BILL ANALYSIS SB 156 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 24, 2009 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE Jose Solorio, Chair SB 156 (Wright) - As Amended: June 16, 2009 SUBJECT : Insurance fraud prevention and detection. SUMMARY : Authorizes the Insurance Commissioner (IC) to convene meetings with representatives of insurers to discuss suspected or completed acts of insurance fraud. Specifically, this bill : 1)Authorizes the IC to convene meetings with representatives of insurance companies to discuss specific information concerning suspected, anticipated, or completed acts of insurance fraud. 2)Specifies that information shared during the course of those meetings that is related to suspected, anticipated, or completed acts of insurance fraud, in the absence of fraud or malice, shall not make a person subject to civil liability for libel, slander, or any other relevant cause of action. EXISTING LAW : 1)Requires insurance companies to operate a unit or division to investigate possible fraudulent claims by insured persons. 2)Requires an insurance company, upon a written request by an authorized governmental agency, to release all relevant information possessed by the insurance company related to any specific insurance fraud. "Authorized governmental agency" includes various state agencies including the California Department of Insurance (CDI), police departments, and county district attorneys. 3)Provides insurers with immunity from civil liability for libel or slander for releasing information to authorized governmental agencies about specific insurance fraud. The only exceptions to this immunity are in the event of fraud or malice on the part of the insurer. FISCAL EFFECT : None. COMMENTS : SB 156 Page 2 1)Purpose of bill. This bill would implement a recommendation of the CDI's Advisory Task Force on Insurance Fraud. The author states that the purpose of the bill is to allow the IC to convene meetings with insurers, where the IC or a designated deputy commissioner would be in constant attendance, to discuss suspected or confirmed cases of fraud in order to share basic information about insurance trends and other information to help reduce insurance fraud. The bill aims to enable people who see different parts of the fraud puzzle to put their pieces together to reveal patterns of fraud. 2)Background. This bill is sponsored by the author who notes that in May 2008, the CDI Advisory Task Force on Insurance Fraud made a series of recommendations to the Insurance Commissioner to help reduce insurance fraud, including strengthening the immunity provisions for insurance companies that report suspected fraud and cooperate in investigations in accordance with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Insurance Fraud Prevention Model Act. Additionally, the May 2008 report of the CDI Advisory Task Force on Insurance Fraud, entitled "Reducing Insurance Fraud in California," reported the following: a) insurance fraud in California totals over $15 billion each year, and results in higher insurance costs, higher taxes, and lower levels of government services; b) insurance fraud is the second most costly crime in America; c) insurance fraud can directly affect innocent, law-abiding people, dramatically changing their lives forever. For example, fraud perpetrators have staged collisions resulting in loss of life, and have driven companies out of business by damaging their bottom line and their hard-earned reputation. Vulnerable groups such as seniors, recent immigrants, or small businesses may be special targets of sophisticated swindlers. 3)Clarifying technical amendment. The bill proposes that in meetings of the IC and insurance companies where information is shared related to suspected or completed acts of insurance fraud, that the information shared, in the absence of fraud or SB 156 Page 3 malice , shall not make a person subject to civil liability for libel or slander. The manner in which it is written in the bill raises the question: If no fraud or malice is found, would the immunity be lost? The purpose of the bill can be made clearer by the following re-phrasing on page 2, lines 29 - 33 of the bill: Information shared during the course of those meetings that is related to suspected, anticipated, or completed acts of insurance fraud, in the absence of fraud or malice on the part of the representatives of insurance companies and the commissioner or designated deputy, shall not make person subject to civil liability for libel, slander, or any other relevant cause of action. 4 Technical amendment. The findings and declarations portion of the bill contains a sentence relating only to the workers' compensation program but the substantive part of the bill relates to many lines of insurance. It is suggested that on page 2 of the bill, lines 5 - 6, the following line be deleted: Workers' compensation business accounted for 11.5 billion dollars ($11,500,000,000) of that business as of 2006. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support California Peace Officers' Association California Police Chiefs Association CNA Insurance District Attorney of San Diego County Personal Insurance Federation of California Opposition None received. Analysis Prepared by : Manny Hernandez / INS. / (916) 319-2086