BILL ANALYSIS AB 2111 Page 1 Date of Hearing: May 19, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS Felipe Fuentes, Chair AB 2111 (Smyth) - As Amended: May 6, 2010 Policy Committee: Business and Professions Vote: 11 - 0 Insurance 12 - 0 Urgency: No State Mandated Local Program: Yes Reimbursable: No SUMMARY This bill expands the number of parties who may sell service contracts. Specifically, this bill: 1)Redefines "service contract" to include an electronic appliance, as specified, and its accessories. 2)Authorizes a Service Contract Administrator (SCA) to be an obligor on a service contract, as long as the SCA has a service contract reimbursement insurance policy (SCRIP) for all service contracts under which the SCA is obligated. 3)Expands the definition of "service contract seller" or "seller" to include a third party, including an obligor who is not the seller, manufacturer, or repairer of the product, as long as the obligor obtains a SCRIP for all service contracts. 4)Deletes provisions exempting express warranties for motor vehicle lubricants, treatment fluids, or additives covering incidental or consequential damage resulting from a failure of those products from the provisions of automobile insurance. 5)Extends the sunset date from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2018. FISCAL EFFECT 1)Workload associated with this expansion would be minor and absorbable within existing resources. AB 2111 Page 2 2)It is anticipated that a small amount of revenue, approximately $50,000, will be generated by licensing additional service contract providers. COMMENTS 1)Purpose . The sponsors of the bill, the Service Contract Industry Council note that this bill will bring California's regulation of motor vehicle and consumer goods service contracts more in line with the national regulatory trend, as well as with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Model Act with respect to service contracts. "In addition, the bill will bring certain vehicle additive products that have historically been exempt from regulation into the regulatory scheme applicable to motor vehicle service contracts, ensuring that California consumers receive the protections afforded them under California's current laws governing motor vehicle service contracts." 2)Background . Under the current Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair (BEAR), Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation law, only a retailer, manufacturer, or repairer of a product may be the obligor of a service contract covering that product. The vast majority of BEAR regulated service contracts are retailer-obligor and are sold by retailers. Most of those contracts, in turn, are administered by separate firms that specialize in administering service contracts (SCAs). Historically, a third-party obligor that promises to repair a product, i.e., an obligor that does not manufacture, distribute, or sell the covered product, has been considered an insurer and has not been permitted to sell service contracts. The BEAR regulatory system for service contracts has worked reasonably well for nearly two decades. The main regulatory concern with service contracts is that the obligor be financially solvent in order to pay claims years later on service contracts with multi-year durations. Changing current law to permit third parties and SCAs to be the obligor on a service contract will codify an exception to the longstanding rule in California and most other jurisdictions that only insurers and parties in the "chain of distribution" of a product may legally promise to repair that product. The requirement in the bill that SCA-obligors and other third-party obligors be backed by a SCRIP ensures that future AB 2111 Page 3 claims will be met. If a SCA or third party does not have a SCRIP covering each contract they sell, they must be licensed as an insurer. This bill also eliminates the regulatory exemption of certain motor vehicle lubricants, treatments, fluids, and additives. Current law essentially provides that a warranty covering a motor vehicle additive is neither insurance nor a vehicle service contract (VSC). The warranty included in these products must be included in the price of the additive, but the warrantor may, and often does, charge between $1,000 - $2,000 for the bottle or tablet of additive to cover the cost of (and profit on) the warranty. However, according to the sponsor, the additive typically costs only a few dollars to manufacture. Similar additives can be purchased from auto supply stores for approximately $10. Analysis Prepared by : Julie Salley-Gray / APPR. / (916) 319-2081