BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                    SB 24|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 24
          Author:   Oropeza (D), et al
          Amended:  6/11/09 in Assembly
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/21/09
          AYES:  Leno, Benoit, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  
            Wright

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8

           SENATE FLOOR  :  36-0, 5/11/09 (Consent)
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill,  
            Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham, DeSaulnier, Ducheny,  
            Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman, Hollingsworth, Huff,  
            Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod,  
            Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Romero, Runner, Steinberg,  
            Strickland, Walters, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Cedillo, Simitian, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  74-0, 7/9/09 (Consent) - See last page for  
            vote


           SUBJECT  :    Reporting and monitoring cargo theft

           SOURCE  :     Los Angeles County Sheriff


           DIGEST  :    This bill eliminates the sunset on a law that  
          defines cargo theft as a separate, and separately  
          monitored, form of grand theft.
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 SB 24
                                                                Page  
          2


           Assembly Amendments  made a minor change limiting the  
          provisions to just Section 487 of the Penal Code.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law, until January 1, 2010, provides,  
          subject to exceptions, that every person who steals, takes,  
          or carries away cargo of another, as defined, when the  
          cargo taken is of a value exceeding $400, is guilty of  
          grand theft.

          This bill eliminates the sunset clause on the crime of  
          cargo theft, a separately defined form of grand theft.

          This bill clarifies that the elements of cargo theft are  
          the same as the elements of grand theft as defined in Penal  
          Code Section 487.

           Background
           
           Tracking Cargo Theft  .  As reported on June 23, 2008, in  
          Drug Topics, a periodical for pharmacists, Ryan Toole,  
          supervisory special agent in the FBI's Violent Crimes and  
          Major Offenders Section, explained that in 2006 Congress  
          mandated separate tracking of cargo theft in police  
          reports.  Cargo thefts are reported to the FBI's Uniform  
          Crime Reports system.  Previously, an officer recovering an  
          18-wheeler leaving a port with millions of dollars' worth  
          of goods would report it simply as a recovered vehicle, the  
          same as if it were a passenger car.  Toole noted that an  
          FBI effort to educate police officers in reporting on the  
          new system has resulted in sophisticated sharing of  
          information among agencies.

          The statutory citations for cargo theft under federal law,  
          and the requirements for reporting cargo theft under the  
          Uniform Crime Reports, are set out above in "Existing Law."  


           Federal Bureau of Investigation Cargo Theft Priorities  .   
          According to an article from 2006 on the FBI website:

            Cargo theft is estimated to cost the U.S. $15-30  
            billion a year, though the true measure may be even  
            higher, since some businesses are reluctant to report  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 SB 24
                                                                Page  
          3

            thefts out of concern for their reputations or their  
            insurance premiums.  Thieves' methods vary, but the  
            outcome is generally the same a load of merchandise  
            leaves Point-A and never arrives at Point-B. 

            "Cargo theft is our number-one priority in Major  
            Theft," says Unit Chief Eric B. Ives, who heads the  
            Major Theft Unit in the FBI's Criminal Investigative  
            Division.  "There's never been a time when there's not  
            enough work."

            The issue is much broader than a criminal stealing a TV  
            off a truck.  In the past few years, investigations  
            have revealed more and more sophisticated operations  
            with well-organized hierarchies.  The typical "criminal  
            enterprise," as Ives describes it, has a leader who  
            runs a regional or national operation.  Beneath him are  
            cells of thieves and brokers, or fences, who unload the  
            stolen goods on the black market.  "Lumpers" physically  
            move the goods, along with drivers.  And there's  
            usually a specialist who is expert at foiling the  
            anti-theft locks on truck trailers. 

            Cargo thieves heist whole truck loads of merchandise  
            the average freight on a trailer is valued between  
            $12,000 and $3 million.  The hotspots are where you  
            might expect truck yards, hubs for commercial freight  
            carriers, and port cities. 

            To fight the problem, seven cargo theft task forces,  
            made up of FBI agents and local law enforcement,  
            operate in six cities: Memphis, Houston, Newark, New  
            York, San Juan, and Miami, which has two.   
            Investigations are aimed at toppling whole operations. 

            "While causing a disruption to the criminal operation  
            is important, the ultimate goal of the FBI is to  
            completely dismantle the criminal enterprise," Ives  
            says. 

          Some undercover investigations may last more than a year  
          and involve setting up front warehouses to fence stolen  
          merchandise.  Private industry support is critical in long  
          term investigations.  "They know that if we can reduce  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 SB 24
                                                                Page  
          4

          cargo theft by taking out the criminal enterprise it  
          benefits them," Ives says. 

           The Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach are the  
          First and Second Busiest Container Ports in the U.S.  
          Respectively  .  According to the Port Website, the Port of  
          Los Angeles handles nearly $190 billion worth of cargo  
          annually.  The Port of Long Beach typically handles well  
          over $100 billion worth of cargo annually.  ($140 billion  
          in 2007.)  Various tracking reports list Los Angeles and  
          Long Beach (in that order) as the two busiest container  
          ports in the United States.  Essentially, a large portion  
          of the foreign goods entering commerce in the United States  
          passes through Southern California Ports.  The volume of  
          material that must be moved through the port presents  
          serious security, smuggling and theft concerns.  Arguably,  
          tracking cargo theft demonstrates success, or lack thereof,  
          in securing the ports.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/9/09)

          Los Angeles County Sheriff (source)
          Alameda County Sheriff's Department 
          Butte County Sheriff's Department 
          California District Attorneys Association 
          California Peace Officers' Association 
          California Police Chiefs Association 
          California Retailers Association
          California State Sheriffs' Association 
          El Dorado County Sheriff's Department 
          Harbor Association of Industry and Commerce 
          Inyo County Sheriff's Department 
          LAX Coastal Area Chamber of Commerce 
          League of California Cities 
          Long Beach Police Officers Association 
          Shasta County Sheriff's Department 
          South Bay Association of Chambers of Commerce 


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office  
          states, since AB 1814 (Oropeza), Chapter 515, Statutes of  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 SB 24
                                                                Page  
          5

          2004, was passed, law enforcement has been able to  
          accurately track cargo theft which has built the case to  
          receive Federal Homeland Security dollars.  With this law's  
          proven success, a sunset at the end of this year is not in  
          California's best interest.  This bill reauthorizes the law  
          and will continue to assist in providing much needed  
          resources to the protection of our ports. 

          Prior to AB 1814, there was no standard classification for  
          cargo that was stolen from a trailer, rail car, or storage  
          container at ports in the state.  The crime could be  
          classified as any number of different felony crimes  
          (burglary, robbery, larceny, grand theft, etc.) depending  
          on the circumstances.  Without a standard classification,  
          it became difficult to track the seriousness of the crime.   
          On a nation level, it is estimated $10 to $15 billion of  
          cargo is stolen annually.  Further, as 42 percent of all US  
          International container trade enters this country through  
          the Long Beach/Los Angeles ports, we must provide the best  
          security to ensure the nation's commerce can move freely in  
          and out of California's ports.


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Carter, Chesbro, Conway,  
            Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore,  
            Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong, Fuentes,  
            Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick, Gilmore,  
            Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill, Huber,  
            Huffman, Jeffries, Knight, Lieu, Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal,  
            Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen,  
            John A. Perez, V. Manuel Perez, Portantino, Ruskin,  
            Salas, Saldana, Silva, Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra  
            Strickland, Swanson, Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran,  
            Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Charles Calderon, Duvall, Jones,  
            Krekorian, Nava, Vacancy


          RJG:do  7/9/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                 SB 24
                                                                Page  
          6


                                ****  END  ****











































                                                           CONTINUED