BILL ANALYSIS AB 1954 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 5, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON UTILITIES AND COMMERCE Steven Bradford, Chair AB 1954 (Skinner) - As Introduced: February 17, 2010 SUBJECT : Electrical transmission: renewable energy resources. SUMMARY : Requires the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to make a finding that new transmission lines from designated renewable energy zones are reasonably necessary or appropriate, and allows the CPUC to provide assurance to the utility that it can recover the costs of building transmission prior to a determination of rate recovery by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Specifically, this bill : 1)Requires the CPUC, when acting upon an application by an electrical corporation for a certificate of public convenience and necessity (CPCN), to deem new transmission facilities reasonably necessary or appropriate to provide electric service if the CPUC finds that the transmission facilities facilitate the achievement of the renewables portfolio standard (RPS). 2)Requires the CPUC to provide assurance to the transmission owner of the eligibility for recovery of costs in retail rates, prior to a determination of rate recovery by the FERC for costs that are subject to FERC jurisdiction, and conditioned upon the CPUC's subsequent determination that FERC did not approve the costs and the CPUC determines that the costs were prudently incurred and complies with public notice requirements of rate changes. 3)Requires the CPUC to approve an advice letter seeking assurance of cost recovery if either: a) The new transmission line will primarily deliver electricity generated within a designated renewable energy zone. b) The new transmission line is needed to deliver electricity where the interconnection requests include at least 50% from renewable energy generators, and all of the interconnection requests are for generation facilities that are designed to comply with the greenhouse gasses emission performance standard for baseload electric generation facilities. AB 1954 Page 2 4)Provides that the approval of an advice letter is not binding upon the CPUC in making its determination whether nor not to approve an application for a CPCN. 5)Defines renewable energy credit as a certificate of proof associated with the generation of electricity from an eligible renewable energy resource. 6)Precludes renewable energy sources from the creation of a REC if the amount of nonrenewable fuel used exceeds a de minimis quantity for each renewable energy technology , as determined by the California Energy Commission (CEC). EXISTING LAW 1)Precludes a gas corporation, an electrical corporation, and other public utilities from beginning the construction of a line, plant, or system without having first obtained from the CPUC a CPCN. 2)Allows the CPUC to recover in retail rates any increase in transmission costs resulting from the construction of the transmission facilities that are not approved for recovery in transmission rates by the FERC after the CPUC determines that the costs were prudently incurred. 3)Precludes electricity generated from a renewable energy source from the creation of a renewable energy credit (REC) if the amount of nonrenewable fuel used exceeds a de minimis quantity as determined by the CEC. 4)States legislative intent to increase the amount of electricity generated from eligible renewable energy resources per year, so that it equals at least 20 percent of total retail sales of electricity by December 31, 2010. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown. COMMENTS : According to the author, the purpose of this bill is to smooth a couple of small issues that could have big impacts on the renewable development community and on the achievement of our long-term goals. "As we move toward California's current renewable energy goals and pursue a higher standard, it has become clear that there are limitations to the statutory authority to accommodate new and improved technologies, and the current tight credit market, which, in turn, affects financing of these projects. AB 1954 Page 3 "This bill addresses a relatively technical issue that inadvertently presents impediments to financing of renewable energy - and another issue which may unintentionally serve to limit the efficient production of renewable energy." 1) Background: Current law creates a RPS that requires utilities to procure at least 20% of their electricity generation from renewable energy generators. Two bills were introduced last year (AB 64, Krekorian, and SB 14, Simitian) and one bill this year (SB 422, Simitian) to increase the RPS to 33% by 2020. Thirty-three percent of the combined utilities' portfolios equates to about 28,000 megawatts (MW). This goal can't be attained by roof-top solar alone, which requires about 13-20 homes to generate just 1 MW. (Most rooftop solar is close to 50-75 kW, where 1,000 kW equals 1 MW.) As such, the utilities are reaching to remote areas of the state that possess ample wind, solar, and geothermal potential to contribute to the majority of its portfolio of renewable generation. To determine which areas of the state would render the greatest potential to generate renewable energy, the CEC at the staff level initiated the Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI) to identify optimal renewable energy designation zones and the transmission corridors necessary to access the renewable generation facilities. The CEC contracted with an entity that represents renewable developers to conduct the stakeholder process to identify the zones and related transmission corridors. According to the CEC, RETI will assess all competitive renewable energy zones in California and possibly also in neighboring states that can provide significant electricity to California consumers by the year 2020. The California Independent System Operator (CAISO) identified 6 transmission projects that included 7 new or upgraded transmission lines, at a total cost of about $6.5 billion (preliminary estimate), for the IOUs within the CAISO balancing authority area to meet 33% RPS target in 2020. A 2008 RPS report from the CPUC concludes that the state needs 7 new major transmission lines (15,900 MW) at a cost of $6.4 billion to attain a 33% RPS by 2020. According to the CEC, in September 2009, RETI revised the renewable energy zones, including cost and environmental information. In addition, the RETI stakeholders are currently creating development scenarios to be provided to the California Transmission Planning Group (CTPG, coordinated by the California AB 1954 Page 4 Independent System Operator, or CAISO) for use as sensitivities for their proposed statewide transmission planning effort. On September 15, 2009, the CAISO launched its "Getting to 33% RPS" initiative outlining a new framework for comprehensively planning the transmission upgrades that will be needed to reach the RPS targets. Over the past year the CAISO has been collaborating with the other transmission planners and operators in California, including the municipal utilities, to assess transmission needs for the state as whole and developing a cost-effective, statewide transmission plan for 33% RPS building upon the RETI findings. After completing the public stakeholder process the CAISO expects the final statewide plan to be developed by December 2010. The plan will include a set of "no regrets" transmission upgrades that will be needed with high confidence based on committed new renewable generation, as well as "conditional" lines whose needs will be re-evaluated based on the future course of renewable generation development. The conditional category helps mitigate the risks to project developers of incurring unrecoverable costs, by allowing cost recovery for pre-construction activities undertaken for conditional projects that do not ultimately receive final approval. 2) Transmission siting : The investor-owned utilities are responsible for building and owning transmission lines. They submit their plans to the CAISO, which then develops the statewide transmission plan. Prior to building any needed transmission, the CPUC must issue a CPCN (which can take 3 to 4 years), and the transmission owner must request cost-recovery for the transmission line from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Although current law allows the CPUC to allow recovery of construction costs in retail rates, the transmission owner must first seek recovery from the FERC, and the FERC must have denied the request for cost recovery. Until either the CPUC issues the CPCN, or the FERC determines that the costs are recoverable in federal transmission rates, renewable energy developers are presumed responsible for financing the substantial cost of new or upgraded transmission. Renewable developers need to secure project financing well before the CPUC and FERC determine whether to allow transmission owners cost recovery. Without preliminary CPUC or FERC assurance, financers must assume that developers will incur all costs of the new or upgraded transmission needed to tie the generation facility to the grid, which significantly increases AB 1954 Page 5 the developer's project costs. Greater project costs (or unknown project costs) narrow the gap between costs and projected revenue, which increases risk to potential investors. As a result, either investors balk, or provide capital at higher cost in the form of up-front costs or a higher interest rate to compensate for their risk. Higher costs of capital are likely built into the generator's bid to supply electricity to the utility, which gets passed on to ratepayers. 3) Why an Advice Letter : This bill would allow the CPUC to assure cost recovery through an advice letter process prior to construction of the transmission line if the line is needed to access renewable energy generated in a RETI-designated zone. An advice letter is a filing to implement a previously decided policy question at the CPUC. Advice letters can also be used to implement a policy decision of the Legislature. Other non-advice letter applications would seek authority to do something that the CPUC has not already authorized. 4) Renewable Energy Credits : A REC represents the renewable attributes of renewable generation. A REC can remain bundled with the associated energy. If bundled, the utility buys the renewable electricity and uses the RECs to meet its RPS obligation and uses the associated electricity to meet its own load. RECs can also be traded as a separate asset from the underlying electricity (tradable RECs or tRECs). In this case, one retail seller purchases the tREC and applies it toward its RPS obligation and another retail seller purchases the associated electricity to meet its own load. The second retail seller cannot count that electricity toward its own RPS obligations. Existing law provides the CEC with authority to determine a de minimis quantity of fossil fuel that renewable energy generation can utilize and still qualify their output as renewable energy. Small quantities of fossil fuel are used by different technologies to improve reliability and operations, as well as to increase the efficiency of their conversion of renewable fuels into electrical energy. The CEC has determined the de minimis quantity needed to stabilize a biomass plant and uses that quantity as its baseline for all renewable technologies. This quantity may not be applicable to the quantity needed to stabilize other renewable technologies such as solar, wind, or geothermal. This bill would require the CEC to make its de minimis determination on a technology-specific basis, and require the CEC to make its determination at the amounts needed to enhance reliability and renewable energy output in order to have the electricity include a REC component. AB 1954 Page 6 REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support Abengoa Solar Amonix Ausra BrightSource Energy First Solar FRV Infinia Large-Scale Solar Association NextLight Solel SunPower Suntech Tessera Solar/Stirling Energy Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by : Gina Adams / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083