BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 156|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 156
          Author:   Wright (D)
          Amended:  6/30/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  5-0, 5/12/09
          AYES:  Corbett, Harman, Florez, Leno, Walters

           SENATE BANKING, FINANCE, AND INS. COMMITTEE  :  11-0, 5/6/09
          AYES:  Calderon, Cogdill, Correa, Cox, Florez, Harman,  
            Kehoe, Liu, Lowenthal, Padilla, Wolk
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Runner

           SENATE FLOOR  :  35-0, 5/21/09
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Calderon,  
            Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham, DeSaulnier,  
            Ducheny, Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Hollingsworth, Huff,  
            Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod,  
            Padilla, Pavley, Runner, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland,  
            Walters, Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Cedillo, Harman, Oropeza, Romero,  
            Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  77-0, 8/20/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Insurance:  fraud prevention and detection

           SOURCE  :     Los Angeles Attorneys Office


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes the Insurance Commissioner  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 156
                                                                Page  
          2

          to convene meetings with representatives of insurers to  
          discuss suspected or completed acts of insurance fraud. 

           Assembly Amendments  specify that only the Insurance  
          Commissioner may call the meeting with insurance  
          representatives instead of both the Insurance Commission or  
          District Attorney, and recast and clarify the liability  
          provisions of the bill. 

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law:

          1. Imposes upon insurers an obligation to report suspected  
             violations of law to appropriate local law enforcement  
             agencies.

          2. Provides immunity from civil liability to insurers who  
             provide information concerning specific instances of  
             insurance fraud in response to a written request from  
             specified law enforcement officials.

          3. This provision applies to all classes of insurance fraud  
             other than workers compensation fraud and auto insurance  
             fraud. 

          4. Information provided to a law enforcement officer  
             pursuant to this law is not a part of any public record  
             and shall not be released until released as part of a  
             criminal or civil proceeding.

          This bill:

          1. States legislative intent that a Department of Insurance  
             Advisory Task Force on Fraud reported in 2008 that  
             insurance fraud costs Californians 15 billion dollars  
             per year, or an average of more than $500 dollars per  
             resident per year, and makes related findings.

          2. Authorizes the Insurance Commissioner to convene  
             meetings with representatives of insurance companies to  
             discuss specific information concerning suspected,  
             anticipated, or completed acts of insurance fraud.








                                                                SB 156
                                                                Page  
          3

          3. Specifies that information shared during the course of  
             those meetings regarding specific suspected,  
             anticipated, or completed acts of insurance fraud, in  
             the absence of fraud or malice, shall not make a person  
             subject to civil liability for libel, slander, or any  
             other relevant cause of action.
           
          Background

           In May 2008 the Advisory Task Force on Insurance Fraud of  
          the Department of Insurance issued a report on "Reducing  
          Insurance Fraud in California".  Its notable findings  
          included:  (1) statewide cost of fraud is over 15 Billion  
          dollars per year or more than 500 dollars per resident;  
          (2)fraud results in higher insurance premiums, higher  
          taxes, higher prices and lower levels of government  
          services; (3)            insurance fraud is the second most  
          costly crime in our country, after tax evasion, according  
          to the National Insurance Crime Bureau; (4)there is no  
          stereotype or profile of people who commit insurance fraud  
          and can be committed in many forms by individuals,  
          businesses and criminal organizations.

          A specific recommendation of the Advisory Task Force was to  
          "strengthen the immunity provisions for companies that  
          report suspected fraud and cooperate in investigations in  
          accordance with the National Association of Insurance  
          Commissioners Insurance Fraud Prevention Model Act.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  8/24/09)

          Los Angeles District Attorney's Office (source)
          California Peace Officer's Association
          California Police Chief's Association
          Employers' Fraud Task Force
          Integrated Healthcare Services
          Personal Insurance Federation of California
          San Diego District Attorney


           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office writes:   







                                                                SB 156
                                                                Page  
          4

          "According to a May 2008, report by the Insurance  
          Commissioner's Advisory Task Force on Insurance Fraud,  
          insurance fraud in California totals over $15 billion each  
          year, costing each resident an average of more than $500  
          per year.  Many cases of suspected fraud go undetected or  
          unprosecuted due to a lack of information.  The language as  
          introduced is based on the Model Act of the National  
          Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).

          "These discussions among insurers will be convened by the  
          Department of Insurance or a District Attorney.  Because  
          everything occurs in the presence of law enforcement, these  
          discussions will not devolve into conspiracies among  
          insurers.  These are not a threat to the legitimate  
          interests of employers, workers, trial attorneys, or  
          medical providers.  The purpose of the bill is to allow  
          people who see different parts of a puzzle to put their  
          pieces together to reveal patterns of fraud.  It is  
          understandable that someone who is usually on the opposing  
          side from the insurers to be concerned about their acting  
          in concert.  These meetings convened by law enforcement  
          will not become conspiracies but will help to fight  
          insurance fraud. 

          The San Diego County District Attorney supports the measure  
          and writes that it "will provide the Department of  
          Insurance and prosecutors with a new tool to help deter and  
          discover insurance fraud."  The office "handles hundreds of  
          these cases.  Typically, they are complex, time-consuming,  
          and expensive to investigate and prosecute.  [SB 156] gives  
          us a specific tool to prevent, detect and investigate these  
          costly crimes by allowing certain persons to share  
          information about fraud while being protected from civil  
          liability."    

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The Consumer Attorneys of  
          California opposes this bill, writing:  "This bill would  
          create an unnecessary immunity to protect meetings convened  
          by the Department of Insurance or a district attorney to  
          discuss trends in insurance fraud with private insurers.   
          While we appreciate the desire for frank and open  
          discussions, it is not at all clear why an immunity is  
          necessary.  First, we have not heard of any other code  
          section where discussions of this sort are immunized.  This  







                                                                SB 156
                                                                Page  
          5

          seems a rather novel and sweeping immunity that would be  
          quite unusual.  Second, we are not aware of any litigation  
          in this area that should prompt a statutory response; it  
          appears to be addressing a problem that has never arisen.   
          Third, the bill's findings refer to the need to have frank  
          discussions about workers' compensation fraud, yet the bill  
          does not actually cover discussions about workers'  
          compensation.  Fourth, the bill immunizes all information  
          shared, including "possible evidence of other criminal  
          activity." This broad language goes well beyond the topic  
          of insurance fraud. 

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon,  
            DeVore, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu,  
            Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning,  
            Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva,  
            Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Duvall, Bass, Vacancy


          JJA:do  8/24/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****