BILL ANALYSIS AB 2331 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 2331 (Skinner) As Amended June 29, 2010 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: | |(April 29, |SENATE: |34-0 |(August 9, | | | |2010) | | |2010) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- (vote not relevant) Original Committee Reference: L. GOV. SUMMARY : Provides that notwithstanding the administrative appeal provisions of the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act (FPBRA), if a current memorandum of understanding (MOU) provides for binding arbitration of appeals, the arbitrator or arbitration panel will serve as the hearing officer, rather than the administrative law judge. The Senate amendments delete the Assembly version of the bill, and instead: 1)Specify that notwithstanding the administrative appeal provisions of the FPBRA, if a current MOU provides for binding arbitration of appeals, the arbitrator or arbitration panel will serve as the hearing officer, rather than the administrative law judge. 2)Prohibits any negotiated MOU from controlling the process for administrative appeals instituted with licensing or certifying agencies and requires that those appeals be conducted in conformance with the current appeals process contained in the FPBRA. EXISTING LAW : AB 220 (Bass, Chapter 591, Statutes of 2007) established the FPBRA. In general, the FPBRA specified the procedures to be followed whenever a firefighter is subject to investigation and interrogation for alleged misconduct which may result in punitive action, such as dismissal, demotion, suspension, salary reduction, written reprimand, transfer, or even temporary reassignment. Pursuant to the FPBRA, a firefighter may bring suit in superior court for alleged violations of the act, and AB 2331 Page 2 obtain appropriate injunctive or other extraordinary relief to remedy the violation and to prevent future violations. In addition, punitive action or denial of promotion on grounds other than merit may not be undertaken by any employing department or licensing or certifying agency against any firefighter who has successfully completed the probationary period without providing the firefighter with an opportunity for administrative appeal. The FPBRA further provides that an administrative appeal instituted by a firefighter under the FPBRA will be conducted in conformance with rules and procedures adopted by the employing department or licensing or certifying agency that are in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act (APA). AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill provided that once a firefighter has notified the California Firefighter Joint Apprenticeship Program of his or her employment or reemployment, the firefighter's name will be immediately removed from the list of permanent career civilian federal, state, and local government firefighters eligible for appointment to a firefighter position by a local government. FISCAL EFFECT : None COMMENTS: According to the sponsor of the bill, the California Professional Firefighters, "Now that the FPBRA has been in effect for a few years, firefighter organizations and their employers are realizing that the current application of the law may not clearly provide for an alternative, collectively-bargained appeals procedure. With that, it's evident that the provisions of the Act governing the administrative appeals process are in need of clarification - specifically, with respect to those jurisdictions that have effectively mitigated past appeals through a locally-adopted grievance arbitration procedure. Rather than strapping these jurisdictions with the hefty cost of revamping their appeals process to conform with the Office of Administrative Law rules under the APA - costs that in many cases would be prohibitive given the current economic climate - there is a need to enable jurisdictions to utilize their existing, effective grievance arbitration appeals process as an acceptable alternative to the APA process. In enacting AB 220, the Legislature intended to establish AB 2331 Page 3 procedures that would protect the due process rights of firefighters in administrative appeals. However, as noted by the sponsor, at the time AB 220 went into effect, many firefighter organizations already had collectively bargained for alternative grievance arbitration procedures. As currently written, the FPBRA does not clearly provide for such an alternative established in a MOU. This bill would allow an arbitrator or arbitration panel to serve as the hearing officer, rather than the administrative law judge, if a current MOU provides for binding arbitration of appeals. Analysis Prepared by : Karon Green / P.E., R. & S.S. / (916) 319-3957 FN: 0005105