BILL ANALYSIS SB 392 Page 1 Date of Hearing: June 16, 2009 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS Mary Hayashi, Chair SB 392 (Florez) - As Amended: April 21, 2009 SENATE VOTE : 36-0 SUBJECT : Contractors: limited liability companies. SUMMARY : Allows licensed contractors to organize their company under the laws of a limited liability corporation (LLC). Specifically, this bill : 1)Includes LLC within the definition of "person" for the purposes of the Contractors State License Law (Contractors Law). 2)Defines "qualifying person," "qualifying individual," or "qualifier" as an individual who qualifies for a contractor's license. 3)Authorizes the issuance of a contractor's license to a LLC, and adds license requirements that mirror those of a corporation. 4) Requires a LLC to provide security for claims with at least one of the following: a) The total aggregate limit of liability under the policy or policies of insurance for a limited liability company that employs five or fewer licensed persons shall not be less than $1 million dollars, and for a LLC that employs more than five licensees rendering professional services on behalf of the company, an additional $100,000 of insurance shall be obtained for each licensee except that the maximum amount of insurance is not required to exceed $5 million dollars in any one designated period. Defines "designated period" to mean a policy year or period less than 12 months; b) Maintain in trust or bank escrow, cash, bank certificates of deposit, United States Treasury obligations, bank letters of credit, or bonds of insurance SB 392 Page 2 or surety companies as security for payment of liabilities imposed by law for damages arising out of all claims. The maximum amount of security for a LLC that employing up to five licensed persons shall not be less than $1 million. For each additional licensee employed beyond five licensees, an additional $100,000 of security shall be obtained up a maximum of $5 million; c) At the time of licensing, a LLC shall file with the registrar all necessary information and documentation demonstrating compliance with the financial security requirements; and, d) If the security requirements of this section are satisfied wholly, or in part, with an insurance policy, then a certification of coverage shall be submitted to the commissioner by the licensee or applicant, and signed by an authorized agent or employee of the insurer. 5)Requires that if a LLC license is suspended, each person within the company identified shall be personally liable up to $1 million for damages against third parties in connection with the company's performance during the period of suspension, for any act or contract where a license is required. 6)Requires that if a LLC license has been suspended or revoked, but stayed, the applicant or licensee must file or have on file a contractor's bond in a sum fixed by the registrar. The sum shall not be less than $15,000 or more than 10 times that amount. 7)Requires that the qualifying individual for a LLC shall not be required to file or have on file a qualifying individual's bond if he or she owns at least a 10% interest in the LLC and certifies this fact on a form prescribed by the registrar. 8)Requires a LLC to include information of the liability insurance or security it maintains at a financial institution for change orders and service and repair contracts. 9)Makes this Act operative on July 1, 2011. SB 392 Page 3 10)Makes other technical and conforming changes. EXISTING LAW : 1)Provides for the licensure and regulation of contractors by the Contractors State License Board (CSLB). 2)Defines "person" for the purpose of the Contractors Law to include an individual, a firm, co-partnership, corporation, association or other organization, and prohibits any unlicensed person from engaging in business or acting as a contractor. 3)Authorizes the issuance of a contractors' license to individual owners, co-partnerships, corporations, and joint ventures, and requires applicants to demonstrate degree of knowledge, experience, and qualifications. 4)Establishes the Beverly-Killea Limited Liability Company Act (LLC Act), to provide for LLCs to organize and conduct business in California, and allows foreign LLCs (any LLC organized outside of California) to register to conduct business in the state. 5)Provides that a LLC may engage in any lawful activity except banking, insurance, or trust company operations or the offering of professional services for which a license, certificate, or registration is required, unless expressly authorized. FISCAL EFFECT : Unknown COMMENTS : Purpose of the bill . According to the author's office, "The existing contractors license law is archaic as most states allow a LLC to hold a contractor's license - California law is an impediment to established nationwide businesses doing business in the state. The LLC form of business has needed flexibility for distribution of profits and losses separate from control and ownership which benefits commerce with no foreseeable detriment. "LLCs are a desired entity for construction companies, as they are with many other industries, primarily because LLCs provide SB 392 Page 4 the flexibility to distribute profits and losses to owners without double taxation, in a manner similar to corporations electing 'S' status under the Internal Revenue Code, but without the limited shareholder qualifications (i.e., 'S' corporation shareholders must be individuals with very limited exceptions and the number of shareholders is limited to 100)? Similarly, a 'S' corporation's largest shareholders receive the largest share of profits. LLCs allow owners to dictate how profits are split and taxed without dictation by the percentage ownership. "This improved estate planning and profit sharing flexibility will have no negative impact on consumers of construction services in California. A LLC provides liability protection for the personal assets of owners equivalent to, but not more than, that afforded to corporations." Background . The CSLB licenses and regulates California's construction industry. There are more than 316,000 licensed contractors in the state, in 43 different licensing classifications. The Contractors Law was adopted in 1929, prior to the adoption of the LLC Act in 1994 that established LLCs. The sponsors contend that at the time the Contractors Law was adopted, the Legislature did not have the option of inserting LLCs into its provisions. The sponsors argue that the exclusion of LLCs from the Contractors Law was not a calculated decision and 14 years after passage of the LLC Act, LLCs comprise an indelible part of the business landscape in California and throughout the United States. The sponsors claim that therefore, this bill is necessary so that LLCs may be utilized in the construction industry just as they are in countless other industries throughout California. The rationale for the exclusion of professionals to organize as a LLC was apparently that service providers who harm others by their misconduct, incompetence, or negligence should not be able to limit their liability by operating as an LLC and thus become potentially judgement-proof. Based upon these provisions of law, it has been commonly understood that the boards and bureaus under the DCA are prohibited from issuing a license, certification, or registration to an entity organized as a LLC. Currently, general contractors are allowed to organize as one of the following legal entities: sole proprietorship, general partnership (GP), limited partnership (LP), C-Corporation, and SB 392 Page 5 S-Corporation. Under current law, the CSLB may issue a license to an individual, a partnership, a corporation, or a joint venture that has met the requirements enumerated above. SB 392 would add a LLC to this list, with the CSLB treating a license applicant in almost all respects as a corporation, including that the qualifying individual must own at least a 10% ownership interest in the LLC in order to qualify for the license for the LLC. California's Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) law, however, has always sought to strike a balance between allowing professional licensed service providers to operate in a mode offering both tax and liability-limiting advantages while preserving to an appropriate degree the ability of a party injured by professional negligence to recover damages for that injury. Thus, an insurance requirement has always been imposed upon professional licensees wishing to operate as an LLP. Because of the limited liability attributes of an LLP, an injured person can no longer rely on the joint and several liability of the partners and their personal assets, but must look to the assets of the LLP. To ensure adequate but not necessarily complete recovery in all claims, the insurance requirement is added as a condition of being able to operate as an LLP. Thus, even if the LLP has few assets because the profits are regularly distributed to its members, the required insurance is available to pay tort damages. Thus, current law authorizes attorneys, accountants, and architects, all of whom provide professional services under the Business and Professions Code, to organize themselves as LLPs and to provide professional services, so long as the LLP maintains a net worth of at least $10 million, and obtains liability insurance coverage or maintains bank deposits of $1 million for partnerships of five or fewer licensees and an additional $100,000 for each additional licensee up to a maximum of $5 million for all others. LLPs are required to register with the Secretary of State, and LLP partners are only personally liable for those torts in which they personally participated and are not jointly and severally liable for any other torts or debts of the partnership. The sponsors claim that allowing contractors to operate as a LLC will offer a flexible structure for owners and shareholders by: removing the restrictions of the type and number of members SB 392 Page 6 allowed, removing compensation restrictions, removing accumulated earnings penalty, distributing income and deductions in percentages that differ from ownership, offering flexibility in joint venture planning, and making it easier to pass a business onto the next generation In regular corporations, shareholders are subject to double taxation because both the entity and the shareholders are taxed on the increased value of the property when the property is sold or the corporation is liquidated. LLCs avoid this double tax because the LLC does not pay a tax on its income; only members are taxed. Support . According to the sponsors, "Existing law authorizes businesses in California to be organized as LLCs with the exception of professional services. In order to do business as a licensed contractor, a single person must successfully complete the exam and serve as the 'qualifier' for the construction entity. This entity can be operated as a sole proprietor, joint venture, partnership, or a 'C' Corporation. Since contracting is considered a professional license, contractors are not allowed to do business as a LLC? LLCs are desirable to the construction industry because LLCs provide business flexibility to distribute profits and losses to owners without double taxation. This is done in a manner similar to 'S' corporations without the limited shareholder qualifications of a 'S' corporation. Organizations such as LLCs also provide improved estate planning and profit-sharing flexibility." According to the California Landscape Contractors Association (CLCA), "Several previous attempts to authorize the CSLB to license LLCs have stumbled over two concerns. First, that work performed by a construction trades contractor could be construed as a 'professional service' and therefore may be excluded under the LLC Act from being provided by a LLC. Second, that consumers of construction services may be harmed if an inadequately capitalized or underinsured LLC is found liable for a construction defect or some other business-related tort claim. "SB 392 addresses these concerns by amending the Contractors Law to specifically include LLCs as eligible to be licensed as contractors, and requiring licensed contractors who elect to organize as a LLC to provide security for any claims by maintaining at least $1 million of liability insurance or hold SB 392 Page 7 at least $500,000 in liquid assets and/or an equivalent surety bond. "Finally, we note that other professional service providers in California, notably attorneys, accountants, and architects, have been allowed to organize as LLCs subject to similar security requirements as proposed in this measure. There is simply no reason that contractors should not be treated in the same way." Prior Legislation . SB 1225 (Harman), Chapter 114, Statutes of 2008, authorizes the organization and operation of cemetery authorities as limited liability companies as long as they carry liability insurance policies or other security in the amount of $1 million. AB 2914 (Leno), Chapter 426, Statutes of 2006, extends the sunset date on licensed architects' ability to organize as LLPs to January 1, 2012, and increases the minimum liability coverage requirements for architectural LLPs to $1 million (from $500,000) as of January 1, 2008. SB 1337 (Correa) of 2008 was similar to SB 392, but lacked the insurance and/or escrow deposit requirements for the LLC and its members. The bill died in Senate Judiciary Committee. AB 2401 (Miller) of 1996 would have allowed contractors to operate as LLCs. The bill died in Senate Business and Professions Committee. SB 141 (Beverly) Chapter 57, Statutes of 1995, would have added numerous categories of state regulated professional service providers to the types of businesses that could operate as LLCs. However, opponents of SB 141 and that bill's sponsor were unable to agree as to whether or not professional or licensed LLC service providers should carry adequate insurance to ensure their financial ability to respond to legal judgments for contract or tort claims. Consequently, those additional classes of businesses were amended out of SB 141 prior to its enactment. Double-referred . This bill is double-referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : Support SB 392 Page 8 Associated General Contractors (AGC) of California (sponsor) AGC-San Diego (sponsor) Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) of California Associated General Contractors of California (AGC) California Fence Contractors' Association California Landscape Contractors Association (CLCA) Engineering & Utility Contractors Association (EUCA) Engineering Contractors' Association Flasher/Barricade Association Golden State Builders Exchange (GSBE) Marin Builders' Association Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by : Joanna Gin / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301