BILL ANALYSIS SENATE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY Senator Mark Leno, Chair A 2009-2010 Regular Session B 1 8 4 AB 1848 (Garrick) 8 As Amended March 17, 2010 Hearing date: June 15, 2010 Penal Code JM:mc TOOLS FOR STEALING MOTORCYCLES HISTORY Source: San Diego County District Attorney Prior Legislation: SB 1554 (Dutton) - Ch. 119, Stats. 2008 AB 2015 (Corbett) - Ch. 335, Stats. 2002 Support: American Motorcyclist Association District 37; California District Attorneys Association; California Motorcycle Dealers Association; California Peace Officers' Association; California Police Chiefs Association; California State Sheriffs' Association; Los Angeles Police Protective League, Riverside Sheriffs' Association, Association of Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs; Sheriff of San Bernardino County Opposition:None known Assembly Floor Vote: Ayes 74 - Noes 0 KEY ISSUE SHOULD A NEW MISDEMEANOR BE DEFINED THAT WOULD BE COMMITTED WHERE A (More) AB 1848 (Garrick) PageB PERSON POSSESSED A TOOL OR DEVICE WITH THE INTENT TO STEAL A MOTORCYCLE? PURPOSE The purpose of this bill is to define a new misdemeanor that would be committed where a person possesses a tool or device with the specific intent of stealing a motorcycle. Existing law provides that any person who possesses specified burglary tools (picklock, vise grip, slim jim, master key, et cetera) with the intent to break into or enter any building, vehicle or vessel, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Any person who, without authority, makes or alters a key (or specified tool) so as to open the lock of a building, vehicle, et cetera, is guilty of a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code 466.)<1> Existing law provides that any person who makes, alters, or repairs any instrument or thing, knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used in committing a misdemeanor or felony, is guilty of a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code 466.) Existing law provides that any person who possesses a tool designed to break into a vending machine, and who intends to commit theft from such a machine, is guilty of a misdemeanor. (Pen. Code 466.3.) This bill provides that every person who possesses, gives, or lends any device designed to bypass the factory-installed ignition of a motorcycle in order to start the engine of a motorcycle without a manufacturer's key, or who possesses gives or lends any motorcycle ignition or part thereof, with the intent to unlawfully take or drive, or to facilitate the taking --------------------------- <1> Penal Code Section 466 effectively defines three crimes in a single paragraph-length sentence. The section would be much clearer if it were divided into subdivisions. (More) AB 1848 (Garrick) PageC or driving of a motorcycle without the consent of the owner is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in the county, by a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both. This bill provides that every person who possesses, gives, or lends items of hardware, including, but not limited to, bolt cutters, electrical tape, wire strippers, or allen wrenches, with the intent to unlawfully take or drive, or to facilitate the taking or driving of a motorcycle without the consent of the owner is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in the county, by a fine not to exceed $1,000, or both. RECEIVERSHIP/OVERCROWDING CRISIS AGGRAVATION The severe prison overcrowding problem California has experienced for the last several years has not been solved. In December of 2006 plaintiffs in two federal lawsuits against the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation sought a court-ordered limit on the prison population pursuant to the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act. On January 12, 2010, a federal three-judge panel issued an order requiring the state to reduce its inmate population to 137.5 percent of design capacity -- a reduction of roughly 40,000 inmates -- within two years. In a prior, related 184-page Opinion and Order dated August 4, 2009, that court stated in part: "California's correctional system is in a tailspin," the state's independent oversight agency has reported. . . . (Jan. 2007 Little Hoover Commission Report, "Solving California's Corrections Crisis: Time Is Running Out"). Tough-on-crime politics have increased the population of California's prisons dramatically while making necessary reforms impossible. . . . As a result, the state's prisons have become places "of extreme peril to the safety of persons" they house, (Governor Schwarzenegger's Oct. 4, 2006 Prison Overcrowding State of Emergency Declaration), while contributing little to the safety of California's residents, California "spends more on corrections (More) AB 1848 (Garrick) PageD than most countries in the world," but the state "reaps fewer public safety benefits." . . . . Although California's existing prison system serves neither the public nor the inmates well, the state has for years been unable or unwilling to implement the reforms necessary to reverse its continuing deterioration. (Some citations omitted.) . . . The massive 750% increase in the California prison population since the mid-1970s is the result of political decisions made over three decades, including the shift to inflexible determinate sentencing and the passage of harsh mandatory minimum and three-strikes laws, as well as the state's counterproductive parole system. Unfortunately, as California's prison population has grown, California's political decision-makers have failed to provide the resources and facilities required to meet the additional need for space and for other necessities of prison existence. Likewise, although state-appointed experts have repeatedly provided numerous methods by which the state could safely reduce its prison population, their recommendations have been ignored, underfunded, or postponed indefinitely. The convergence of tough-on-crime policies and an unwillingness to expend the necessary funds to support the population growth has brought California's prisons to the breaking point. The state of emergency declared by Governor Schwarzenegger almost three years ago continues to this day, California's prisons remain severely overcrowded, and inmates in the California prison system continue to languish without constitutionally (More) AB 1848 (Garrick) PageE adequate medical and mental health care.<2> The court stayed implementation of its January 12, 2010, ruling pending the state's appeal of the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. That appeal, and the final outcome of this litigation, is not anticipated until later this year or 2011. This bill does not appear to aggravate the prison overcrowding crisis described above. (More) --------------------------- <2> Three Judge Court Opinion and Order, Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, Plata v. Schwarzenegger, in the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of California and the Northern District of California United States District Court composed of three judges pursuant to Section 2284, Title 28 United States Code (August 4, 2009). COMMENTS 1. Need for This Bill According to the author: Motorcycle theft is easily committed using simple devices. Since stolen sport motorcycles are frequently sold outside of this country (especially when stolen in San Diego County), often before the owner even knows the motorcycle is gone, motorcycle thieves steal with impunity. In 2007 more than 14-hundred sport motorcycles were stolen in San Diego. In 2008, the number of stolen motorcycles decreased to 11-hundred, partly due to a regional law enforcement undercover operation. This operation identified three large, separate "cells" of thieves operating in San Diego County. Authorities were able to identify 160 individuals actively participating in one motorcycle theft ring. According to the Insurance industry, the cost of motorcycle claims run between $8,000 - 10,000.00 per claim per bike. These costs are in turned passed onto consumers in the form of higher rates. Motorcycle thieves are able to use the "pigtail" device quickly by simply cutting a few wires and inserting the device into the ignition. AB 1848 will outlaw the "pigtail," motorcycle ignition bypass devices that are currently possessed only by motorcycle thieves. There is no legitimate reason to be in possession of an ignition bypass device, and in fact, even authorized motorcycle mechanics cannot purchase this device because it is installed at the factory facility. Penal Code section 466 prohibits possession of "burglary tools," which include auto theft tools such as slim jims and shaved keys since it is a "burglary" to enter a locked motor vehicle. Also prohibited are "other instrument[s] or tool[s]" with the intent to (More) AB 1848 (Garrick) PageG commit burglary. These items are not illegal to possess if the possessor intends to steal a motorcycle since that crime does not involve burglary. When police catch a criminal in possession of a motorcycle ignition bypass device called a "pigtail," that criminal can not be arrested. Penal Code section 466 also makes it illegal to "make, alter, or repair any instrument or thing, knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used in committing a misdemeanor or felony," but this requires proving that the person made, altered or repaired a motorcycle theft tool (as opposed to merely possess the item.) Moreover, many items used to steal motorcycles have legitimate uses and are not modified in any way. Thus, when suspected motorcycle thieves are found in the middle of the night, for example, in an area known for motorcycle theft, and they possess many of the tools of the trade, such as motorcycle ignitions, wire cutters, wire strippers, or bolt cutters, they likewise can not be arrested. Finally, in cases which a convicted motorcycle thief is granted probation, it is possible to order the probationer not to possess the items proposed in this legislation. If the probationer returns to stealing motorcycles, he will likely get away with it, but it is easy to find the tools of his trade by simply conducting a probation search. The same deterrent effect should apply to non-probationers. 2. Related Existing Statute Concerning Possession of Burglary Tools Penal Code Section 466 makes the possession of a picklock, crow, keybit, crowbar, screwdriver, vise-grip plier, water-pump plier, sledgehammer, slim jim, tension bar, lock pick gun, tubular lock pick, floor-safe door puller, master keys, or other instrument AB 1848 (Garrick) PageH or tool with the intent to break or enter into any building, railroad car, vessel, or vehicle a misdemeanor. This section requires the specific intent to "feloniously break or enter," which are also elements of burglary. It appears that a perpetrator need not "break or enter" into anything to steal a motorcycle. Thus, it is argued that a person can possess the tools needed to steal a motorcycle with the intent to steal and not be subject to prosecution under existing law. This bill creates a parallel offense to the existing law concerning burglary tools that makes it a misdemeanor to possess specified tools with the intent to unlawfully take or drive a motorcycle. 3. Existing Misdemeanors Concerning Altering or Making Devices to be used in Crimes Penal Code Section 466 provides, in defining one of three separate crimes in that section, that any person who alters or makes any instrument or thing, knowing or having reason to believe that the device will be used to commit a misdemeanor or felony, is guilty of a misdemeanor. Arguably, any person who, with the requisite criminal knowledge or intent, makes or alters a tool or device for use in stealing a motorcycle key has violated Penal Code Section 466 under current law. However, the provision concerning making or altering tools that are to be used in a crime is very general. Further, it appears that this provision might not apply where a person used a tool that is specifically designed to start a motorcycle. Finally, Committee staff was not able to find a case interpreting or applying this particular provision. ***************