BILL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------ |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | AB 2499| |Office of Senate Floor Analyses | | |1020 N Street, Suite 524 | | |(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | | |327-4478 | | ------------------------------------------------------------ THIRD READING Bill No: AB 2499 Author: Portantino (D), et al Amended: 8/5/10 in Senate Vote: 21 SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE : 9-0, 6/29/10 AYES: Lowenthal, Huff, Ashburn, DeSaulnier, Harman, Kehoe, Pavley, Simitian, Wolk SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE : 10-0, 8/9/10 AYES: Kehoe, Ashburn, Alquist, Corbett, Emmerson, Leno, Price, Wolk, Wyland, Yee NO VOTE RECORDED: Walters ASSEMBLY FLOOR : 64-10, 6/1/10 - See last page for vote SUBJECT : Traffic violator schools SOURCE : Author DIGEST : This bill consolidates the licensing of all traffic violator schools (TVSs) under the authority of the Department of Motor Vehicles and treats a violation as a conviction, rather than as a dismissal, if the person attends a TVS. ANALYSIS : Existing law defines a "traffic violator school" as a "business which for compensation provides, or offers to provide, instruction in traffic safety, including, but not limited to, classroom defensive-driver CONTINUED AB 2499 Page 2 concepts, for persons referred by the courts?or to other persons who elect to attend." A court may order a person to attend a licensed traffic violator school, a licensed driving school, or other court-approved program of driving instruction, under specified circumstances, in lieu of adjudicating the traffic offense. When a person attends a TVS, he/she is entitled to have the complaint (i.e., citation) relating to the safe operation of a vehicle dismissed. The court may not, however, dismiss a violation for attendance at a TVS under the following circumstances: The person who allegedly committed the violation holds a commercial driver's license in either this state or another. The alleged violation occurred in a commercial motor vehicle. A conviction of the violation would result in a violation point count of more than one point. The court must notify the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) when it dismisses a complaint for participation in a TVS within 10 days of the complaint being dismissed. DMV must record the dismissal but hold it confidential (i.e., mask it) if it occurs in any 18-month period. DMV regulates the licensing and administration, including minimum curriculum requirements, of classroom-based traffic violator schools, but does not regulate "home study" programs, which may offer instruction through a variety of non-classroom means (e.g., internet, textbook, video, and CD ROM). Instead, each court approves those home-study programs that it orders violators to attend. For classroom-based TVSs, existing law prescribes licensing procedures that DMV must follow for owners, operators, and instructors. TVS owners must: 1. Maintain an established place of business in the state AB 2499 Page 3 that is open to the public. 2. Conform to standards established in regulation by DMV regarding school personnel, equipment, curriculum, testing and evaluation procedures, recordkeeping, and other business practices. 3. Procure and file with DMV a bond of $2,000. 4. Have a classroom approved by DMV. 5. Have a lesson plan approved by DMV that provides not less than 400 minutes of instructional time. 6. Designate the DMV director as an agent of the TVS owner for service of process. 7. Meet the requirements prescribed for a TVS operator, if the owner is also the operator. If the owner is not the operator, then the owner must designate an employee that does meet the requirements for an operator. 8. Provide DMV assurance that the TVS will comply with the American with Disabilities Act. TVS operators must: 1. Have not committed an act that would constitute grounds for suspension or revocation of his/her license. 2. Pass an exam administered by DMV regarding traffic laws, safe driving practices, the operation of motor vehicles, teaching methods and techniques, TVS laws and regulations, and office procedures and recordkeeping. 3. Be 21 years of age or older. 4. Have provided classroom instruction for a minimum of 500 hours. TVS instructors must: 1. Be 18 years of age or older. AB 2499 Page 4 2. Have a high school education. 3. Pass a DMV exam on traffic laws, safe driving practices, the operation of motor vehicles, and teaching methods and techniques. 4. Hold a valid California driver's license. In addition to licensing classroom-based schools, DMV is also authorized to audit, inspect, and monitor all licensed TVSs. Auditing includes, but is not limited to, the review and examination of business records, class records, business practices, and the content of the program of instruction set forth in the lesson plan or curriculum of a licensee. Inspecting includes, but is not limited to, the review of the business office, branch office, and applicable classroom facilities of a licensee. Finally, monitoring includes the onsite review of the actual presentation of the program of traffic safety instruction provided in a classroom. Fees Existing law prescribes specific fees for the issuance of original, renewal, and duplicate licenses for traffic school owners, operators, and instructors. DMV may also charge for each course completion certificate, up to $3. The fee shall be in an amount to defray DMV's actual costs for publication and distribution of traffic violator schools, for monitoring instruction, business practices, record keeping, and any other activity deemed necessary to assure high quality education for traffic violators. Course Completion Certificates A traffic school purchases the certificates from DMV for issuance to it students upon completion of its course and may charge its students for the certificates in an amount not to exceed the school's actual costs. Once a student completes the course and is issued a completion certificate, the student submits the certificate to the court that then dismisses the complaint against the person. Referral List AB 2499 Page 5 When a violator opts to attend traffic school, the court, or the court-assistance program under contract with the court, must provide a list of traffic violator schools that the violator may attend. Existing law requires DMV to publish a list of traffic violator schools it licenses and to transmit the list to each superior court in the state in sufficient quantity to allow the courts to provide a copy to each person referred to a TVS. The DMV list only includes the schools it licenses, but a court may add court-approved schools for the jurisdiction the court services. Existing law prescribes the type of information that must be included on the list, how the list is organized, and procedures for removing a name if a court finds that the name of a school is inappropriate. Court-Assistance Programs (CAP) A CAP is a nonprofit agency under contract with a court to monitor traffic violator schools and provide assistance in traffic violator school administration. A CAP is required to monitor all classroom locations and home-study programs within the judicial district in which the agency is under contract with a court. A court may charge a traffic violator a fee, as determined by the court, to defray the costs incurred by a CAP for the monitoring and reporting services it provides to the court. This bill makes two major changes with regard to the administration of the TVS system. First, it requires that all traffic violator schools, whether they are classroom-based schools licensed by DMV or home-study programs approved by a court, be licensed by DMV. Second, when a violator attends a TVS program, the bill requires the court and DMV to treat the violation as a conviction that is held confidential, rather than as a dismissal. In moving responsibility for the licensing of all TVSs to DMV, this bill makes numerous changes that affect different elements of the overall TVS system, as described below: AB 2499 Page 6 Licensing TVS Owners With regard to the licensing of TVS owners, this bill makes the following changes: 1. Requires DMV to establish standards for each instructional modality, not just for classroom-based courses, and permits DMV to establish standards that are specific to the instructional modality (i.e., the standards may vary for each modality). 2. Eliminates the requirement that DMV approve classrooms, even for classroom-based courses. Typical classrooms include hotel conference rooms. 3. Deletes the minimum number of minutes (400) that lesson plans must provide for and instead requires that lesson plans include a post-lesson knowledge test. 4. Establishes a bond of $15,000 for home-study courses. 5. Establishes parameters for the operators that an owner may designate. A person may be an operator for more than school if the schools have a common owner and the schools share a single established business address. A traffic school with multiple branch or classroom locations may designate a separate operator for each location, but must designate one of the operators as the primary contact for DMV. 6. Requires an owner to have an instructor licensed by DMV but clarifies that an owner may serve as an instructor provided certain requirements are met. 7. Requires court-approved programs that were in operation prior to July 1, 2011 to apply to DMV for licensure as a traffic violator school by March 1, 2012, but allows a court-approved program to continue operating until DMV makes a licensing decision. 8. Prohibits courts from approving a TVS after July 1, 2011. Licensing TVS Operators AB 2499 Page 7 With regard to the licensing of operators, the bill deletes the requirement that an operator have a minimum of 500 hours experience providing classroom instruction and instead requires that the operator has completed an educational program that is at least four hours in length and that the owner provide to DMV a certification that the operator has the knowledge necessary to perform the duties of an operator. Course Completion Certificates This bill deletes the requirements that TVSs provide to a student a completion certificate and that the student submit the certificate to the court as evidence of course completion. Instead, this bill requires DMV by April 1, 2012, to develop a Web-based database accessible by the courts and TVSs that allow oversight of student enrollment and course completions. Requires TVSs to update course information within three business days of class completion and provide to the courts class completion information on a daily basis. Referral Lists This bill deletes the requirement that DMV publish and transmit to each superior court a referral list of DMV-licensed TVSs and the provisions of law that prescribe the type of information that must be included on referral lists, how the list is organized, and the procedures for removing the name of a TVS from the list. Instead, this bill requires DMV to provide on its website a list of all licensed TVSs and to include the modality of instruction and the cities where classroom instruction is offered. The order of the TVS names shall be randomized on a daily basis so that no one TVS receives more or less attention from traffic violators seeking a school. When providing traffic violators with a referral list, a court or a CAP may only provide a date-stamped list that has been downloaded from DMV's Web site within the past 60 days. Fees This bill deletes the specific fees prescribed in current AB 2499 Page 8 law for the licensing of traffic school owners, operators, and instructions, as well as the fees DMV charges traffic violator schools for course completion certificates, which a traffic school purchases and then issues to violators who complete its course. Instead, this bill authorizes DMV to charge fees, the amounts for which would be established by DMV through regulation, for the following activities: 1. Issuance of an original, renewal, or duplicate license to a TVS owner, operator, instructor, or for a branch or classroom location. 2. Transfer of an operator or instructor license from one TVS to another. 3. Approval of a curriculum. 4. Administration of exams for operators and instructors. The fees DMV may charge a TVS shall be sufficient to cover its costs to administer the TVS program, but may not be used to cover routine monitoring of instruction. To cover DMV's monitoring costs, this bill requires the court to assess a fee against each violator that elects to attend a TVS. The fee assessed by the court shall include a $49 administrative fee to cover its actual costs for administer traffic violations and a separate fee, determined by DMV, to cover its monitoring costs. CAPs This bill re-defines a court-assistance program as a "traffic assistance program" (TAP), which is a public or private nonprofit agency that provides services under contract with a court to process traffic violators or under contract with DMV to provide oversight activities. This change reflects the shift from a court to DMV the responsibility to approve and monitor TVSs, while maintaining the authority for a court to use a TAP to assist with the administration of traffic violations when violators opt to attend a TVS. As in current law, courts may charge violators a fee to defray its costs for employing the services of a TAP. AB 2499 Page 9 Convictions instead of Dismissals This bill provides that, beginning July 1, 2011, attending a TVS will result in a conviction, rather than a dismissal, that is held confidential by DMV and specifies that DMV will not assign a violation point on the driver's license for that conviction. A conviction will not be held confidential for attending a TVS if a violation occurred within 18 months of another conviction that was held confidential for attending a TVS. This bill requires that a court notify DMV of a conviction within five days, instead of 10 for a dismissal, when a court convicts a violator and designates the conviction confidential for attendance at a TVS. Operative Dates This bill establishes different operative dates for different programmatic changes. Specifically, this bill: 1. Prohibits a court from approving a TVS after July 1, 2011. 2. Requires a court-approved program that was in operation prior to July 1, 2011 to file with DMV an application for licensure as a TVS by March 1, 2012. 3. Requires the court to begin treating violations as convictions rather than dismissals when a violator elects to attend a TVS beginning July 1, 2011. 4. Requires the court to inform DMV that such violations are convictions, rather than dismissals, to be held confidential and requires DMV to record them as convictions to be held confidential beginning July 1, 2011. Comments There are approximately 400 licensed TVSs and 200 AB 2499 Page 10 unlicensed home study schools currently operating in the state. DMV estimates that approximately 1.2 million persons, or one-fourth of all minor traffic offenders, take a TVS class annually. The TVS option assists the operation of the courts by significantly reducing the volume of potential court cases. DMV licenses all classroom TVSs, plus their owner-operators, and instructors. In addition, DMV establishes course curricula, provides completion certificates, conducts monitoring activities, and performs other related responsibilities. Home study courses are approved by individual courts on a court-by-court basis. Consequently, for these courses, there are no consistent standards for curriculum content, duration of course, or verification of the identity of the student. Under this bill, DMV would be responsible for licensing and monitoring both classroom and home-study programs, either with their own staff or through TAPs. FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: Yes Local: Yes According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) Major Provisions 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 Fund DMV: TVS regulations minor/absorbable costsSpecial* DMV: Web site database $40 Special* DMV: licensing $500 $100 Special* (all licensing costs fully offset by fees) DMV/TAP monitoring annual costs of $2,500, fully offset by fees DMV: administration annual costs of $550, fully offset by fees DOJ processing requirements minor/absorbable costsGeneral * Motor Vehicle Account AB 2499 Page 11 SUPPORT : (Verified 8/10/10) Judicial Council of California National Association of Driving Safety Educators TrafficSchool.com OPPOSITION : (Verified 8/10/10) AVSights.com (independent contractor with CTSI) California Traffic Classes, Inc. California Traffic Safety Institute (CTSI) California Traffic School Association Comedy Traffic School Coordinated Court Services, Inc. Facil Divertido y a su Alcance TVS Fun 4U Fast 2 "Home Study Traffic School" Highway Blues, Inc. Interactive Safety Education, Inc. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department National Traffic Safety Institute Quick Stop Traffic School San Diego County Traffic School Association Traffic Classes of America at Home Traffic Safety Center, Inc. Traffic Safety Consultants, Inc. ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT : Writing in support, the Judicial Council of California writes: "The bill effectively implements the goals the Judicial Council supported in 2007 of ensuring meaningful statewide regulation of the traffic violator school industry, and relieving the judicial branch of its well-intended, but misplaced, role in attempting to ensure quality TVS programs for court users in the absence of statewide regulation." The Judicial Council goes on to explain that the traffic violator school industry has expanded over the years to include various means of home study, including internet, video, and workbook programs, but absent DMV oversight, courts have been left to respond to complaints about the quality of the home study programs. As the home study option has become more popular, the Judicial Council notes that courts have struggled to fill the regulatory void by developing their own criteria for approving, monitoring, and essentially regulating home study programs offered to traffic violators, rather than AB 2499 Page 12 denying a traffic violator the convenience of the home study option. ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION : Coordinated Court Services, Inc. writes: "The existing laws concerning the traffic violator school program were instituted based upon DMV's failure to perform this service, and there is nothing to counter that underlying premise. We believe that historically DMV has shown an inability to provide monitoring as is required under existing law. CCS sees no reason to take a system that is working well within the private sector and place it in the control of a government agency with existing revenue problems. "The financial impact of this bill would cause most classroom schools to close their doors because of the absence of lists other than on the DMV website. If the Courts had to print the lists, they would incur costs for paper, ink and other supplies as well as loss of staff time. Most courts would be unable to retain their current Court Assistance Program (CAP) clerical help because revenues will decrease, thus creating additional cost to the court in staff time. The amount of loss or additional cost to the courts may be astronomical. ASSEMBLY FLOOR : AYES: Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Bass, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Block, Blumenfield, Bradford, Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Galgiani, Gilmore, Hall, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber, Huffman, Jones, Lieu, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Villines, Yamada, John A. Perez NOES: Anderson, Blakeslee, Conway, DeVore, Gaines, Hagman, Harkey, Knight, Logue, Tran NO VOTE RECORDED: Tom Berryhill, Garrick, Jeffries, Norby, Audra Strickland, Vacancy AB 2499 Page 13 JJA:mw 8/11/10 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE **** END ****