BILL ANALYSIS AB 1962 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 5, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT Cameron Smyth, Chair AB 1962 (Chesbro) - As Amended: March 18, 2010 SUBJECT : Real property: parks and open space: Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District: irrevocable offers of dedication. SUMMARY : Authorizes an irrevocable offer of dedication of an interest in real property to be made to the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (District), with the consent of the Board of Directors of the District (Board). Specifically, this bill : 1)Authorizes an irrevocable offer of dedication of an interest in real property for any authorized uses and purposes to be made to the District, with the consent of the Board. 2)Requires the offer of dedication to be executed, acknowledged, and recorded in the same manner as a conveyance of real property. 3)Requires that the offer of dedication, when recorded in the office of the county recorder, be irrevocable and may be accepted at any time by the Board. 4)Prescribes the process by which the offer of dedication may be terminated, and the right to accept the offer abandoned, by the Board. 5)Provides that the procedure prescribed by this measure is alternative to any other procedure authorized by law. 6)Declares that a special law is necessary due to the unique need of the District to provide a means by which potential sellers of real property interests may provide an irrevocable offer of dedication to the district for those real property interests. EXISTING LAW : 1)Authorizes an irrevocable offer of dedication of an interest in real property for any public purpose, including, but not AB 1962 Page 2 limited to, streets, highways, paths, alleys, including access rights and abutter's rights, drainage, open space, public utility or other public easements, parks, or other public places to be made to a city, county, or city and county. 2)Authorizes an open space district to take by grant, appropriation, purchase, gift, devise, condemnation, or lease, and may hold, use, enjoy, and lease or dispose of real and personal property of every kind, and rights in real and personal property, within or without the district, necessary to the full exercise of its powers. 3)States that lands subject to the grant of an open-space easement executed and accepted by an open space district in accordance with law are enforceably restricted within the meaning of Section 8 of Article XIII of the California Constitution. 4)Provides that an easement or other interest in real property may be dedicated for park or open-space purposes, or both, by the adoption of a resolution by the board of directors, and any interest so dedicated may be conveyed only as provided in law. 5)Requires that the legal title to all property acquired by an open space district under the provisions of law be immediately and by operation of law vested in the open space district, and shall be held by the open space district in trust for, and is dedicated and set apart for, the uses and purposes set forth in law. 6)Defines "vacation" as the complete or partial abandonment or termination of the public right to use a street, highway, or public service easement. 7)"Public service easement" includes all or part of, or any right in a right-of-way, easement, or use restriction acquired for public use by dedication or otherwise for sewers, pipelines, polelines, electrical transmission and communication lines, pathways, storm drains, drainage, canal, water transmission lines, light and air, and other limited use public easements other than for street or highway purposes. 8)Authorizes a legislative body to vacate a street, highway, or public service easement pursuant to the authority provided in AB 1962 Page 3 law by adopting a resolution of vacation. 9)Requires that the resolution of vacation state all of the following: a) That the vacation is made under the summary vacation procedures; b) The name or other designation of the street, highway, or public service easement and a precise description of the portion vacated. The description of the portion vacated may be by a precise map which is recorded or to which reference is made in the resolution and which is permanently maintained by the public entity; c) The facts under which the summary vacation is made. The resolution is prima facie evidence of the facts stated; and, d) That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, the street, highway, or public service easement vacated no longer constitutes a street, highway, or public service easement. FISCAL EFFECT : None COMMENTS : 1)Existing law allows a city or a county to consent to the recording of an irrevocable offer to convey any interest in real property situated within the county's or city's boundaries. This allows the city or county to defer acceptance of the offer until planning, financing and regulatory requirements have been satisfied. The offer binds the property owner, but leaves the local agency with discretion as to when, and even if, to accept the land. 2)According to the author's office, the District purchases conservation easements which sometimes include trail offers. Currently, an offer must be made first to a city or the County of Sonoma, and upon acceptance, transferred to the District. AB 1962 will allow the District to accept the offers of dedication directly. AB 1962 Page 4 3)The author believes that advancing this measure will accomplish two goals: a) streamline the process by which landowners can dedicate interests in land to the District; and, b) enhance coordination with local agencies on projects which further the goals of protecting open space and agricultural and recreational assets in the Sonoma region. 4)Support Arguments : Supporters argue that AB 1962 will give the District the ability to defer the acceptance of the offer which will allow the District to respond to changing circumstances, and to not commit funds or resources to property acquisitions that may turn out not to be in the public's interest. Opposition Arguments : Opposition may argue why this authorization is only limited to one District since there are many other open space and park districts across the state. Opposition could argue that these changes supplant the existing authority for cities and counties to accept offers of dedication in property interest. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District [SPONSOR] Cities of Cloverdale, Cotati, Santa Rosa, and Sebastopol Town of Windsor Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by : Katie Kolitsos / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958