BILL ANALYSIS AB 2795 Page 1 Date of Hearing: April 28, 2010 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT Cameron Smyth, Chair AB 2795 (Committee on Local Government) - As Introduced: March 24, 2010 SUBJECT : Local government: organization SUMMARY : Makes several minor, non-controversial changes to the laws affecting local government organization and reorganization. Specifically, this bill : 1)Defines "divestiture of power" to mean the termination of the power and authority to provide particular functions or classes of services within all or part of the jurisdictional boundaries of a special district. 2)Defines "Executive Officer" to mean the "executive officer or designee as authorized by the commission" for the purposes of clarifying the Executive Officer's role in the special district selection process. 3)Clarifies that a local agency formation commission (LAFCO) may initiate proposals through action of adopting a resolution. 4)Clarifies existing law to bring consistency to the process for conducting elections by a board of supervisors or city council. 5)Makes conforming changes to existing law to bring consistency to election terms after incorporation. 6)Provides additional time for a local agency that is negotiating a property tax exchange as part of a proposal or reorganization by allowing that local agency to notify the LAFCO, the county auditor, and the other affected local agencies of its desire to extend the negotiating period to 90 days. 7)Corrects several obsolete and incorrect references contained in the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act. EXISTING LAW establishes the procedures for the organization and AB 2795 Page 2 reorganization of cities, counties, and special districts. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : 1)As statutes go into effect, local officials and others often discover problems or inconsistencies in the language of the law and approach the Legislature to correct them. These minor problems do not warrant separate bills, particularly since, according to the Legislative Analyst, in 2001-02 the average cost to produce a single bill was $17,890. 2)The Assembly Local Government Committee has found that it is expeditious and relatively inexpensive to respond to multiple minor, non-controversial requests on related issues by combining them into an annual "omnibus bill." Since AB 720 (Local Government Committee), Chapter 388, Statutes of 2001, which was a clean-up bill for AB 2838 (Hertzberg), Chapter 761, Statutes of 2000, the major rewrite of the laws governing local agency organization and reorganization, the Committee has focused its omnibus bill efforts on LAFCO-related issues, most recently with AB 1582 (Local Government Committee), Chapter 155, Statutes of 2009. The Committee has carried on this practice this year by addressing a number of minor, but still necessary, changes in this bill. The bill reflects the concerns of LAFCOs and others who have brought proposals and issues to the Committee. All proposals have been thoroughly vetted by a large number of stakeholders. Any proposal that provokes any controversy or opposition is rejected for inclusion. 3)Support Arguments : AB 2795 provides an efficient and cost-effective way to make a number of minor technical and non-controversial changes to law, rather than introducing a bill for each change. Opposition Arguments : None at this time. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support CA Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions [SPONSOR] AB 2795 Page 3 CA Special Districts Association Opposition None on file Analysis Prepared by : Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916) 319-3958