BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 324|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 324
          Author:   Cedillo (D)
          Amended:  6/11/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/14/09
          AYES: Leno, Benoit, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  
            Wright

           SENATE FLOOR  :  37-0, 4/20/09
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Cedillo,  
            Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham, DeSaulnier,  
            Ducheny, Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman, Hollingsworth,  
            Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete  
            McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley, Romero, Runner,  
            Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland, Walters, Wiggins, Wolk,  
            Wright, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Calderon, Wyland, Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  76-1, 6/25/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Counterfeit goods

           SOURCE  :     Shelter Partnership, Inc.


           DIGEST  :    This bill specifically provides that counterfeit  
          goods, with specified exceptions, may, at the consent of  
          the trademark owner, be donated to charity, rather than  
          destroyed.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 324
                                                                Page  
          2

           Assembly Amendments  exclude recordings or audiovisual  
          works, as defined.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law states that any person who  
          willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly  
          possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered  
          with the California Secretary of State or registered on the  
          United States Patent and Trademark Office shall be  
          punishable as follows:

          1.If the offense involves less than 1,000 of the articles  
            with a total retail value less than the standard for  
            grand theft (over $400 - $487), the defendant is guilty  
            of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than  
            $5,000, imprisonment in a county jail for up to one year,  
            or by both.  If the defendant is a corporation, by a fine  
            of not more than $100,000.

          2.When the crime involves 1,000 or more articles, or has a  
            total retail value that meets the standard for grand  
            theft (over $400 - $487), the crime is an alternate  
            felony-misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in a  
            county jail for up to one year, or in the state prison  
            for 16 months, two years, three years, by a fine not to  
            exceed $250,000, or both.  If the defendant is a  
            corporation, the maximum fine is $500,000.  (Penal Code  
            Section 350, subd. (a).)

          Existing law provides that a repeated violation of the  
          counterfeit trademark statute is an alternate  
          felony-misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than  
          $50,000, imprisonment in a county jail for not more than  
          one year, or in the state prison for 16 months, or two or  
          three years, or both.  If the defendant is a corporation,  
          the maximum fine is $200,000.  (Penal Code Section 350,  
          subd. (b).)

          Existing law provides that where a defendant is convicted  
          of a trademark counterfeiting, the court shall order the  
          forfeiture and destruction of all counterfeit marks and all  
          counterfeit items.  The court, with specified exceptions  
          for community property vehicles, shall also order  
          forfeiture and destruction or other disposition of all  
          means of making the marks and all other devices for making  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 324
                                                                Page  
          3

          or transporting the marks used in connection with the  
          violation.

          Existing law describes "fair use" of a trademark, which is  
          not subject to prosecution or a civil action, as any of the  
          following:

          1.Advertising or promotion that permits consumers to  
            compare goods or services;

          2.identifying and parodying, criticizing, or commenting  
            upon the famous mark owner or the goods or services of  
            the famous mark owner;.

          3.noncommercial use of the mark; and

          4.all forms of new reporting and news commentary.   
            (Business and Professions Code Section 14247.)

          Existing federal law provides that it is a crime to  
          "traffic" or "attempt to traffic" is counterfeit goods.   
          The crime is punishable by a fine of up to $2 million,  
          imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both.  The maximum fine  
          for a corporation or an entity other than an individual is  
          $5 million.  Repeated convictions are punishable by  
          imprisonment for up to 20 years, a fine of up to $5  
          million, or both.  Where the convicted defendant of  
          repeated violations is other than an individual the maximum  
          fine is $15 million.  (18 U.S.C. Section 2320.)

          Existing federal law provides the following property is  
          subject to forfeiture following a defendant's conviction  
          for trafficking in counterfeit goods:  the proceeds of the  
          crime; any of the defendant's property used or intended to  
          be used in the crime; any article bearing a counterfeit  
          mark.  (18 U.S.C. Section 2320(b).)

          This bill provides that upon a request by law enforcement  
          and with consent from the trademark registrant, the court  
          may consider a motion to for donation of counterfeit goods  
          to a non-profit organization for distribution to indigent  
          persons at no charge.  This provision excludes recordings  
          or audiovisual works as defined in Section 653w of the  
          Penal Code.

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 324
                                                                Page  
          4


           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  6/25/09)

          Shelter Partnership, Inc. (source)
          Western Center on Law and Poverty
           Minister of God and Christ Jesus Foundation
          Substance Abuse Foundation of Long Beach, Inc.
          Community Action Partnership of San Bernardino County
          David and Margaret Youth and Family Services
          Taxpayers for Improving Public Safety
          Union Rescue Mission
          Los Angeles Mission
          Fred Jordan Missions

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  6/25/09)

          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office 
          International Anti-Counterfeiting Coalition

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          "The underground market for counterfeit goods is sizable  
          and growing rapidly.  In 2007 U.S. customs officials seized  
          $197 million in counterfeit goods, up 27% from the previous  
          year.  The county Economic Development Corporation  
          estimates about $2 billion worth of counterfeit goods are  
          sold annually in Los Angeles alone.

          "Yet, in our state there are over 150,000 individuals and  
          family members who are homeless on any given night.  This  
          number of homeless Californians will likely grow in the  
          next two years because of loss of jobs and the impact of  
          home foreclosures.

          "SB 324 provides for a practical method in aiding our  
          state's homeless by repurposing counterfeit shoes and  
          clothes after their confiscation and with the trademark  
          owner's consent.  The donation of these items to non profit  
          agencies will fill the paucity of public funding created by  
          budget cuts homeless and women's shelters face.  This bill  
          is also an environmentally sound fit to noncommercial  
          redistribution of the items.  Landfills are already at  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 324
                                                                Page  
          5

          capacity and the destruction of goods adds to the immense  
          waste in our communities.

          "Under current law counterfeit items must be destroyed. In  
          some instances items have been donated by the Los Angeles  
          City Attorney's office to organizations serving the  
          homeless with the permission of the trademark owners.  The  
          organizations taking possession of counterfeit goods go to  
          great lengths to ensure the items do not re-enter commerce  
          by removing tags and imprinting the pieces with an  
          indelible stamp.  However, there is a reluctance to  
          continue this practice because the statute calls for  
          destruction regardless of trademark owner's consent and  
          there is not sufficient case law to guide the protocol for  
          donating goods.  SB 324 will take an existing problem and  
          transform it into a transparent solution for non profit  
          agencies that serve the homeless and indigents in our  
          communities."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Arambula, Beall, Bill Berryhill, Tom  
            Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield, Brownley,  
            Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter, Chesbro,  
            Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon, DeVore,  
            Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher, Fong,  
            Fuentes, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian,  
            Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning,  
            Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva,  
            Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NOES:  Anderson
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Lieu, Torres, Vacancy


          RJG:cm  7/2/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****


                                                           CONTINUED