BILL ANALYSIS AB 2671 Page 1 CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS AB 2671 (Cook) As Amended July 15, 2010 Majority vote. Tax levy. ----------------------------------------------------------------- |ASSEMBLY: |72-0 |(May 20, 2010) |SENATE: |35-0 |(August 24, | | | | | | |2010) | ----------------------------------------------------------------- Original Committee Reference: REV. & TAX. SUMMARY : Exempts certain corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) owned solely by a deployed member of the United States (U.S.) Armed Forces from the $800 annual tax and minimum franchise tax, and applies to taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018. The Senate amendments revise the definition of the phrase "operates at a loss," to clarify that this bill is operative only for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2018, and make several technical non-substantive changes to the provisions of this bill. AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill: 1)Provided that a corporation or a limited liability company solely owned by a deployed member of the U.S. Armed Forces is not subject to the minimum franchise tax for any taxable year in which the owner was deployed, provided that the company operates at a loss or ceases operation. 2)Defined "deployed" as being called to active duty or active service during a period when a Presidential Executive order specified that the U.S. was engaged in combat or homeland defense. The definition of "deployed" did not include a temporary duty for the sole purpose of training or processing or a permanent change of station. 3)Defined the phrase "operating at a loss" as negative net income as defined in Revenue and Taxation Code Section 24341. 4)Defined "small business" as a limited liability company or a corporation with total income of $250,000 or less. AB 2671 Page 2 5)Corrected an erroneous cross-reference and deleted provisions relating to financial asset securitization investment trusts. 6)Would take effect immediately as a tax levy and would become inoperative on January 1, 2018. FISCAL EFFECT : The FTB staff estimates this bill will result in a negligible revenue loss of less than $100,000 each fiscal year (FY), beginning with FY 2010-11. COMMENTS : 1)According to the author, this bill is intended to provide tax relief to members of the U.S. Armed Forces called to service to defend the Nation. 2)The minimum franchise tax was enacted to ensure that all corporations pay at least a minimum amount of franchise tax for the privilege of doing business in this state, regardless of the corporation's income or loss. Thus, the minimum franchise tax is not technically an "income tax", but rather it is a tax on the right to exercise the powers granted to a corporation doing business in California. Even when a corporation earns no income, it still receives the benefits of its corporate status, including the limited liability protection under the laws of this state. 3)California's minimum tax was increased from $100 to $200 in 1972. It was increased to $300 in 1987, to $600 in 1989, and to $800 in 1990. It has never been shown that the minimum franchise tax discourages businesses, particularly, since small businesses can always organize as sole proprietorships to avoid paying the minimum franchise tax. Analysis Prepared by : Oksana Jaffe / REV. & TAX. / (916) 319-2098 FN: 0006059