BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                  AB 2404|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  AB 2404
          Author:   Hill (D), et al
          Amended:  8/18/10 in Senate
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE BANKING, FINANCE, AND INS. COMMITTEE  :  6-3, 6/30/10
          AYES:  Calderon, Correa, Kehoe, Liu, Lowenthal, Padilla
          NOES:  Cogdill, Florez, Runner
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cox, Price
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  72-0, 5/20/10 (Consent) - See last page  
            for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Insurance

           SOURCE  :     Department of Insurance


           DIGEST  :    This bill requires insurance policies that will  
          refund premiums on other than a pro rata basis to disclose  
          that fact in writing, and authorizes the Insurance  
          Commissioner to forgo a market conduct examination of an  
          insurer up to an additional three years if certain  
          information is obtained.  

           Senate Floor Amendments  of 8/18/10 clarify that the new  
          rules proposed by the bill apply only to newly issued or  
          renewed policies, rather than to policies which may have  
          been subject to an unrelated amendment.
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                               AB 2404
                                                                Page  
          2


           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Provides that an insured person is entitled to a return  
             of his or her premium if the policy is canceled,  
             rejected, surrendered, or rescinded, unless the  
             insurance contract specifies otherwise. 

          2. Prohibits any contract for individual automobile  
             liability or homeowners' multi-peril insurance from  
             containing a provision which mandates that the premium  
             for the policy shall be fully earned upon the happening  
             of any contingency except the expiration of the policy  
             itself. 

          3. Provides that the Insurance Commissioner, whenever  
             he/she deems it necessary, shall examine the business  
             and affairs of an insurer, or when requested by petition  
             by 25 shareholders, policyholders, or creditors. 

          4. Requires the Insurance Commissioner to conduct an  
             examination of every insurer admitted in this state at  
             least once every five years.  In connection with this  
             examination, the Insurance Commissioner may examine or  
             investigate any person or the business of any person,  
             insofar as the examination or investigation is necessary  
             or material to the examination of the insurer.

          This bill:

          1. Requires any insurance policy which provides for a  
             refund of premium on other than on a pro rata basis,  
             including the assessment of cancellation fees, to  
             separately disclose that fact in writing, including the  
             actual fees or penalties to be applied, which may be  
             stated in the form of percentages of the premium.

          2. Requires this disclosure to be given prior to, or at the  
             same time as the application and prior to each renewal  
             to which the policy provision applies.  Disclosure is  
             not be required if the policy provision permits but does  
             not require the insurer to refund premium other than on  







                                                               AB 2404
                                                                Page  
          3

             a pro rata basis, and the insurer refunds premium on a  
             pro rata basis.  The disclosure requirement shall be  
             prospective and shall apply only to policies issued, or  
             renewed on or after January 1, 2012.

          3. Provides that when an application is made by telephone,  
             the disclosure must be mailed to the applicant or  
             insured person within three business days but would  
             permit the disclosure to be made electronically in lieu  
             of mailing if consented to by the recipient pursuant to  
             existing law.

          4. Specifies that the provisions of this bill do not apply  
             to cancellations of a financed insurance policy or when  
             the insured person stops payments to the lender. 

          5. Authorizes the Insurance Commissioner to forgo a market  
             conduct examination for a period of up to three years if  
             information from a market analysis indicates all of the  
             following:

             A.    Prior examination results showed no significant  
                negative findings.

             B.    Consumer complaint numbers for the insurer are in  
                the lowest quartile of complaints, for insurers in  
                that line of business. 

             C.    Market analysis identifies no other issues of  
                significant concern. 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/18/10)

          Department of Insurance (source)
          Insurance Brokers and Agents of the West 
               
           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  8/18/10)

          Association of California Insurance Companies 
          Personal Insurance Federation of California








                                                               AB 2404
                                                                Page  
          4

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the Insurance Brokers  
          and Agents of the West, which supports this "important  
          bill":  

            "AB 2404 ? permits insurers to adopt any short-rate  
            penalty provision they desire - as long as they provide  
            advance notice of that provision to the broker-agent and  
            consumer prior to policy inception.

            "Some insurers argue, in opposition to this bill, that it  
            would be impractical for them to make such disclosure in  
            advance of policy inception, given the extent to which  
            the insurance is frequently transacted over the phone or  
            in circumstances in which immediate binding is required.

            "In response, we believe the insurers' arguments actually  
            constitute a tacit admission of the need for this law.   
            It confirms the insurers do not adopt a single,  
            consistent policy; it's an implied admission that they  
            make inconsistent ad hoc decisions and do not want to  
            relinquish their ability to 'punish' consumers who want  
            to exercise the freedom of contract to find a better deal  
            in the marketplace."

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    According to the Personal  
          Insurance Federation of California (PFIC):
           
             "[PFIC] strongly believes that the proposed changes to  
            Section 481,(c),1 would lead to increased costs,  
            inhibiting to the sales process, and is unworkable.  We  
            also feel that the Department has failed to fully  
            demonstrate, specifically, the scope and breadth of the  
            problem that this bill would correct.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Bass, Beall,  
            Bill Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block,  
            Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero,  
            Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto,  
            Davis, De Leon, DeVore, Emmerson, Eng, Feuer, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber,  
            Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie  







                                                               AB 2404
                                                                Page  
          5

            Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nestande,  
            Niello, Nielsen, Norby, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino,  
            Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio,  
            Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico,  
            Tran, Yamada
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  De La Torre, Evans, Fletcher, Harkey,  
            Nava, Villines, John A. Perez, Vacancy


          JJA:mw  8/18/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****