BILL ANALYSIS SENATE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Senator Carol Liu, Chair BILL NO: AB 2418 A AUTHOR: Cook B VERSION: April 29, 2010 HEARING DATE: June 10, 2010 2 FISCAL: To the floor 4 1 CONSULTANT: 8 Hailey SUBJECT Indian children SUMMARY Revises the definition of Indian child for purposes of an Indian child custody proceeding. ABSTRACT Current law 1) Defines Indian child as any unmarried person who is under age 18 and is either a) a member of an Indian tribe, or b) is eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and is the biological child of a member of an Indian tribe. 2) Defines "Indian child custody proceeding" as an Indian child custody proceeding under the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA; 25 U.S.C. Sec. 1901 et seq.), including a proceeding for foster care, guardianship, termination of parental rights, pre-adoptive placement after termination of parental rights, or adoptive placement. Specifically excludes a voluntary foster care or guardianship placement Continued--- STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2418 (Cook) Page 2 if the parent or Indian custodian retains the rights to have the child returned upon demand, and a custody proceeding between a child's parents, unless the proceeding involves freeing a child from the custody or control of a parent. 3) Defines a "child custody proceeding" under ICWA to mean: a) foster care placement; b) termination of parental rights; c) pre-adoptive placement; or d) adoptive placement. Specifically excludes from the definition a divorce proceeding where custody is awarded to one of the parents. 4) Governs, through ICWA, the specified custody proceedings involving Indian children, including: a) Establishing jurisdictional requirements, and allowing for notice of -- and intervention in -- Indian child custody proceedings by a tribe; b) Providing that an indigent parent or Indian custodian has the right to court-appointed counsel; c) Requiring that active efforts have been made, and have failed, to prevent the breakup of the Indian family when a party seeks a foster care placement, guardianship or termination of parental rights; d) Prohibiting a court from terminating parental rights without proof beyond a reasonable doubt, or ordering foster care or guardianship without clear and convincing evidence, including the testimony of a qualified expert, that continued custody by the child's parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child; e) Establishing placement preferences for Indian children who are being placed in foster or adoptive placements; and, f) Creating protections for a parent or Indian custodian who voluntarily consents to foster care placement, guardianship or termination of parental rights. 5) Specifies the law that must be applied to an Indian child custody proceeding. 6) Specifies the notice that must be given to Indian tribes, as well as the rights of participation of those tribes, in child custody proceedings involving Indian STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2418 (Cook) Page 3 children. 7) Authorizes the dependency court to continue jurisdiction over a dependent child who has reached the age of majority if the county has not met specified requirements and termination of jurisdiction would harm the child's best interests. This bill 1) States that for purposes of an Indian child custody proceedings, an "Indian child" is either: a) An Indian child, as defined by ICWA -- any unmarried person who is under age 18 and is either a member of an Indian tribe or is eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and is the biological child of a member of an Indian tribe; or b) An unmarried person age 18 or over, but under 21 years of age, who is either a member of an Indian tribe or eligible for membership in an Indian tribe and the biological child of a member of an Indian tribe, and who is under the jurisdiction of the dependency court, unless that person or his or her attorney elects not to be considered as an Indian child for purposes of the Indian child custody proceeding. 2) Requires that all Indian child custody proceedings involving persons 18 and over must be conducted in a manner that respects the child's status as a legal adult. FISCAL IMPACT None BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION While foster children generally emancipate from dependency when they turn 18, dependency courts today may, in certain limited situations, retain jurisdiction over foster youth who have attained the age of majority. AB 12 (Beall and Bass), now being considered by this committee, would expand the number of adults who are 18 to 21 and still under the jurisdiction of the dependency court, in order to STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2418 (Cook) Page 4 provide them needed support. According to the author, AB 2418, sponsored by the Soboba Band of Luise?o Indians, expands the definition of Indian child to provide protections to tribes, families and children in certain custody proceedings involving Indian children who are no longer minors, but are still under the jurisdiction of the dependency court. The Indian Child Welfare Act establishes minimum standards that state courts must follow when removing Indian children from their homes and placing them in foster care or adoptive homes. Among other things, ICWA requires that: 1) notice be provided to tribes in Indian child custody proceedings and they be permitted to intervene in these proceedings; 2) indigent parents or Indian custodians be provided with court-appointed counsel; and, 3) active efforts must have been made, and failed, to prevent the breakup of the Indian family when a party seeks a foster care placement, guardianship or termination of parental rights. ICWA does not prevent a state from establishing higher standards and expressly recognizes that where a state has done so, the higher standards will prevail. Studies over the years have shown that outcomes for youth who emancipate from California's foster care system are, by any measure, sobering. A recent study by the Casey Family Program and the Harvard Medical School involving more than 600 case records and interviews with 500 former foster youth found that a majority of these young people face daunting mental health, education, and employment challenges: one-third of the young people in the study had incomes at or below the poverty level, one third had no health insurance, and nearly a quarter had been homeless after foster care. A 2007 report from the Children's Advocacy Institute at U.C. San Diego found that less than 3 percent of former foster youth go to college and 51percent are unemployed. In any given year, the report found, adults who were foster children comprise a disproportionate share of persons in homeless shelters and in prisons. To improve these outcomes, Congress passed the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008, which allows states, among other things, to extend foster care, KinGAP, and adoption assistance to 18- to STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2418 (Cook) Page 5 21-year-old adults emancipating from the foster care system and who meet certain requirements. As noted above, AB 12, currently under consideration, would enable California to realize this federal opportunity. Under AB 12, some young adults could continue to receive support; if they choose to do so, they would remain under the jurisdiction of the dependency court. This bill, AB 2418, recognizes the adult status of young Indians emancipating from foster care, and it provides them with some choice as to who may participate in their legal proceedings. Currently, ICWA applies to specified custody proceedings involving Indian children under the age of 18, including foster care proceedings, proceedings to terminate parental rights and adoption proceedings. This bill expands that to include adult Indian children under the age of 21 who are under the jurisdiction of the dependency court. Thus, young Indian adults over whom the dependency court has retained jurisdiction, as well as children receiving services and support under AB 12, should that bill become law, would be considered Indian children for purposes of ICWA application in proceedings, including dependency, termination of parental rights and adoption proceedings. The author believes that these steps are necessary to bring California law regarding Indian dependent youth and young adults into conformity with the policy direction of the federal Fostering Connections Act - and the state's Fostering Connections Act if that becomes law. Assembly votes Human Services Committee 6-0 Appropriations Committee 10-0 Floor 74-0 POSITIONS Support: Soboba Band of Luise?o Indians, sponsor Morongo Band of Mission Indians Oppose: None received -- END -- STAFF ANALYSIS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2418 (Cook) Page 6