BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:   March 23, 2010

                   ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WATER, PARKS AND WILDLIFE
                            Jared William Huffman, Chair
                 AB 2336 (Fuller) - As Introduced:  February 19, 2010
           
          SUBJECT  :   Delta Stewardship Council: Striped Bass

           SUMMARY  :   States Legislative findings and intent regarding  
          striped bass, and requires the Delta Stewardship Council (DSC)  
          to assess the adverse impacts of invasive species predation on  
          native species, to evaluate predator suppression options, and to  
          recommend changes in laws and actions by state agencies.   
          Specifically,  this bill  :

          1)Makes Legislative findings and declarations regarding striped  
            bass, including that striped bass are harmful and highly  
            invasive species that are not native to this state, the  
            history of striped bass introduction in California, past  
            population levels of striped bass in the Delta, and the  
            predatory habits of striped bass.

          2)States Legislative intent that in order to preserve native  
            fish populations in the San Francisco Bay and the Delta the  
            DSC include in the Delta Plan programs to discourage promotion  
            of the Bay and Delta as a striped bass sport fishery, and to  
            eliminate all existing programs and legal protections for  
            striped bass.

          3)Requires the DSC in developing the Delta Plan, to assess the  
            adverse impacts of invasive species predation on native  
            species, to evaluate predator suppression options in areas of  
            the Delta that evidence the highest levels of predation, and  
            to recommend changes in law and actions by state agencies to  
            remedy the situation in as timely a manner as is practicable.   
              

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the DSC, the initial members of which are to be  
            appointed by July 1, 2010.  Requires the DSC to develop and  
            adopt a Delta Plan by January 1, 2012 that furthers the  
            coequal goals of ecosystem restoration and water supply  
            reliability.









                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  2

          2)SBX7 1, part of the water package enacted last year, requires  
            DSC in developing the Delta Plan to include, among other  
            things, sub-goals and strategies to promote self-sustaining  
            populations of native and valued species by reducing risk of  
            take and harm from invasive species, and by improving water  
            quality.  SBX7 1 also requires DSC in developing the Delta  
            Plan, to consider each of the strategies and actions in the  
            Delta Strategic Plan.  The Delta Strategic Plan, among other  
            things, recommends actions to control invasive species, to  
            re-evaluate wastewater treatment plant discharges, to regulate  
            discharges from irrigated lands, and to reduce impacts from  
            urban runoff.   

          3)Establishes the Delta Independent Science Board which shall  
            provide oversight of the scientific research, monitoring, and  
            assessment programs that support adaptive management of the  
            Delta.

          4)Allows monies in the Bay-Delta Sportfishing Enhancement Stamp  
            fund to be used for the benefit of Bay-Delta sport fisheries,  
            including but not limited to striped bass, sturgeon, black  
            bass, halibut, salmon, surf perch, steelhead trout, and  
            American shad.  Requires that the funds be expended consistent  
            with requirements of state and federal endangered species acts  
            and the ecosystem restoration component of CALFED.

          5)Prohibits striped bass from being transported or carried out  
            of or into California except striped bass taken from the  
            Colorado River by sportfishing licensees.  Allows striped bass  
            legally taken in another state that permits the sale of  
            striped bass to be imported into the state subject to Fish and  
            Game Commission (FGC) regulations. 

          6)Prohibits striped bass from being possessed aboard a  
            commercial fishing vessel, or by a commercial fisherman, and  
            prohibits striped bass from being taken by any kind of net.   
            Allows striped bass to be sold or offered for sale only by an  
            aquaculturalist, or if it was taken legally in another state.

          7)The FGC by regulation sets seasons, bag limits and size limits  
            for take of striped bass.  Current regulations establish a  
            statewide limit of 2 fish, 18 inches minimum in length, except  
            in the Colorado River District, the Southern District and  
            certain lakes, where the limit is 10 fish with no minimum size  
            restriction.








                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  3


           FISCAL EFFECT  :   Unknown

           COMMENTS  :   This bill makes Legislative findings that striped  
          bass are a harmful and highly invasive species, states  
          Legislative intent that promotion of the San Francisco Bay and  
          Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta as a striped bass sport fishery be  
          discouraged and all legal restrictions on take of striped bass  
          be removed, and directs the DSC, in developing the Delta Plan,  
          to assess the adverse impacts of invasive species predation on  
          native species and make recommendations to address those  
          impacts.  The sponsors of this bill assert that striped bass  
          have become a harmful and invasive species, and are a major  
          cause of the decline of native species, including endangered or  
          threatened salmon, steelhead and Delta smelt.  They believe that  
          having the DSC evaluate predator suppression options and  
          recommend actions to reduce predation will help to address water  
          supply management and ecosystem restoration in the Delta.  While  
          they acknowledge that striped bass predation is not the only  
          cause of native fish declines, they assert that too much  
          emphasis is being placed on water exports as the source of the  
          problems, and not enough on predation by these introduced  
          species. 

          Striped bass, which are native to the east coast, were  
          introduced into the Delta in 1879, and have been managed as a  
          game fish in California for the past 100 years.  Striped bass  
          are a prized sport fish, supporting a valued and economically  
          important sport fishery in California, and have made the Delta a  
          world class destination for striped bass fishing.  According to  
          the Department of Fish and Game's (DFG's) website, over 300,000  
          anglers fish for striped bass each year in the Delta, annually  
          catching over 200,000 fish, and spending $24 million for goods  
          and services directly connected with striped bass.  In the1990s  
          DFG stocked large numbers of striped bass, which reached a  
          record low adult population in 1994.  The federal Central Valley  
          Project Improvement Act (CVPIA) calls for a doubling of both  
          salmon and striped bass populations.  DFG received a permit from  
          the federal government to stock striped bass in the 1990s, but  
          stopped stocking striped bass around 2000, when the population  
          reached an abundance of 1.5 million adults.  At that time,  
          federal biologists estimated that about 1 percent of migrating  
          salmon and smaller numbers of Delta smelt would be impacted by  
          the stocking and required that stocking be stopped if the  
          population estimate exceeded 950,000.  








                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  4


          Since 2000 the striped bass population in the Delta has been in  
          decline. The most recent population numbers available on DFG's  
          website estimate adult striped bass abundance in the estuary at  
          approximately 800,000.  Since 2000 the number of juvenile  
          striped bass produced in the Delta have been at record lows.   
          Striped bass were included in the CALFED pelagic organism  
          decline (POD) project, along with Delta Smelt, Longfin Smelt,  
          and Threadfin Shad, as conditions in the Delta are negatively  
          impacting all four species.   According to the 2007 POD Progress  
          Report, trawl indices showed abundance of all four species began  
          to decline sharply in 2000.  Abundance indices for 2002-2006  
          show record lows for juvenile smelt and striped bass.

          Several studies on striped bass were summarized in the committee  
          analysis on AB 1253 (Fuller), a related bill heard by this  
          committee in 2009.  In general, the studies showed that while it  
          is clear striped bass are apex predators that feed on other  
          small fish, including salmon and juvenile steelhead, and have  
          been identified as one of several stressors on these  
          populations, the studies were not conclusive as to whether  
          striped bass predation is having a population level effect on  
          these species.  Given the complexity of the food web and  
          predator prey relationships, it was also unclear what the  
          effects of different predator control actions might be.  For  
          instance, several fishery scientists opined that for a predator  
          control program to have a chance of being effective it would  
          necessarily have to focus on multiple species, since striped  
          bass also feed on other fish that in turn prey on salmon or  
          compete with them for food.  In addition, several studies noted  
          that artificially created structures, like Clifton Court Forebay  
          and the Red Bluff Diversion Dam, create special problems by  
          attracting predators, and that both pumping operations and  
          current mitigation protocols contribute to conditions that make  
          fish particularly vulnerable to predation.  (See the analysis on  
          AB 1253 for a more in depth review of various prior studies.)

          The committee should be aware there are several other processes  
          currently ongoing where the impacts of invasive species, as one  
          of the other stressors on native fish in the Delta, are being  
          analyzed, including the following:

           National Academy of Sciences (NAS)  :  The NAS's recently released  
          report on alternatives for reducing water management effects on  
          threatened and endangered fishes in the Delta included a section  








                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  5

          on other stressors, including invasive species.  The report  
          notes that multiple other stressors affecting fish in the Delta  
          need to be considered, as well as their comparative importance  
          with respect to the effects of export pumping.  Given the time  
          constraints, the NAS indicated they will be conducting further  
          study on these other stressors, which will be described in  
          further detail in a second NAS report to be released next year.   


          The NAS report does point out that a holistic approach to  
          managing the ecology of imperiled fishes will be required if  
          species declines are to be reversed.  With regard to introduced  
          fishes, the NAS notes the Delta is a substantially altered  
          ecosystem, and that some of these changes likely enhance spread  
          of nonnative species.  The report notes that striped bass and  
          Sacramento pikeminnow prey on juvenile Chinook salmon,  
          especially where they congregate below Red Bluff Diversion Dam  
          and other structures, and at the Suisun Marsh salinity control  
          gates, where they are the predominant predators of juvenile  
          Chinook salmon.  The report also notes that other introduced  
          species may be even more threatening to native species, for  
          example, silverside, which likely prey on juvenile Delta smelt  
          or compete for similar copepod prey, largemouth bass, catfish,  
          and other species of introduced smelt such as the wakasagi.  The  
          report notes that Delta smelt have co-existed with these  
          non-native fish for over 100 years before the recent declines,  
          and so the decline of smelt cannot be attributed entirely to  
          their presence.  Nevertheless, some other predator species have  
          increased recently (though not striped bass), and their effects  
          on salmonids and the potential for smelt populations to recover  
          have not been well studied.  The report is consistent with other  
          studies showing there is a complex and largely unknown  
          relationship between non-native predatory fish species and their  
          population level impacts on native species, and that, more  
          scientific analysis is to be conducted.         

           Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP)  :  The BDCP steering  
          committee's list of proposed Other Stressor Conservation  
          Measures includes measures to reduce the effects of predators on  
          covered fish species by conducting localized predator control of  
          high predator density locations.  The report also calls for  
          research on increasing the harvest of non-native predatory fish  
          to decrease their abundance.

           Fish and Game Commission (FGC)  :  The FGC at their February  








                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  6

          meeting agreed to consider a regulatory action to relax the bag  
          limit and other restrictions on take of striped bass to allow  
          increased harvest.  FGC staff was directed to prepare an  
          evaluation of the proposal which was scheduled for further  
          consideration on the FGC's April and May meeting agendas.  
           
          Pending Litigation  :  The committee should be aware that the  
          issues raised by this bill are also the subject of a lawsuit  
          that is currently pending in federal court before Judge Wanger.   
          A trial date has been set in the case for June 22, 2010.   

          SBX7 1 (Simitian) (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2009)  :  The Delta  
          governance legislation enacted last year requires that the Delta  
          Plan to be developed by the DSC include measures that promote  
          characteristics of a healthy ecosystem, including, among other  
          things, viable populations of native resident and migratory fish  
          species, reduced threats and stresses on the Delta ecosystem,  
          and conditions conducive to species recovery plans and meeting  
          federal salmon doubling goals.   In addition, the plan is  
          required to include measures to promote a more reliable water  
          supply that, among other things, meet the needs for reasonable  
          and beneficial uses of water and improve water quality.  SBX7 1  
          also requires the plan to include certain sub goals and  
          strategies, including measures to promote self-sustaining  
          populations of native and valued species by reducing risk of  
          take and harm from invasive species, and by improving water  
          quality.

          SBX7 1 also requires DSC in developing the Delta Plan to  
          consider each of the strategies and actions in the  
          Administration's Delta Strategic Plan. The Delta Strategic Plan  
          contains several strategies related to other stressors.  For  
          example, the Plan recommends actions to control invasive species  
          at existing locations and in new restoration areas, to  
          re-evaluate wastewater treatment plant discharges into Delta  
          waterways, to regulate discharges from irrigated lands, and to  
          reduce impacts of urban runoff. 
           
          Arguments in Support  :  Supporters assert this bill would ensure  
          a significant Delta stressor, predation on native species, would  
          be adequately considered in the Delta Plan development and  
          adoption, as a crucial part of an overall Delta solution.   
          Supporters assert the state has focused on the export pumps for  
          restrictions, but that without acknowledging and eliminating the  
          effects of invasive and predatory species, restrictions at the  








                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  7

          pumps will not restore the populations of listed fish species.   
          The sponsors of this bill assert data on the effects of  
          predation is overwhelming, and that with water shortages, job  
          losses and billions in economic losses, it is crucial that all  
          factors affecting the Delta be addressed.  They note DFG  
          estimates striped bass consume 5.3% of the Delta smelt  
          population annually, and 6% of Sacramento winter-run Chinook  
          salmon, and that recent radio tagging surveys on the Sacramento  
          and San Joaquin Rivers show salmon smolt mortality at or above  
          50% from predator species.  They assert all stressors to native  
          Delta species should be fully and independently analyzed, and  
          problems with non-natives assessed now in light of the crisis  
          affecting the state's salmon populations and water supply  
          reductions.     

          Arguments in Opposition  :  Opponents strongly oppose this bill,  
          particularly Section One, which states Legislative intent to  
          discourage promotion of the Delta as a striped bass fishery,  
          eliminate all programs to improve striped bass, and eliminate  
          all restrictions on take of the species.  Opponents assert that  
          although there are currently no active programs to enhance  
          striped bass populations, this statement of intent represents a  
          fundamental shift in state policy away from regulation of  
          striped bass as a game fish.  Opponents assert this bill lacks  
          scientific justification, and note the SWRCB science panel, at a  
          March 23, 2010 workshop, identified control of predatory fish as  
          the lowest priority item when compared with other stressors,  
          based on importance and likelihood of having a beneficial  
          effect.  Opponents further assert this is a disguised effort to  
          obtain more water for exports by destroying a publicly owned  
          natural resource, when the facts show excessive water exports  
          from the Delta to be the main cause of the collapse of  
          California's anadromous and pelagic fisheries.  Opponents argue  
          the issue of striped bass predation should be left to state and  
          federal fishery agencies charged with managing these resources.   
          Some opponents also argue a practicable alternative to this bill  
          would be to screen Clifton Court Forebay as required in the  
          CALFED Record of Decision. 

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :   

           Support 
           
          Kern County Water District (co-sponsor)
          Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (co-sponsor)








                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  8

          Modesto Irrigation District (co-sponsor)
          San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (co-sponsor)
          American Society of Civil Engineers - Region 9
          Association of California Water Agencies
          California Cattlemen's Association
          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Citrus Mutual
          California Cotton Ginners Association
          California Cotton Growers Association
          California League of Food Processors
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association
          Desert Water Agency
          Eastern Municipal Water District
          Friant Water Authority
          Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District
          Industrial Environmental Association
          Northern California Water Association
          San Diego County Water Authority
          Turlock Irrigation District
          Valley Ag Water Coakition
          Western Agricultural Processors Association
          Western Growers Association
          Westlands Water District
          Several individuals

           Opposition  
          Allied Fishing Groups
          Bass Classics of Santa Clara
          Black Bass Action Committee
          California Fly Fishers Unlimited
          California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
          California Striped Bass Association
          Chico Flyfishers
          Coastside Fishing Club
          Delta Bass Tactics Club
          Delta Fly Fishers
          Diablo Valley Fly Fishermen
          E.C.Powell Fly Fishers Fishery Foundation of CA
          Eddo's Harbor & RV Park Inc.
          Fly Fishers for Conservation
          Fly Fishers of Davis
          Friends of Butte Creek
          Gold Country Fly Fishers
          Golden Gate Angling & Casting Club
          Golden Gate Fishermen's Association








                                                                  AB 2336
                                                                  Page  9

          Golden West Women Flyfishers
          Granite Bay Flycasters
          Grizzly Peak Flyfishers
          Mission Peak Fly Anglers
          Monterey Peninsula Flycasters
          Northern CA Council Federation of Fly Fishers
          NORCAL Kayak Anglers
          North Coast Fishermen's Association
          Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations
          Palo Alto Flyfishers
          Pasadena Casting Club
          Peninsula Fly Fishers
          Recreational Fishing Alliance
          Salmon Restoration Association
          San Jose Flycasters
          Santa Cruz Fly Fishermen
          Shasta Trinity Fly Fishers
          SWC Federation of Fly Fishers
          Tracy Fly Fishers
          Tri-Valley Fly Fishers
          United Outdoorsmen, Inc.
          United Pier & Shore Anglers of California
          USA Fishing
          Wilderness Fly Fishers
          Over 100 individuals
           
          Analysis Prepared by  :    Diane Colborn / W., P. & W. / (916)  
          319-2096