section 2284, Title 28 United States Code (August 4, 2009). The court stayed implementation of its January 12, 2010, ruling pending the state's appeal of the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. That appeal, and the final outcome of this litigation, is not anticipated until later this year or 2011. This bill does not aggravate the prison overcrowding crisis described above. COMMENTS 1. Stated Need for This Bill The author states: Current law authorizes a victim of domestic violence (or the representative of a deceased victim of domestic violence . . . .) to obtain one copy of the domestic violence incident report or domestic violence incident report face sheets, to support the evidentiary showing required to obtain a temporary restraining order or protective order, and for other purposes. However, the law does not permit the victim to authorize a representative, including the attorney hired to represent the victim in the matter, to obtain a copy of the incident report or face sheets on the victim's behalf; a representative of the victim may only obtain a copy of the incident report or face sheets if the victim is deceased. Thus, a victim who is injured, has moved to another location, or is otherwise unable to appear in person, cannot obtain a copy of the incident report or face sheet. Existing law further does not authorize the conservator of a victim to has been determined incapacitated or the guardian of a minor victim to obtain a copy of the reports or face sheets on the victim's behalf. AB 1738 . . . would permit a victim of domestic violence to authorize a member of her or his immediate family (representative to obtain a copy of the (More) AB 1738 (Tran) PageH incident report or face sheet on her or his behalf. It would also authorize the attorney of the victim hired to represent the victim in the matter related to the domestic violence and the conservator or guardian of the victim to obtain a copy of the incident report or face sheet. All authorizations would be subject to the existing prohibition against the reports or face sheets being provided to any person who has been convicted of murder in the first degree, as defined in Section 189 of the Penal Code, of the victim, or any person identified in the incident report face sheet as a suspect.2. What This Bill Would Do Current law generally requires that victims of domestic violence or, where a victim is deceased, their representative receive one free copy of all domestic violence incident report face sheets, one copy of all domestic violence incident reports, or both, as specified. This bill would make the following changes to this provision: Authorize a family member, attorney or conservator or guardian of the victim to this information where a victim is alive and has authorized that person to receive the information, as specified; Authorize a personal representative, as defined in the Probate Code, to this information where a victim is deceased;<3> and Clarify the requirements for a victim representative to obtain information under this section. 3. Background As explained in the analysis of this bill prepared by the Assembly Judiciary Committee: Law enforcement is required to complete a domestic violence incident report for each domestic ---------------------- <3> See fn. 1, supra. AB 1738 (Tran) PageI violence-related call it receives. These reports may be evidence for a court to consider when determining whether to issue a protective order for the victim. Originally, victims of domestic violence had to write and request copies of those reports, which were then provided by mail, a process that often took several weeks. That delay prejudiced victims in their ability to present a case for a protective order, so, in 1999, the Legislature required that victims be provided with an expedited and affordable method for obtaining these important reports. (AB 403 (Romero, Chap. 1022, Stats. 1999.) The Legislature expanded this provision to include representatives of deceased domestic violence victims in response to an incident where a victim had committed suicide. In that case, the victim's mother sought emergency temporary custody of the victim's children, and needed to obtain the police reports to support her case - yet she was unable to get these reports until she hired an attorney. The 2002 legislation extended to specified representatives of a deceased victim of domestic violence the right a living victim has to get face sheets and incident reports from law enforcement upon request. (SB 1265 (Alpert, Chap. 377, Stats. 2002.) ***************