BILL ANALYSIS AB 2218 Page 1 ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 2218 (Fuentes) As Introduced February 18, 2010 Majority vote PUBLIC SAFETY 7-0 APPROPRIATIONS 12-5 ----------------------------------------------------------------- |Ayes:|Ammiano, Hagman, Beall, |Ayes:|Fuentes, Ammiano, | | |Gilmore, Hill, | |Bradford, | | |Portantino, Skinner | |Charles Calderon, Coto, | | | | |Davis, | | | | |De Leon, Hall, Skinner, | | | | |Solorio, Torlakson, | | | | |Torrico | | | | | | |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------| | | |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller, | | | | |Nielsen, Norby | | | | | | ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY : Provides that inmates who commit crimes involving a direct victim shall receive priority placement in restitution centers and expands the eligibility criteria for the placement of an inmate into a restitution center. Creates credit reductions for an inmate in a county jail, city jail, industrial farm, or road camp who participates in recidivism reduction earned credit programming prior to sentencing. Specifically, this bill : 1)Declares legislative intent to fight recidivism by using a restitution center concept where inmates serving time for non-violent, non-serious offenses can fulfill obligations to pay restitution and other court related fines and fees in addition to obtaining and maintaining employment. 2)Provides that the purpose of a restitution center is to provide a means for inmates to be able to pay their victims' financial restitution, which includes direct restitution to victims as well as other restitution fines and fees, as ordered by the sentencing court; or as agreed upon by the defendant and his or her victims. 3)Stipulates that inmates who commit crimes involving a direct AB 2218 Page 2 victim shall receive priority placement in restitution centers. 4)Provides that a defendant is eligible for placement in a restitution center if the defendant does not have a criminal history of a conviction for the sale of drugs within the last five years or for an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, or a serious felony, or a violent felony, and the defendant did not receive a sentence of more than 60 months for the current offense(s). In addition, the defendant must pose no unacceptable risk to the community and must be employable. EXISTING LAW : 1)The purpose of restitution centers is to provide a means for those sentenced to prison to be able to pay their victims financial restitution as ordered by the sentencing court, or as agreed upon by the defendant and his or her victims. 2)Restitution centers shall be located in areas which will maximize the employment opportunities of persons sentenced to the centers. 3)The court may order the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to place an eligible defendant in a restitution center if the court makes a restitution order, or if a restitution agreement is entered into by the victims and the defendant. 4)A defendant is eligible for placement in a restitution center if he or she has not served a prison term within the five years prior to the present conviction, the defendant does not have a criminal history of a conviction for the sale of drugs or for a crime involving violence or sex, the defendant did not receive a sentence of more than 36 months, the defendant presents no unacceptable risk to the community, and the defendant is employable. 5)Provides that offenders shall perform all the labor necessary to maintain the restitution center and meet the offenders' needs unless the director finds that a particular task can be better performed by other persons. The Director may employ and pay compensation to offenders to perform work at a center. AB 2218 Page 3 6)Provides that: a) The offender's wages earned shall be paid directly to the CDCR, less any tax deductions. b) Wages received by the CDCR shall be used to reimburse the offender for direct employment costs, such as transportation, tools, clothing, meals, union dues, and other employee-mandated costs. Of the remaining wages: i) One-third is paid to the CDCR for the costs of the restitution center; ii) One-third first is paid to court-ordered or agreed upon restitution, and then the moneys are paid to the prosecuting jurisdiction to defray court costs and attorney fees incurred in prosecution, and then the moneys are paid to the local jurisdiction for crime prevention; and, iii) One-third is deposited into a savings account for the offender, which can be used to provide support for the offender's immediate family, purchase items necessary for employment, or given to the offender to purchase personal accessories. Upon release, the remaining money in the savings account is paid to the offender. 7)Provides that an offender shall not leave a restitution center except to go to work or when specifically authorized and shall return to the restitution center immediately after work or when required by the person in charge of the restitution center. An offender who violates this section is guilty of escape. 8)States that legislative intent that persons convicted of a crime and sentenced to state prison serve the entire sentence imposed by the court, except for a reduction in the time served pursuant to current law. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations Committee analysis, no immediate practical effect as CDCR in 2008 closed down its two restitution centers - which had a AB 2218 Page 4 combined 110 beds, but about a 30% vacancy rate - to avoid what the department claimed were unnecessary costs (about $500,000 in contract costs). This bill does not require CDCR to take any specific action, other than revising inmate eligibility. If CDCR eventually reopens a restitution center, this bill should make it somewhat easier to fill more beds, and therefore result in moderate per capita savings. Considering, however, the competition for these non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offender lower inmates between CDCR camps, community correctional facilities, work details, furlough centers, etc., CDCR will likely continue to have difficulty filling these types of beds. COMMENTS : According to the author, "AB 2218 reinforces principles of individual accountability, public safety and long-term cost savings to the taxpayers of California by: (a) re-opening Restitution Centers, where eligible and suitable non-violent state prison inmates would be required to obtain and maintain employment while also paying direct victim restitution and other restitution fines and fees owed; and (b) authorizing the creation of jail based pre-conviction programming credits for counties offering in-custody recidivism reduction programs. "AB 2218 is an example of being smart on crime because offenders who gain tangible life skills which include vocational training and actual employment are much more likely to successfully reintegrate into communities and contribute to society instead of being a drain to taxpayers. Restitution Center participants often maintain the same employment upon being released from state custody, thus providing a more seamless transition." Please see the policy committee for a full discussion of this bill. Analysis Prepared by : Meghan Masera / PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744 FN: 0004234