BILL ANALYSIS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |Hearing Date:June 21, 2010 |Bill No:AB | | |2111 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SENATE COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS, PROFESSIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Senator Gloria Negrete McLeod, Chair Bill No: AB 2111Author:Smyth As Amended:June 14, 2010 Fiscal: Yes SUBJECT: Service contracts. SUMMARY: Revises the service contract law, and makes conforming changes to implement these changes. Existing law: 1)Regulates some 4,500 electronic service dealers, 30 service contract administrators, 5,200 service contract sellers by the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation (Bureau) in the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA). The Bureau additionally regulates appliance service dealers, combination service dealers and the home furnishings and thermal insulation industries. 2)Defines certain terms for purposes of the service contract law, including: a) "Service contract" as a contract in writing to perform, over a fixed period of time or for a specified duration, services relating to the maintenance, replacement, or repair of a set or appliance, as defined, or of furniture, jewelry, lawn and garden equipment, power tools, fitness equipment, telephone equipment, small kitchen appliances and tools, or home health care products, and may include provisions for incidental payment of indemnity under limited circumstances. Limits incidental payment of indemnity to not exceed a retail value of $250 per year. b) "Service contract administrator" or "administrator" as a person, other than a service contract seller or an insurer admitted to do business in this state, who performs or arranges, AB 2111 Page 2 or has an affiliate who performs or arranges, the collection, maintenance, or payment of money to compensate any party for claims or repairs under a service contract, and who performs other activities, as specified, on behalf of service contract sellers. c) "Service contract seller" or "seller" as a person who sells or offers to sell a service contract to a service contract holder, including a person who is the obligor under a service contract sold by the seller, manufacturer, or repairer of the product covered by the service contract. d) "Obligor" as the entity financially and legally obligated under the terms of a service contract and specifies that a service contract administrator shall not be an obligor on a service contract. 1)Makes it unlawful for any person to act as a service contract administrator or a service contract seller without first registering with the Bureau under the Electronic and Appliance Repair Dealer Registration Law. 2)Requires that a service contract fully and conspicuously disclose in simple and readily understood language the terms, conditions, and exclusions of that contract, and with equally clear and conspicuous statements, any services, parts, characteristics, components, properties, defects, malfunctions, causes, conditions, repairs, or remedies that are excluded from the scope of the service contract. 3)Requires that a service contract reimbursement insurance policy be in force for all contracts administered by a service contract administrator. A service contract reimbursement insurance policy is an insurance policy issued by an insurer licensed to transact insurance in California that guarantees to payment of service contract benefits in the event the obligor fails to provide the benefits provided by the service contract. 4)Repeals (sunsets) the service contractor provision on January 1, 2013. 5)Under the Civil Code, prohibits a service contract covering any motor vehicle, home appliance, or home electronic product purchased for use in this state from being offered for sale or sold unless several elements exist, including that the contract is cancelable by the purchaser under certain conditions. AB 2111 Page 3 6)Under the Insurance Code, defines vehicle service contract for purposes of vehicle sales, and exempts a warranty provided by a vehicle glass manufacturer from the vehicle service contract requirements. This bill: 1)Redefines "service contract" to include an electronic appliance, as specified, and its accessories and optical products, and does not include a contract to maintain structural wiring for cable, telephone, or other broadband communications services. 2)Deletes the $250 limitation on incidental payment of indemnity under a service contract. 3)Authorizes a service contract administrator to be an obligor on a service contract, as long as the administrator has a service contract reimbursement insurance policy for all service contracts under which the administrator is obligated. 4)Expands the definition of "service contract seller" or "seller" to include a third party, including an obligor who is not the seller, manufacturer, or repairer of the product, as long as the obligor obtains a service contract reimbursement insurance policy for all service contracts. 5)Provides that a "service contract seller" does not include: a) A bank or bank holding company, or subsidiary or affiliate, or a state or federally licensed financial institution that sells or offers a service contract unless it is financially and legally obligated under the terms of a service contract. b) An electrical device manufacturer or electrical contractor who constructs, installs, or services an electrical system as part of a building's electrical system, including raceways, conductors, invertors, conduit, wires, switches or similar devices. 6)Specifies that unless otherwise provided, service contractors registered under the service contractor law are exempt from all provisions of the Insurance Code. 7)Authorizes a registered service contract administrator who is an obligor on a service contract to perform all the functions of a seller and shall not be required to register separately as a seller. AB 2111 Page 4 8)Provides that unless otherwise lawfully transacting the business of insurance under an appropriate certificate of authority issued pursuant to the Insurance Code, a service contract administrator or third-party seller acting as an obligor on a service contract, without having a service contract reimbursement insurance policy covering all service contracts under which the service contract administrator or third-party seller is obligated, shall be deemed to be unlawfully transacting the business of insurance, and shall be subject to specified felony penalties, and discipline under the Insurance Code. 9)Deletes provisions exempting express warranties for motor vehicle lubricants, treatment fluids, or additives covering incidental or consequential damage resulting from a failure of those products from the provisions of automobile insurance. 10)Makes technical corrections, updating and conforming changes. 11)Extends the sunset date from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2018. 12) Changes the conditions of a motor vehicle, home appliance, or home electronic service contract cancellation so that the seller is no longer required to indicate in the contract the specific bases for a pro rata refund if the contract is cancelled. 13)Adds a warranty provided by a glass sealant manufacturer to the existing warranty exemption for a vehicle glass manufacturer from the vehicle service contract requirements. FISCAL EFFECT: The Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, dated May 19, 2010, indicates that workload associated with this expansion would be minor and absorbable within existing resources. It is anticipated that a small amount of revenue, approximately $50,000, will be generated by licensing additional service contract providers. COMMENTS: 1.Purpose. This bill is sponsored by the Service Contract Industry Council (Sponsor) in order to bring California's regulation of motor vehicle and consumer goods service contracts more in line with the national regulatory trend, as well as with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Model Act with respect to service contracts. "In addition, the bill will bring certain vehicle additive products that have historically been exempt from regulation into the regulatory scheme applicable to motor vehicle service AB 2111 Page 5 contracts, ensuring that California consumers receive the protections afforded them under California's current laws governing motor vehicle service contracts." The Sponsor further summarizes provisions in the bill as follows: a) Clarifies that product accessories and optical products may be covered under a service contract (i.e. A/C adaptors, modems, Bluetooth, eyeglasses, etc). b) Strikes an arbitrary limit of $250 on incidental indemnity that exists under current law. The Sponsor states that as these types of products have advanced, their cost has increased substantially. Therefore, removing the limit will help providers give consumers valuable benefits that they would otherwise be prohibited from offering. c) Revises the definition of "administrator" and "service contract seller" to bring California law more in line with the Model Act created by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). d) According to the Sponsor, recently, the Department of Insurance has begun rejecting service contract forms that do not select the method of calculating pro rata refunds (elapsed time or mileage) in the contract. While this is a departure from longstanding approvals by the Department, after reassessing the statutory language, the Department feels as though their hands are tied by the statute. The Sponsor contends that such an interpretation can lead to situations where the consumer is getting the short end of the stick. For example, a provider is forced to select the method of calculating a refund in the contract and selects elapsed mileage. When the refund is calculated, it turns out that the consumer drives a lot, so the pro rata calculation based on elapsed mileage is small compared to what it would have been if calculated based on elapsed time. The amendment allows the provider to determine the method of calculating the refund at the time of cancellation, rather than at the outset. This is consistent with regulation in other states, and the Department has agreed to the change, according to the Sponsor. 2.Background. Under current law, as interpreted by the Bureau, only a retailer, manufacturer, or repairer of a product may be the obligor of a service contract covering that product. This means that only a AB 2111 Page 6 company that is somewhere in the stream of commerce for the product can be an obligor for a service contract on the product. The vast majority of Bureau-regulated service contracts are retailer-obligor and sold by retailers. Most of those contracts, in turn, are administered by separate firms that specialize in administering service contracts. Historically, a third-party obligor that promises to repair a product, i.e., an obligor that doesn't manufacture, distribute, or retail the covered product, has been considered an insurer and has not been permitted to sell service contracts. The Bureau's regulatory system for service contracts has worked reasonably well for nearly two decades. The main regulatory concern with service contracts is that the obligor be financially solvent in order to pay claims years later on service contracts with multi-year durations. Changing current law to permit third parties and service contract administrators to be the obligor on a service contract will codify an exception to the longstanding rule in California that only insurers and parties in the "chain of distribution" of a product may legally promise to repair that product. The requirement in the bill that service contract administrator obligors and other third-party obligors be backed by a service contract reimbursement insurance policy ensures that future claims will be met. If a service contract administrator or third party does not have a policy covering each contract that it sells, then it must be licensed as an insurer. a) Service Contacts Explained. Service contracts (also referred to as extended warranties or maintenance agreements) cover a broad range of electronic and home appliance products as well as furniture, jewelry, lawn and garden equipment, power tools, fitness equipment, and telephone equipment and are collectively governed by the provisions of Business and Professions Code Section 9801 et seq. Those providing service contracts must register with the Bureau and comply with both the laws and regulations regarding service contracts and service contract sellers. Service contracts are also subject to regulation pursuant to the Song-Beverly Warranty Act which is intended to protect consumers who purchase goods covered by service contracts and extended warranties by requiring that certain provisions be included in the contracts and by obligating the service contract sellers to adhere to certain standards when providing such contracts or warranties. Generally, service contracts cover installation and maintenance of equipment or burglar alarm systems used in automobiles; AB 2111 Page 7 installation, maintenance and repair of telephone and/or receivers, antennas, rotors and satellite signal devices; repairing, servicing or maintaining major appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, ranges microwave ovens, washers, dryers, dishwashers, trash compactors and room air conditioners; repairing, servicing or maintaining television sets, radios, audio or video machines, recorders, video cameras, video games, video monitors, computer systems, photocopies, facsimile machines, or cell phones. b) History of the Regulation of Service Contracts in California. SB 2075 (Chapter 1075, Statutes of 1998) required DCA to conduct an in-depth study of the evolving marketplace related to home service contracts and to include recommendations regarding regulation of home service contracts. On August 31, 1999, the DCA released its report titled, The Service Contract Industry in California - Market Trends and Policy Issues (Service Contract Report). The following background information regarding the regulation of service contracts is excerpted from that report: Formerly known as the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, the Bureau was established in 1963, as a result of the enactment of the Electronic Repair Dealer Registration Law. At the time, the stated intent of the law was to provide protection to California consumers against fraud and negligence in the repair business for home electronics. Home electronics consisted mainly of radios and television sets, although the law also regulated the repair of stereo components. The most prevalent fraud and negligence was in the television repair industry. By the 1960's, it was becoming increasingly common for consumers to complain of repair businesses charging too much for repair services; or charging for services that were unnecessary, performed poorly, or not performed at all. Safety was a concern, since negligent repair could lead to fire, shock, picture tube implosion, and other safety hazards. In response, the legitimate repair industry and consumer groups sought regulatory protection from the State. Over the years, the Legislature has continued to assign responsibility to the Bureau for a number of other types of products and appliances. The Bureau was given regulatory responsibility regarding "service contracts" in 1994, with the passage of the Service Contractor Registration Act. The reason for this was that many of these service contracts provided for the maintenance, repair and/or replacement of electronics and appliances by service dealers that Bureau already regulated. The main force behind California's AB 2111 Page 8 regulation of service contracts was the occurrence of defaulting on contracts by service contract providers. In the early 1990s, consumer complaints about defaults by service contract companies increased considerably. A number of service contract companies simply went out of business or moved out of state, leaving consumers without the protection for which they paid. Consumers also complained that contracts sold to them simply duplicated repair services already covered by the manufacturer's warranty. By duplicating coverage, service contract providers were charging consumers extra money for services that were already included in their purchases, since manufacturers' warranties are included in the purchase prices of products. The basis of service contract regulations is to provide the following consumer safeguards: (1) Clear disclosure of the terms and duration of the contract. (2) Identification of responsible parties and financial obligors. (3) Protection against default of service contract sellers and administrators. (4) Confidence that the terms of the service contract will be satisfied by the obligor. (5) An avenue for mediation and remedies of consumer complaints. (6) Reasonable assurance of the financial backing of the contract. 3.Prior Legislation. AB 1553 (Wesson, Chapter 775, Statutes of 2003) expanded the definition of a "service contract" to include furniture, jewelry, lawn and garden equipment, power tools, fitness equipment, telephone equipment, small kitchen appliances and tools, home health care products, and provides that the service contract may include provisions for incidental payment of indemnity, not to exceed $250, for limited circumstances, including, but not limited to, power surges, food spoilage, or accidental damage from handling. The bill also gave service contract sellers another option to fulfill existing financial reserve requirements, through filing with the director of DCA a certified public accountant audited financial statement reflecting a net worth of not less than $100 million. AB 2111 Page 9 AB 2911 (Vargas, 2002) would have created the "Regulated Service Contract Provider Registration Law" to set up compliance standards for a "regulated provider, " if met, would have subjected the entity to regulation by the Insurance Commissioner. By setting up a different regulatory scheme certain businesses providing home warranty type protection would have been exempt from home protection laws. That bill died in the Senate Insurance Committee. AB 372 (Nation, 2001) would have removed jurisdiction over all home warranties (except those in connection with real estate sale, and those that cover heating, cooling, electric wires and plumbing) from the California Department of Insurance and placed jurisdiction instead with the Bureau. It revised the definition of "service contract" and "home protection contract" so that anyone in the business of selling such a warranty contract could be regulated by the Bureau, regardless of whether the company directly sold or serviced the particular covered home system, component or appliance. That bill died in Assembly Insurance Committee. 1.Arguments in Support. The Service Contract Industry Council states that the bill will bring California's regulation of motor vehicle and consumer goods service contracts more in line with the national regulatory trend, as well as with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Model Act with respect to service contracts. The Association of California Insurance Companies (ACIC) writes in support that the bill would make several important changes to ACIC members by clarifying the cancellation provisions in vehicle service contracts. Currently, as the law is interpreted by the Department of Insurance, service contract sellers must decide at the outset which method will be used to calculate the refund in the event a purchaser decides the cancel the contract. Essentially this would require purchasers themselves to decide at the outset which approach would be used to calculate any refund that they may be entitled to at some later date. NOTE : Double-referral to Judiciary Committee (second). SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION: Support: AB 2111 Page 10 Service Contract Industry Council (Sponsor) Association of California Insurance Companies Opposition: None received as of June 15, 2010 Consultant:G. V. Ayers