BILL ANALYSIS AB 2503 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 2503 (John A. Perez) As Amended August 20, 2010 Majority vote ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |73-0 |(June 2, 2010) |SENATE: |31-1 |(August 25, | | | | | | |2010) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: W., P. & W. SUMMARY : Enacts the California Marine Resources Legacy Act, authorizing partial removal of a decommissioned offshore oil platform as an alternative to full removal if the Ocean Protection Council (OPC) determines there would be a net benefit to the marine environment and other requirements are met, and creates the California Endowment for Marine Preservation (Endowment). The Senate amendments : 1) Reorganize various sections into a new chapter and rename the Act the California Marine Resources Legacy Act instead of the California Marine Life Legacy Act. 2) Add new legislative findings and declarations including references to a California Ocean Science Trust June 2010 study on oil rig decommissioning which found that partial removal can result in a net benefit to the marine environment and substantial cost savings as compared to full removal. 3) Add new definitions. 4) Clarify the Department of Fish and Game's (DFG) authority to take title to decommissioned offshore oil structures in federal waters. 5) Prohibit an application for partial removal from being finally approved until applicant has complied with all AB 2503 Page 2 requirements, including payment of all state costs to review and approve the proposed project and has transmitted the portion of the cost savings required. 6) Clarify that a proposed project for partial removal of an offshore oil structure is a project for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and provide that the State Natural Resources Agency shall serve as the lead agency for the environmental review. 7) Authorize an owner or operator or other party responsible for decommissioning of an offshore oil structure to apply to DFG for approval to partially remove the structure. Require DFG to design an application process to facilitate review. Require DFG upon receipt of an application to transmit a copy to the OPC, State Lands Commission (SLC), and the Endowment. 8) Specify the minimum elements that must be included in an application. Require the applicant to also demonstrate that it will provide sufficient funds to cover the costs of all required activities, including the environmental review, determination of net benefit and cost savings, preparation and implementation of a management plan and ongoing maintenance of the structure, development of an advisory spending plan, and other activities including costs of application review. 9) Require that the first person to file an application to partially remove an offshore oil structure shall pay, in addition to all other required costs, the startup costs incurred by DFG or the SLC to implement this bill, including the costs to develop and adopt regulations. Requires DFG to reimburse payment of these startup costs from the cost savings transmitted to DFG upon conditional approval. 10)Require the OPC to determine whether partial removal will provide a net benefit to the marine environment as compared AB 2503 Page 3 to full removal. Require the OPC, prior to its initial determination of net benefit, to establish criteria for evaluating the net benefit, which criteria shall include but not be limited to the depth of the structure relative to its value as habitat and its location, including proximity to other reefs. Require OPC to consult with DFG, SLC, the Coastal Commission and the California Ocean Science Trust. 11)Require the OPC, in determining whether there would be a net benefit to the marine environment to take into account, at a minimum, specified factors. Delete air quality and other offshore and onshore environmental impacts or benefits from the list of factors that must be considered, and add other marine environmental impacts and benefits, in addition to identified management requirements and restrictions, including restrictions on fishing or other activities at the site. 12)Provide that the determination on net benefit submitted by the OPC to DFG shall be a final determination and may not be revised except by the OPC. 13)Strike the requirement for DFG to develop criteria for biological evaluation. 14)Require the SLC to determine or cause to be determined the cost savings that will result from partial removal. Require the applicant to provide necessary documentation to the SLC to calculate the cost savings, and provide that failure to do so in a timely manner may result in rejection of the application. Provide that the SLC's determination of cost savings shall be a final determination and may not be revised except by the SLC. 15)Require DFG, prior to granting conditional approval, to: a) Prepare a management plan that will ensure the net AB 2503 Page 4 benefits to the marine environment are maintained or enhanced. Management measures may, consistent with state and federal law, include a buffer zone in which fishing or removal of marine life is restricted or prohibited, and, b) Hold a public hearing in the county nearest to the oil structure. 16)Require the owner or operator of an oil structure, upon receipt of conditional approval for partial removal, to transmit a portion of the total cost savings as follows: a) 55% if the transaction occurs before January 1, 2017; b) 65% if the transaction occurs between January 1, 2017 and January 1, 2023; and, c) 80% if the transaction occurs on or after January 1, 2023. 17)Require the amount of cost savings transmitted to be apportioned as follows: a) 85% to the Endowment; b) 10% to the state General Fund; c) 2% to the Fish and Game Preservation Fund (FGPF); d) 2% to the Coastal Act Service Fund; and, e) 1% to the county immediately adjacent to the facility. 18)Require DFG, upon determining that the full amount of cost savings has been transmitted as required, to grant final approval of the application for partial removal of the oil structure. 19)Require the State Coastal Conservancy (Conservancy), upon DFG's final approval of the first application for partial removal of an offshore oil structure, to create an advisory spending plan for the cost savings deposited in the Endowment in order to provide guidance to the Board of Directors of the Endowment on spending of those funds. AB 2503 Page 5 Require the Conservancy to update the plan every five years and when each additional application for partial removal is approved. Require the Conservancy to submit a copy of the spending plan and updates to the Legislature and the Endowment Board of Directors. 20)Add legislative findings regarding California's marine resources, the importance of managing these resources for environmental sustainability, funding constraints on the ability of the state to manage and conserve marine resources, and the state interests to be served by establishing an endowment. 21)Require the Board of the Directors of the Endowment to include the following members: the Secretary of Natural Resources; the Secretary of Environmental Protection; one public member appointed by the Governor; one member appointed by the Assembly Speaker who is an expert in marine fisheries from the University of California, California State University or other accredited university; and one member appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules who is from a nonprofit public interest organization with emphasis on marine conservation or sustainable consumptive recreational activities. Board member terms shall be for 6 years, except the first member appointed by the Governor shall be appointed for a 3 year term. 22)Modify the types of projects and programs that can be funded from the Endowment to include programs with an emphasis on open coastal marine resources that will improve, encourage and support sustainable marine activities. Authorize the Endowment Board to award grants to public agencies and nonprofit organizations for specified activities, including: applied research, monitoring and data collection; projects in open coastal waters to enhance habitat for marine life, including but not limited to identification, monitoring and protection of important ecological areas; and programs to aid in establishing sustainable fishing levels, including but not limited to, identification, monitoring and protection of ecological areas to reduce or prevent habitat damage in AB 2503 Page 6 open coastal waters. 23)State that Endowment funds are not intended and shall not be used to supplant funding provided through the annual budget process to support existing obligations and activities related to coastal and marine resources. 24)Strike references to the Accelerated Existing Platform Decommissioning Program. 25)Provide that 10% of Endowment funds received per year shall be allocated by the Endowment Board as grants for projects within 24 months of receipt of the funds, and require the majority of these funds to be granted to state agencies engaged in coastal and ocean protection. 26)Make various technical changes. EXISTING LAW : 1)Establishes the California Artificial Reef Program to research the construction and placement of artificial reefs in California waters to enhance marine fish species. 2)Requires, generally, pursuant to existing state and federal offshore oil leases, removal of decommissioned oil platforms after the lease ends, though federal regulations and state and federal lease provisions allow the federal government to consider and approve decommissioning methods other than complete removal. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill: 1) Enacted the California Marine Life Legacy Act authorizing conversion of decommissioned offshore oil platforms or production facilities into artificial reefs if specified conditions were met, including a finding by DFG AB 2503 Page 7 that conversion to an artificial reef would provide a net benefit to the environment as compared to removal. 2) Required DFG to determine criteria for biological evaluation of the facility for use as an artificial reef. Upon conditional approval of a conversion, the owner or operator would be required to submit 50% of the cost savings, as determined by DFG, that the owner or operator would receive from conversion, with 90% of that amount going to the Endowment and 10% to the county immediately adjacent to the facility. 3) Established an Accelerated Existing Platform Decommissioning Program under which the 50% cost savings would be apportioned as follows: 85% to the Endowment; 5% to the county immediately adjacent to the oil facility; and 10% to the General Fund. The Endowment created by the bill would have been governed by a board of directors consisting of nine members appointed by the Governor. FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: 1) Increased costs to DFG for review estimated at $750,000 in 2010-11, $1.7 million in 2011-12, and $1.7 million in 2012-13 (FGPF, ultimately offset by fees). 2) Increased costs to SLC for review estimated at $450,000 in 2010-11, $450,000 in 2011-12, and $1.9 million in 2012-13 (General Fund, ultimately offset by fees). 3) Unknown increased revenues from cost savings potentially in the tens of hundreds of millions of dollars in future years. COMMENTS : The purpose of this bill is to provide a process by AB 2503 Page 8 which an oil company may apply to the state to leave a decommissioned offshore oil structure partially in place, with the top removed, and share the cost savings the company would incur from not having to fully remove the structure with the state and a nonprofit endowment for marine preservation that would be created. According to the author and sponsors, this bill is necessary to create the legal framework for this option and to determine how the cost savings generated will be spent. Currently, there are 27 offshore oil and gas platforms located 1.2 to 10.5 miles off the southern California coast, at depths ranging from 35 to 1,198 feet. Four of the platforms are in state waters and 23 in federal waters. Several of these rigs are expected to be decommissioned in the next decade. In the Gulf of Mexico, 85% of decommissioned oil platforms have been partially removed or toppled, providing aquatic habitat. Most of these are in much shallower water than the rigs in California. In California, six platforms have been decommissioned, all by removal. Oil companies stand to gain substantial cost savings (by some estimates in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars per platform) if they are allowed to leave some of the platform in place. The most significant Senate amendments to this bill include the following: 1) make the OPC rather than DFG responsible for determining whether there would be a net benefit to the marine environment from partial removal as compared to full removal, and narrow the scope of the net benefit determination to focus on the net benefit to the marine environment rather than the net benefit to the environment as a whole; 2) make the SLC rather than DFG responsible for calculating the cost savings; 3) make the Natural Resources Agency the lead agency for purposes of CEQA; 4) eliminate the accelerated program, thereby simplifying the process and establishing one formula for allocation of the cost savings; 5) increase the amount of the cost savings that must be shared with the state and the Endowment, and provide that the amount of cost savings required to be shared increases the longer the time period that passes before the transaction occurs, thereby creating an economic incentive for the oil rig to be decommissioned sooner; and 6) change the makeup of the AB 2503 Page 9 board of directors of the Endowment. The amendments also modify the types of projects and programs that can be funded from the Endowment, require the Conservancy to develop an advisory spending plan for the Endowment funds, and update the legislative findings to reflect a California Ocean Science Trust study on oil rig decommissioning options that was completed subsequent to passage of this bill in the Assembly. Analysis Prepared by : Diane Colborn / W., P. & W. / (916) 319-2096 FN: 0006628