BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2178
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   April 28, 2010

                        ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
                                Felipe Fuentes, Chair

                  AB 2178 (Torlakson) - As Amended:  April 14, 2010 

          Policy Committee:                              Education  
          Vote:8-0

          Urgency:     No                   State Mandated Local Program:  
          No     Reimbursable:              No

           SUMMARY  

          This bill authorizes local education agency (LEA) grantees under  
          the After School Education and Safety (ASES) program to submit  
          specified pupil data (consistent with state and federal privacy  
          laws) to an operator of an ASES program with whom the LEA has a  
          contract.  Specifically, this bill: 

          1)Requires the State Department of Education (SDE) to develop  
            procedures and tools to collect annual data for the ASES  
            program that are consistent with the California Longitudinal  
            Pupil Achievement Data System (CALPADS) reporting procedures  
            and program development.

          2)Authorizes an LEA to submit the following pupil data to an  
            ASES program operator: (a) school day attendance, (b)  
            Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) program test scores,  
            (c) high school exit examination scores, (d) English language  
            development test scores, and (d) California Healthy Kids  
            Survey result data.      

           FISCAL EFFECT  

          GF administrative costs, likely between $125,000 and $150,000,  
          to the SDE to implement annual data collection via CALPADS.  

          The 2009 Budget Act allocated $547 million for the ASES program.  
           According to SDE, approximately 400,000 pupil slots statewide  
          are funded per day for ASES programs.    

           COMMENTS  









                                                                  AB 2178
                                                                  Page  2

           1)Purpose  .  In 2002, the voters approved Proposition 49, which  
            expanded before and after school programs and renamed them the  
            ASES program. Proposition 49 requires the state to allocate  
            $550 million annually for before and after school programs.  
            State funding for the ASES program is continuously  
            appropriated and no longer requires approval by the  
            Legislature as part of the annual budget act. The amount of  
            additional funding pursuant to Proposition 49 will be added to  
            the Proposition 98 base in future years. ASES, as modified by  
            Proposition 49, has two main goals: keeping students safe  
            after school and improving student academic outcomes. 

            Existing law requires ASES program grantees to submit annual  
            outcomes-based data to SDE, including attendance and academic  
            performance data.  Statute also authorizes SDE to consider  
            these outcomes when determining eligibility for grant renewal.  


            Current law also requires SDE, in consultation with the ASES  
            advisory committee, to develop standardized procedures and  
            tools to collect specified data, including school and program  
            attendance, homework completion rates, behavioral changes, and  
            STAR scores.  SDE reports that researchers at the University  
            of California, Davis and Irvine campuses have developed tools  
            to measure behavioral change and skills development.  The  
            researchers are currently in the process of field testing  
            these tools and they are expected to be used by grantees in  
            the 2011-12 school year.    

            According to the author, "Some after school providers have  
            difficulty obtaining student academic performance data.  Data  
            sharing allows after school providers to better serve an  
            English Learners students (ELs).  For example, if an after  
            school provider is serving an ELs and the provider had access  
            to the student California English Language Development Test  
            (CELDT) score, the provider could give the student targeted  
            academic assistance.  This bill also clarifies schools and  
            school districts sharing students' academic data with an after  
            school provider are in compliance with federal and state  
            privacy laws."

           2)ASES data collection  .  SDE's website indicates that for annual  
            2009 data collection ASES grantees are required to use  
            Statewide Student Identifiers (SSIDs) for all reported  
            students. SSIDs are how LEAs report pupil data to SDE under  








                                                                  AB 2178
                                                                  Page  3

            CALPADS.  SDE also states, "In the future the use of SSIDs may  
            eliminate the need for grantees to report assessment data  
            directly to the SDE. Instead, it will access assessment data  
            via SSIDs."  The department, however, indicates that grantees  
            are still required to report the assessment data. 


           


           Analysis Prepared by  :    Kimberly Rodriguez / APPR. / (916)  
          319-2081