BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 406|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 406
          Author:   DeSaulnier (D)
          Amended:  5/28/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE  :  3-2, 4/15/09
          AYES:  Wiggins, Kehoe, Wolk
          NOES:  Cox, Aanestad

           SENATE TRANSPORTATION & HOUSING COMMITTEE  :  6-4, 4/28/09
          AYES:  Lowenthal, DeSaulnier, Kehoe, Pavley, Simitian, Wolk
          NOES:  Huff, Ashburn, Harman, Hollingsworth
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Oropeza

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  7-5, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Hancock, Leno, Oropeza,  
            Yee
          NOES:  Cox, Denham, Runner, Walters, Wyland
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk


           SUBJECT :    Land use:  environmental quality

           SOURCE  :     California Association of Councils of  
          Governments


           DIGEST  :    This bill authorizes regions to impose a one  
          dollar or two dollar surcharge on vehicle registrations to  
          pay for regional land use planning activities.  This bill  
          makes changes to the membership and duties of the Office of  
          Planning and Research's Planning Advisory and Assistance  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          2

          Council.

           ANALYSIS  :    

          Existing law establishes a basic vehicle registration fee  
          of $34, plus a $22 surcharge for additional personnel for  
          the California Highway Patrol (CHP), and authorizes local  
          agencies to impose separate vehicle registration fee  
          surcharges in their respective jurisdictions for a variety  
          of special programs, including:

          1. One dollar for service authorities for freeway  
             emergencies.
          2. One dollar for deterring and prosecuting vehicle theft.
          3. Up to seven dollars for air quality programs.
          4. One dollar for removing abandoned vehicles.
          5. One dollar for fingerprint identification programs.

          Existing law permits local agencies to form joint powers  
          agencies (JPAs). Cities and counties in regions have  
          exercised this authority to form JPAs called councils of  
          government (COGs) to implement regional planning activities  
          required under state law, including regional housing needs  
          assessments and regional transportation plans.  COGs  
          generally serve as federally recognized metropolitan  
          planning organizations (MPOs) for transportation planning  
          purposes, although there are exceptions.  For example, in  
          the nine-county San Francisco Bay region, the Association  
          of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is the COG that prepares the  
          regional housing needs assessment, but the Metropolitan  
          Transportation Commission (MTC) is the region's MPO.

          SB 375 (Steinberg), Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008, required  
          the Air Resources Board (ARB), by September 30, 2010, to  
          provide each region that has a MPO with a greenhouse gas  
          emission reduction target for the automobile and light  
          truck sector for 2020 and 2035, respectively.  Each MPO, in  
          turn, is required to include within its regional  
          transportation plan (RTP) a sustainable communities  
          strategy (SCS) designed to achieve the ARB targets for  
          greenhouse gas emission reduction.  If the SCS does not  
          achieve the reduction target, the MPO must prepare an  
          alternative planning strategy. 








                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          3

          This bill:

          1. Allows an MPO, a COG, or a county transportation  
             commission and a subregional COG jointly preparing an  
             SCS to impose a surcharge of one or two dollars on  
             vehicles registered in its jurisdiction, upon adoption  
             of a resolution authorizing the surcharge as specified,  
             to fund the development and implementation of an SCS or  
             a regional blueprint plan to identify land use  
             strategies to reduce the use of motor vehicles and  
             thereby reduce emissions into the environment.  The  
             regional entity shall adopt a resolution imposing the  
             surcharge, except that:

             A.    In the San Francisco Bay Area, both MTC and ABAG  
                shall have to adopt a resolution and agree how to  
                divide the revenue received.

             B.    In the jurisdiction of the Southern California  
                Association of Governments, both a county  
                transportation commission and a subregional COG  
                shall have to adopt a resolution and agree how to  
                divide the revenue received.

          2. States the surcharge that exceeds one dollar, in a  
             jurisdiction with a population greater than 300,000,  
             shall be used to provide grants to cities and counties  
             for planning and projects related to implementation of a  
             regional blueprint plan.

          3. Requires an agency imposing the vehicle fee to contract  
             with DMV to pay for initial setup and programming costs  
             identified by the department.  These costs will be  
             reimbursed to the agency imposing the fee from surcharge  
             revenues collected.

          4. Directs a regional entity imposing a surcharge to remit  
             five percent of all the revenue it derives from the  
             surcharge to the Planning Advisory and Assistance  
             Council to perform the functions specified.

          5. Directs DMV to collect the surcharge, deduct its costs  
             of administering the surcharge, and transmit the  
             remaining revenue quarterly to the MPO, COG, or county  







                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          4

             transportation and subregional COG that imposed it.

           Planning Advisory and Assistance Council (PAAC)
           
          Existing law establishes the Office of Planning and  
          Research (OPR) within the governor's office as the state's  
          comprehensive planning agency, responsible for helping  
          local and regional officials with land use planning.  State  
          law charges OPR with coordinating state agencies' planning  
          activities, including directing OPR to prepare every four  
          years a State Environmental Goals and Policies Report, a  
          20- to 30-year look ahead at state growth and development.   


          Existing law creates the Planning Advisory and Assistance  
          Council (PAAC) to assist OPR in various land-use planning  
          related activities, including development of the State  
          Environmental Goals and Policies Report.  OPR's Director  
          appoints the PAAC members, which must include:

          1. Three city representatives, nominated by the League of  
             California Cities.

          2. Three county representatives, nominated by the  
             California State Association of Counties.

          3. One representative from each of the regional planning  
             districts designated by OPR.

          4. One representative of Indian tribes with reservations in  
             California.

          Existing law creates the Strategic Growth Council,  
          consisting of:

          1. Director of OPR.
          2. Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency.
          3. Secretary of the Environmental Protection Agency.
          4. Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing  
             Agency.
          5. Secretary of the California Health and Human Services  
             Agency.
          6. A public member, appointed by the Governor.








                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          5

          The Strategic Growth Council coordinates the activities and  
          funding programs of its member state agencies to improve  
          air and water quality, improve natural resources  
          protection, increase the availability of affordable  
          housing, improve transportation, meet the state's  
          greenhouse gas emission goals, encourage sustainable land  
          use planning, and revitalize urban and community centers.   
          The council must recommend policies to the governor, state  
          agencies, and the Legislature to encourage the development  
          of sustainable communities and provide local governments  
          and regional agencies with data to assist in planning  
          sustainable communities.

          This bill:

          1. Changes the PAAC's membership to be:

             A.    Three city representatives, nominated by the  
                League of California Cities.

             B.    Three county representatives, nominated by the  
                California State Association of Counties.

             C.    Seven representatives of specified regional  
                planning organizations.

             D.    One member of the State Air Resources Board.

             E.    One member of the California Transportation  
                Commission.

             F.    One member of the California Energy Commission.

             G.    One member appointed by the Speaker of the  
                Assembly.

             H.    One member appointed by the Senate Rules  
                Committee.

             I.    One representative of Indian tribes with  
                reservations in California.

          2. Assigns the PAAC five new duties, as follows:








                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          6

             A.    Work with the Strategic Growth Council to  
                facilitate the implementation of regional blueprint  
                projects.

             B.    Facilitate coordination between regional  
                blueprint plans and state growth and infrastructure  
                funding plans by developing recommendations to  
                specified state agencies.

             C.    Receive reports, including the state's five-year  
                infrastructure plan.

             D.    Report to the Legislature on how state agencies  
                implement the state's planning priorities.

             E.    Report to the Legislature on regional  
                performance measures that evaluate each region  
                based on the PAAC's criteria for improving the  
                regions' employment, environmental protection,  
                education, housing, and mobility.

             F.    Directs the PAAC to start performing these new  
                duties when it receives sufficient funding from  
                MPOs, COGs, or county transportation commissions  
                and subregional councils of government jointly  
                preparing an SCS.

             G.    Directs the Strategic Growth Council in  
                performing its duties to consult with the PAAC.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                2009-10     2010-11     
           2011-12   Fund

           DMV programming                    $300-$400*$100*Special*
            & admin      

          Maximum local assessments                     







                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          7

          ($62,728)($62,728)  Local**
            (revenue gain)

          PAAC new duties     all costs covered by five percent  
                              allocation of fees collected

          * Motor Vehicle Account (as proposed to be amended, first  
          year costs covered by imposing agency through contract with  
          DMV; ongoing costs deducted from fee revenues)

          ** Staff notes that the local assessment revenue gain shown  
          here is based upon approval of the assessment in every  
          region in the state.  Actual revenues will depend upon the  
          number of entities approving an assessment and the number  
          of vehicles registered in those areas.  For purposes of  
          example, if only the Association of Bay Area Governments  
          (with 6,061,374 fee-paid vehicle registrations) approved an  
          assessment of $2, annual local revenues would be  
          $12,122,748 with five percent of these revenues ($606,137)  
          transferred to PAAC to cover costs related to duties  
          imposed by this bill.

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/29/09)

          California Association of Councils of Governments (source)
          Association of Bay Area Governments
          American Federation of State, County and Municipal  
          Employees
          California League of Conservation Voters

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/29/09)

          California New Car Dealers Association
          California Taxpayers Association
          Orange County Division of the League of Cities
          San Diego Association of Governments

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The author's office notes that SB  
          375 (Steinberg) Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008, requires  
          that each MPO and COG develop an SCS reflecting preferred  
          land uses as part of its regional transportation plan.  The  
          SCS will build on regional blueprints already being  
          prepared in these regions.  Regional blueprints are the  
          result of voluntary cooperative efforts by cities and  







                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          8

          counties in a region to develop a coordinated and  
          integrated approach to land use planning.  Regional  
          blueprints seek to address the following: mobility,  
          congestion, transit use, infill development, housing  
          supply, and the presence of farmland and habitat in our  
          communities.

          With California's population predicted to grow by 16  
          million over the next two decades, successfully  
          accommodating this growth depends upon the ability of  
          regional and local governments to attract development  
          projects that promote the goals of regional planning.   
          Regions and cities need state agencies to act in concert  
          with local officials to accomplish these goals and the  
          larger regional and state goals of improved quality of  
          life, air quality, and economic growth.

          To successfully implement SB 375 and its required regional  
          transportation plans that will address greenhouse gas  
          emissions, regional and local governments need resources  
          for strategic planning and opportunities for coordination  
          with state agencies.  The author's office introduced this  
          bill to provide those resources and the opportunity for  
          greater coordination.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California New Car Dealers  
          Association states that California motorists are already  
          overburdened with hidden vehicle fees. In addition to the  
          annual Vehicle License Fee, which will increase from 0.65  
          percent to 1.15 percent of a vehicle's value next month,  
          and annual $34 vehicle registration fees, vehicle owners  
          are also subject to "add-on" fees:  one to seven dollars  
          annual air quality district fee, $20 smog abatement fee for  
          vehicles four model-years old or newer, one dollar annual  
          abandoned vehicle trust fee, $22 annual CHP fee; one dollar  
          annual freeway call box fee; one dollar annual theft  
          deterrence fee; one dollar annual fingerprint  
          identification fee; and, the one dollar.75 per tire  
          California tire fee.  The dealers believe there continues  
          to be no reason to further increase the cost of vehicle  
          ownership in California, unless the voters within the  
          jurisdictions affected elect to tax themselves. 

          The San Diego Association of Governments opposes the bill  







                                                                SB 406
                                                                Page  
          9

          because it would rather have the state impose a uniform fee  
          for the purpose of funding blueprint and SCS work.  
           

          AGB:do  5/29/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****