BILL ANALYSIS AB 2037 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 2037 (V. Manuel Perez and Salas) As Amended July 15, 2010 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |44-26|(May 10, 2010) |SENATE: |21-13|(August 18, | | | | | | |2010) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: U. & C. SUMMARY : Prohibits a load-serving entity or local publicly-owned electric utility from entering into, and the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) from approving, a long-term financial commitment for a new electrical generating facility constructed in California or in a shared pollution area if that facility does not meet Best Available Control Technology (BACT) standards and air pollution emission requirements. The Senate amendments remove the requirement that the PUC explore methods to encourage the recognition by all relevant agencies of offsets achieved anywhere in a shared pollution area, and redefine shared pollution area. EXISTING LAW : 1)Requires air districts to adopt and implement local and regional programs to reduce air pollution and to achieve state and federal ambient air standards. 2)Prohibits PUC from approving a long-term financial commitment by an electrical corporation, unless any baseload generation supplied under the long-term commitment complies with CEC's greenhouse gas emission performance standards. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill was substantially similar to the version passed by the Senate, but included the requirement that the PUC explore methods to encourage the recognition by all relevant agencies of offsets achieved anywhere in a shared pollution area. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee, minor ongoing costs to PUC, in the range tens of thousands of dollars, to review proposed long-term financial commitments between public utilities and generating facilities to ensure compliance with AB 2037 Page 2 BACT standards or possession of sufficient offsets. Actual costs will depend upon the number of proposed to be built that fall under PUC jurisdiction and that require additional review, a number likely to be very small. In any case, PUC already reviews proposed contracts between public utilities and generating facilities, so any additional workload should be minor. COMMENTS : Some power plants located in Mexico reside in the same air basin as California's border region. As a result, the adverse air emissions generated from the Mexico-based power plants affect California residents. By disallowing a California utility from engaging in a long-term contract with dirty-burning power plants, it might provide an incentive for any new powerplants on the Mexico side of the border to comply with California's BACT and air pollution control standards. Analysis Prepared by : Gina Adams / U. & C. / (916) 319-2083 FN: 0005402