BILL ANALYSIS
SENATE FOOD and AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE
Senator Dean Florez, Chairman
BILL NO: SB 135 HEARING: 4/21/09
AUTHOR: Florez FISCAL: Yes
VERSION: 4/13/09 CONSULTANT: John Chandler
Animal abuse: cattle: tail docking.
BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW
Developed in New Zealand in the early 1900s, tail docking is the
practice of removing part of the solid portion of an animal's
tail. In dairy cattle, tail docking is alleged to improve
milking personnel comfort, cow utter cleanliness, and heightened
milk quality. Further, tail docking is alleged to promote
milking personnel health through the prevention of leptospirosis
a bacterial disease spread by urine from infected animals via
contact with skin abrasions or wounds or contact with mucous
membranes of the eyes, nose, and mouth.
The practice of tail docking has varying restrictions around the
world. It is prohibited in Denmark, Germany, Scotland, Sweden,
and the United Kingdom. Canada recommends that only competent
personnel perform the procedure, and Australia has varying
degrees of regulation from requiring that veterinarians perform
the procedure to outright prohibition.
In the United States, cattle are docked near weaning, most
commonly by rubber band constriction. The banded tail detaches
after 3 to 7 weeks, removing one-third to two-thirds of the
tail.
California law makes the practice of tail docking horses or the
importation of tail-docked horses a misdemeanor.
PROPOSED LAW
SB 135 would make the practice of tail docking cattle a
misdemeanor unless performed by a veterinarian for veterinary
purposes. The veterinarian docking must be performed on an
anesthetized animal to minimize pain, in sanitary conditions,
and in such a way as to minimize long-term pain and suffering.
COMMENTS
1.According to the sponsors of the bill, tail docking causes
acute pain to the animal at the time of docking. In addition
to the pain of the actual procedure, docked cattle lose the
SB 135 - Page 2
ability to protect themselves from flies and other insects as
they no longer have sufficient tail to swat away the insects.
A recent University of California study found that tail
docking does not add any improvement in dairy worker safety
and comfort or the health and cleanliness of the cow's udder.
2.In a recent report by the Humane Society of the United States
(HSUS), they offer an alternative to tail docking of improved
handling, housing management, and seasonal switch trimming.
The switch being the long hairs growing at the end portion of
the cow's tail. While the bill defines docking as cutting the
solid part of the tail, the committee may want to consider
whether the tail docking definition would include switch
trimming.
3.The Senate Rules Committee has doubled referred this bill to
the Senate Public Safety Committee as the second committee of
referral. Therefore, if this measure is approved by this
committee, the motion should include an action to re-refer the
bill to the Senate Committee on Public Safety.
SUPPORT
Animal Place
Animal Protection and Rescue League
Born Free USA
California Veterinary Medical Association
Farm Sanctuary
Food Empowerment Project
Humane Society of the United States
Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association
League of Humane Voters
Paw Pac
San Diego Animal Advocates
The Humane Farming Action Fund
United Animal Nations
OPPOSITION
None received