BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page  1


          ASSEMBLY THIRD READING
          AB 2035 (Coto)
          As Introduced  February 17, 2010
          Majority vote 

           HEALTH              19-0                                        
           
           -------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Monning, Adams, Ammiano,  |
          |     |Carter, Conway, De La     |
          |     |Torre, De Leon, Emmerson, |
          |     |Eng, Gaines, Hayashi,     |
          |     |Hernandez, Jones, Bonnie  |
          |     |Lowenthal, Nava, V.       |
          |     |Manuel Perez, Salas,      |
          |     |Smyth, Audra Strickland   |
          |     |                          |
           -------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Requires the third party administrator (TPA) of a  
          self-funded dental benefit plan to include a disclosure in the  
          explanation of benefits (EOB) document and benefit claim forms  
          which provides the contact information for the federal  
          Department of Labor (DOL), which regulates self-funded plans, in  
          the event the consumer has a payment dispute with the plan.    
          Specifically,  this bill  :  

          1)Clarifies that this bill only applies to a TPA for a  
            self-funded dental benefit plan.

          2)Directs the TPA of a self-funded dental benefit plan to  
            include the following disclosure in the EOB document and in  
            forms sent to claimants in response to claims for benefits:

                This dental plan is self-funded and subject to  
                compliance with the federal Employee Retirement  
                Income Security Act (ERISA).  As such, it is not  
                subject to consumer protection provisions of state  
                law governing health care coverage for dental care.   
                Any questions, appeals, or disputes arising from the  
                payment of a submitted claim should be directed to  
                the entity providing the coverage, or to the U.S.  
                DOL, Office of Participant Assistance (OPA).

          3)Requires the TPA to provide the phone number for the nearest  








                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page  2


            OPA field office in the disclosure.

          4)Makes a legislative finding that regulating TPAs pursuant to  
            this bill constitutes a regulation of insurance and is saved  
            from preemption under ERISA.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  None

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, current law requires dental  
          benefit plans regulated by CDI or DMHC to provide certain  
          disclosures to consumers, including a notice that specifies the  
          contact telephone number and address of the regulator  
          responsible for handling consumer complaints.  However, the  
          author points out that self-funded employer-sponsored benefit  
          plans are regulated by ERISA, which generally preempts state law  
          and instead provides its own requirements.  The author maintains  
          that the lack of a notification requirement as to the regulatory  
          agency that oversees self-funded dental plans makes it difficult  
          for either a patient or provider to know how to pursue a  
          possible payment dispute.  This bill is designed to regulate the  
          business of insurance by requiring insurance entities, such as  
          TPAs, to disclose to consumers in ERISA-covered plans  
          information regarding how to contact the federal DOL, the  
          regulatory agency that oversees these plans, should there be  
          payment disputes.

          ERISA is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most  
          pension and group health plans voluntarily established by  
          employers and employee organizations.  ERISA requires plans to  
          provide participants with important information about plan  
          features and funding; provides fiduciary responsibilities for  
          those who manage and control plan assets; requires plans to  
          establish a grievance and appeals process for participants to  
          get benefits from their plans; and, gives participants the right  
          to sue for benefits and breaches of fiduciary duty.  

          Generally, ERISA permits states to regulate the business of  
          insurance, including instances in which an ERISA plan contracts  
          with a state licensed insurer to provide health care to the  
          employees.  ERISA generally preempts states from regulating  
          health benefits provided by a self-insured ERISA plan.  ERISA  
          self-insured plans are subject to regulation and oversight by  
          the federal DOL.  Consequently, state insurance departments have  
          no authority to investigate consumer complaints that involve  








                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page  3


          self-funded ERISA plans.  ERISA governs approximately 2.5  
          million health benefit plans sponsored by private employers  
          nationwide.

          In self-funded plans, also known as self-insured plans, the  
          employer maintains enough money to cover employee medical  
          charges, and then hires a TPA, often an insurance company, to  
          administer the program.  Self-funded plans are not underwritten  
          by either an insurance company or a health plan.  Coverage is  
          provided for a group and is financed by the self-insured entity.  
           For example, a large employer or union may find it economically  
          advantageous to pay the cost for medical services for its  
          employees subject to the terms and conditions of the plan rather  
          than purchase either a group insurance policy or a group health  
          plan.  When an employer self-funds the plan, it is generally not  
          subject to state laws and regulations so state mandated benefits  
          or prompt payment requirements do not apply.  In circumstances  
          in which an insurance company acts as a TPA to process claims  
          for an employer self-funded plan, the insurance company is also  
          exempt from state laws and regulations.  

          The sponsor of this bill, the California Dental Association  
          (CDA) writes in support that ERISA-regulated plans are not  
          required to disclose that they are so regulated, and therefore  
          typically do not include a notification and contact number of  
          the federal agency which regulates them, thereby making it  
          difficult for either a patient or provider to know how to  
          appropriately pursue a possible payment dispute.  CDA asserts  
          that this bill is a reasonable measure to address the lack of  
          adequate information provided to patients who are in self-funded  
          plans.

          The Association of California Life and Health Insurance  
          Companies (ACLHIC) write in opposition that, while it  
          understands the need to keep the consumer informed, TPAs already  
          include information in employee booklets or other documents that  
          specifically state that the dental plan is self-funded and  
          explain a member's rights relative to disputed claim payments.   
          ACLHIC argues that EOB statements are not the appropriate venue  
          for the disclosures required by this bill because these  
          documents use a standardized format and the requirements to add  
          state-specific language to EOBs will result in expensive changes  
          to company computer systems that will raise the cost of  
          coverage. 








                                                                  AB 2035
                                                                  Page  4



           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Cassie Rafanan / HEALTH / (916)  
          319-2097                                          FN: 0003800