BILL ANALYSIS SENATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT & RETIREMENT BILL NO: AB 1987 Lou Correa, Chair Hearing date: June 23, 2010 AB 1987 (Ma) as amended 6/01/10 FISCAL: YES PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEMS: PROHIBITS PENSION SPIKING AND REQUIRES 180 DAY BREAK IN EMPLOYMENT FOLLOWING RETIREMENT HISTORY : Sponsor: Honorable John Chiang, California State Controller Prior legislation: SB 1425 (Simitian, Correa) Assembly PER&SS Committee (contains provisions consistent with this bill) ASSEMBLY VOTES : PER & SS 6-0 4/21/10 Appropriations 15-0 5/12/10 Assembly Floor 75-0 6/03/10 SUMMARY : This bill would: 1)establishes minimum standards and requirements for all public retirement systems in California with respect to final compensation, ongoing audits with penalties for noncompliance, and prohibitions against a retiree from immediately returning to employment with the public employer on a part-time or contract basis. 2)makes requirements specific to the 1937 Act County Retirement Systems. 3)requires that both this bill and SB 1425, which contains provisions specific to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) and the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), be enacted for either bill to be effective. Pamela Schneider Date: 6/17/10 Page 1 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS : 1) Existing law : a) authorizes over 40 public retirement systems for the state's public employees, including the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS); the California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS); the 20 counties operating retirement systems under the '37 Act; and independent public retirement systems, mostly for cities and special districts. These systems provide defined benefit retirement allowances based on employees' years of service, age at retirement, and final compensation (highest paid 12 or 36 months of employment). b) allows public employers, through laws, rules, local ordinances, and collective bargaining agreements, to pay differentials, bonuses, overtime, separation pay, holiday pay, and other forms of compensation in addition to base pay and require that participating employers accurately and timely report to the retirement boards the amount of compensation paid to employees, including special forms of pay, changes in employment status, leaves, and other factors that impact compensation. c) allows a retired public employee or teacher to return to public employment with an employer covered by the retirement system he or she retired from on a part-time basis, as specified. An employee who exceeds the limited time base or earnings, as specified, may be subject to reinstatement into the retirement system and reduction or cessation of his or her retirement allowance or earnings. 2)Specifically, this bill : a) makes various findings and declarations regarding the manipulation of retirement benefits, including pension spiking, and the duties of the retirement systems to employ sound and equitable principles of oversight and the treatment of compensation. Pamela Schneider Date: 6/17/10 Page 2 b) requires each retirement system to establish accountability provisions for participating employers that include an ongoing audit process and penalty provisions for noncompliance. c) authorizes a retirement system to not include in retirement calculations any compensation they determine was paid for the principal purpose of enhancing a member's retirement benefit. d) limits cash conversions of accrued employee benefits, as specified, and prohibits final settlement or termination pay from being included in retirement calculations. e) prohibits a retiree from returning to work as a retired annuitant or as a contract employee for a period of 180 days after retirement. This requirement will apply to anyone retiring on and after January 1, 2011. f) limits the compensation used in retirement calculations for members who are not in a group or class to the average increase in compensation received during the final compensation period and the proceeding two years by employees in the same or related group as the member. g) makes the specific statutory changes needed to bring the provisions of the County Employees' Retirement Law of 1937 ('37 Act) into compliance with the new requirements imposed on all public retirement systems by the bill. h) requires the retirement boards to promulgate regulations to more specifically delineate what is excluded from "special compensation" and specifically require items of remuneration identified by the board and consistent with agreements reached in specified court cases including Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Assn. v. Board of Retirement (1997) 16 Cal. 4th 483 (Ventura) to be included as special compensation. (Note: Ventura and subsequent related judicial rulings and Pamela Schneider Date: 6/17/10 Page 3 settlement agreements, which only applied to counties governed under the 1937 Act Retirement Law, required various cash payments in addition to base salary to be counted as annual compensation.) i) specifies that nothing in the bill prohibits modification, through collective bargaining, of special compensation items agreed to in the Ventura decision. j) prohibits retirees of '37 Act retirement systems, charter city retirement systems and the police officers' and firemen's pension systems from returning to work as a retired annuitant or as a contract employee for a period of 180 days after retirement, effective for individuals who retire on and after January 1, 2011. aa) specifies that all other provisions of the bill become operative for all active and future members of the retirement systems beginning July 1, 2011. bb) specifies that this bill will not become operative unless SB 1425 (Simitian, Correa) of this year is also enacted. 3) SB 1425 (Simitian, Correa) is a companion measure to this bill and is intended to strengthen anti-spiking provisions in the Teachers' Retirement Law and the Public Employees' Retirement Law. COMMENTS : 1) Arguments in Support According to the author: Sensible reforms will prevent abuse, level the playing field and protect taxpayers Retirement systems have a duty to protect the health of their retirement system for the public employers and for the public employees who depend on a secure and adequate retirement. And the Legislature has a duty to taxpayers to guard against abuses that threaten the health of the system by making sure that resources are used fairly and equitably. Pamela Schneider Date: 6/17/10 Page 4 AB 1987 attacks abusive practices, preventing a few individuals from putting retirement at risk for the vast majority of honest, hard-working public servants, and gives retirement systems the tools to keep their assets safe and secure. Specifically, this bill would place the following restrictions and responsibilities on all public retirement systems in California: a) all retirement boards will have the same power to deny intentionally spiked or manipulated pension payments to those few who claim them. Employees and employers would have to prove that the pension increase was justified. b) employees will no longer be able to accrue years of vacation time and cash it all in at the end of their work to increase the base on which their pensions are calculated. The only thing that can be counted will be what an employee earns within a single year. c) large severance or settlement pay for an employee headed out the door to retirement will no longer be allowed to be factored in towards pensions. Additionally, pay raises for a single individual, such as a city manager, or Fire Chief, can't be counted unless others get similar raises. d) double-dipping will be addressed by prohibiting a newly retired individual from returning to work without re-instating and suspending their retirement allowance, for an employer covered by the retirement system they retired from, for at least six months, even if they attempt to come back as an independent contractor. e) state and local retirement systems will be required to establish accountability provisions that include regular audits and impose penalties for inaccurate or misleading information provided by employers or employees. f) provides retirement systems with the ability to recalculate and reduce retirement allowances if they Pamela Schneider Date: 6/17/10 Page 5 determine that someone's reported salary, and the benefit calculated based on that salary, has been intentionally spiked. 2) Arguments in Opposition Those organizations adopting an "oppose unless amended" position on the bill have raised objections to requiring a 180 day break in service between the date a person retires and the date he or she may return to work as a paid retiree. The California State Association of Counties (CSAC) states , That "a six-month wait for every retiree is overly broad and is an inappropriate interference on a local public employer's ability to choose the best candidate for a job and to efficiently and effectively manage resources." CSAC also believes that a better way to address pension spiking abuses would be to restrict final compensation earnable to base salary or wage compensation only and to statutorily reverse the impacts of the Ventura County and subsequent judicial decisions that have allowed certain collectively bargained types of pay to be included in compensation. 3) SUPPORT : Honorable Bill Lockyer, California State Treasurer California Federation of Teachers (CFT) Glendale City Employees Association (GCEA) Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association (LACERA) Organization of SMUD Employees (OSE) Retired Public Employees Association (RPEA) San Bernardino Public Employees Association (SBPEA) San Luis Obispo County Employees Association (SLOCEA) Santa Rosa City Employees Association (SRCEA) 4) OPPOSITION : California Association of School Business Officials (CASBO), (Oppose Unless Ameneded) Pamela Schneider Date: 6/17/10 Page 6 California Special Districts Association (CSDA), (Oppose Unless Amended) California State Association of Counties (CSAC), (Oppose Unless Amended) City of West Covina Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD) ##### Pamela Schneider Date: 6/17/10 Page 7