BILL ANALYSIS
AB 2240
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 2240 (Ma)
As Amended June 21, 2010
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |58-11|(May 6, 2010) |SENATE: |25-6 |(August 11, |
| | | | | |2010) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: AGRI.
SUMMARY : Makes permissive the re-evaluation of fees for the
Market Enforcement Branch (MEB); deletes outdated MEB fee
structures and required reporting language; increases the base
fees for licenses and complaints of purchasers of agricultural
commodities for processing and those as a dealer/broker; permits
the Secretary of the California Department of Food and
Agriculture to appoint a MEB advisory committee of producers and
licensees to provide guidance in establishing the fees; and,
makes technical and conforming changes.
The Senate amendments reduce the license fee for buyers and
processors with annual volumes of $20,000 or less, from $150 to
$136, and make technical changes.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill was substantially similar to
the version passed by the Senate.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Senate Appropriations Committee,
the new fee schedule in this bill is estimated to generate
$270,000 annually and ongoing.
COMMENTS : The statutes for MEB, many of which were established
in the 1920s, have had few significant changes until SB 1198
(Costa), Chapter 696, Statutes of 1997, that recast the
provisions for MEB operations. There are two federal programs,
the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) and the
Packers and Stockyards Act (PASA), both dealing with similar
commodities as MEB. SB 1198 conformed MEB to the federal
processes where possible, giving both PACA and PASA first
responsibility to handle claims. Those commodities not covered
by either federal program, or that the federal programs denied
action on, become the jurisdiction of MEB.
AB 2240
Page 2
The operating revenues of MEB have been reduced as expenditures
have increased over the past several years. MEB's current year
proposed budget estimates a year-end deficit, causing their
advisory board to recommend a draw from their reserves in order
to balance their budget. Without the proposed increases in
license fees in AB 2240, deficits will continue. That stated,
the Senate amendments, reducing two license fees by $14 each, may
continue to cause shortfalls and further legislation may be
necessary to address funding for MEB.
Analysis Prepared by : Jim Collin / AGRI. / (916) 319-2084
FN: 0005545