BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 1963
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   May 12, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                    AB 1963 (Nava) - As Amended:  April 27, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                             Environmental  
          Safety and Toxic Materials                    Vote: 5-1
                       Health                                 12-5

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill requires medical professionals who conduct blood  
          testing of pesticide-handling professionals, as required by law,  
          to report test results to the Department of Pesticide Regulation  
          (DPR).  Specifically, this bill:

          1)Requires medical professionals who conduct blood testing of  
            pesticide-handling professionals, as required by law, to  
            report test results to DPR monthly and in an approved  
            electronic format, subject to a $200 fine for failure to  
            comply.

          2)Requires the report to contain certain information, including:  
             the purpose of the test, the name of the person tested,  
            contact information of the health care provider or medical  
            supervisor who ordered the analysis, contact information of  
            the analyzing laboratory, the date the sample was collected  
            and the date it was reported, and contact information for the  
            person tested and his or her employer, if known and readily  
            available.

          3)Requires the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment  
            (OEHHA) to review the test results and authorizes the office  
            to consult with local health and agriculture officials.

          4)Requires, by December 31, 2013, DPR and OEHHA, in consultation  
            with the Department of Public Health (DPH), to report to the  
            Legislature on the effectiveness of the medical supervision  
            program and the utility of laboratory-based reporting for  
            illness surveillance and prevention. 








                                                                  AB 1963
                                                                  Page  2


           FISCAL EFFECT  

          Both OEHHA and DPR report that the bill would result in  
          additional work to processes and evaluate additional data, and  
          to prepare the joint report.  Both entities indicate, however,  
          that they expect the additional work to be manageable and  
          consistent with work they already perform and, therefore, the  
          new charge can be absorbed within existing resources.

           COMMENTS  


           1)Rationale  .  Proponents contend this bill will provide public  
            health officials information with which to assess the  
            effectiveness of the state's existing program for monitoring  
            and preventing pesticide exposure.  These proponents note that  
            electronic data management should make reporting and analysis  
            of such data feasible and relatively easy.


           2)Background  .  Several state agencies, in conjunction with local  
            partners, provide public health and occupational health and  
            safety measures addressed by this bill.  DPR regulates  
            pesticide sales.  OEHHA provides risk managers in state and  
            local agencies with relevant toxicological and medical  
            information.  DPH provides leadership in the development of  
            laboratory measurements and information for assessment,  
            control, and prevention of indoor and outdoor air pollution  
            and human exposure to toxic chemicals. 


          California' cholinesterase (ChE) monitoring program was  
            established in 1974 to monitor farmworkers with the highest  
            exposure to pesticides that use organophosphates. The current  
            program requires specified workers with exposure to high  
            concentrations of organophosphate pesticides be tested  
            periodically.  Results from these tests are not collected by a  
            central agency or in a standardized format, making tracking  
            and analysis on a statewide basis difficult. 

           3)Related Legislation  .  AB 1530 (Lieber, 2007) was substantially  
            similar to this bill and passed the Assembly 47-32.  The bill  
            was held by Senate Appropriations.









                                                                  AB 1963
                                                                  Page  3


           4)Supporters  include the Health Officers Association of  
            California and  many other public health, civil rights and  
            environmental organizations, who contend the state needs the  
            data this bill provides to assess the effectiveness of  
            existing programs to monitor and prevent pesticide poisoning.


           5)Opponents  include organizations and laboratories that conduct  
            the pesticide testing described in this bill.  These opponents  
            contend it will be quite costly to complete the electronic  
            reporting required by this bill, despite a lack of evidence of  
            poisoning among professionals who handle pesticides.




           Analysis Prepared by  :    Jay Dickenson / APPR. / (916) 319-2081