BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 406 (DeSaulnier)
          As Amended  September 1, 2009
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :21-16  
           
           LOCAL GOVERNMENT    5-2         TRANSPORTATION      8-6         
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Caballero, Arambula,      |Ayes:|Eng, Blumenfield,         |
          |     |Davis, Krekorian, Skinner |     |Buchanan, Furutani,       |
          |     |                          |     |Bonnie Lowenthal,         |
          |     |                          |     |John A. Perez, Solorio,   |
          |     |                          |     |Torlakson                 |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Knight, Duvall            |Nays:|Jeffries, Conway,         |
          |     |                          |     |Galgiani, Garrick,        |
          |     |                          |     |Miller, Niello            |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 

           APPROPRIATIONS      12-5                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|De Leon, Ammiano,         |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Coto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Davis, Fuentes, Hall,     |     |                          |
          |     |John A. Perez, Skinner,   |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Torlakson, Hill  |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |Nays:|Conway, Harkey, Miller,   |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, Audra Strickland |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           
          SUMMARY  :  Authorizes an additional fee of $1 or $2 on vehicle  
          registrations through an existing fee mechanism, and proposes  
          new duties, membership, and funding for the Strategic Growth  
          Council (SGC) and the Planning Advisory and Assistance Council  
          (PAAC).  Specifically, this bill  :   

          1)Adds to the membership of PAAC, the following members:









                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  2


             a)   Seven representatives of regional planning  
               organizations;

             b)   One member of the State Air Resources Board (ARB);

             c)   One member of the California Transportation Commission  
               (CTC);

             d)   One member of the State Energy Resources Conservation  
               and Development Commission;

             e)   One member appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly;  
               and,

             f)   One member appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules.

          2)Provides that representatives on PAAC from regional planning  
            organizations shall be selected by the Director of the  
            Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as specified  
            from:

             a)   Nominees submitted by the regional planning organization  
               and from the governing body of each of the following:

               i)     The Southern California Association of Governments  
                 (SCAG);

               ii)    A member of the governing body for both he  
                 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the  
                 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG);

               iii)   The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG);

               iv)    The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG);  
                 and,

               v)     The San Joaquin Valley Regional Policy Council  
                 (SJVRPC).

             b)   Nominees submitted by the California Association of  
               Councils of Governments (CALCOG) from:

               i)     A metropolitan planning organization (MPO) or  
                 council of governments (COG) that is not identified in 2)  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  3


                 a) above; and,

               ii)    A regional transportation planning agency that is  
                 neither an MPO nor a COG.

          3)Adds new duties to the responsibility of PAAC, including:

             a)   Working with SGC, regional agencies, and with cities and  
               counties to facilitate the implementation of regional  
               blueprint plans;

             b)   Developing and proposing recommendations to SGC, the  
               Department of General Services (DGS), the State Allocation  
               Board, the Department of Housing and Community Development  
               (HCD), the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), CTC,  
               and any other state agencies that affect land use, housing,  
               or transportation in order to facilitate coordination  
               between regional blueprint plans and state growth and  
               infrastructure funding plans and programs that facilitate  
               the implementation of regional blueprint plans;

             c)   Receiving reports, including, but not limited to, a copy  
               of the five-year infrastructure plan; and,

             d)   Reporting to the Legislature on regional performance  
               measures, evaluating the progress of each region of the  
               state in improving results for residents in employment,  
               environmental protection, education, housing, mobility, and  
               other criteria as determined by PAAC.

          4)Specifies that PAAC shall provide the Legislature with updates  
            to the report specified in #3d above periodically, as the PAAC  
            determines is required.

          5)Provides that PAAC shall commence the functions enumerated in  
            3) and 4) above when sufficient funding, as determined by  
            PAAC, exists from revenue transmitted to PAAC by MPOs, COGs,  
            or county transportation commissions and subregional COGs  
            jointly preparing subregional sustainable communities  
            strategies (SCS).
          6)Allows a local air quality management district (AQMD), upon  
            request by an MPO, a COG, or a county transportation  
            commission and a subregional COG jointly preparing a  
            subregional SCS, to request that the DMV increase certain fees  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  4


            on motor vehicle registration by $1 or $2, on a vehicle  
            registered to an owner with an address in its jurisdiction.

          7)Provides that the DMV shall transmit the additional fee  
            revenue to the local AQMD quarterly, after deducting its cost  
            incurred in administering the additional fee from that  
            revenue.

          8)Provides that the local AQMD shall transfer a portion of the  
            revenue after deducting its own reasonable administrative  
            costs not to exceed 2% of the total additional fee revenue, to  
            the MPO, COG, or county transportation commission and  
            subregional COG jointly preparing a subregional SCS that  
            requested that the local AQMD initiate the fee increase.

          9)Provides, in order to impose the additional fee, that the MPO,  
            COG, or county transportation commission and subregional COG  
            jointly preparing a subregional SCS, must adopt a resolution  
            authorizing the additional fee amount.

          10)Provides that a resolution by the MTC or ABAG to authorize  
            the additional fee amount must be jointly adopted by  
            resolution of both entities, and the revenue from the  
            additional fee amount shall be divided in accordance with an  
            agreement between these two entities.

          11)Provides that a resolution by a county transportation  
            commission or a subregional COG within the jurisdiction of the  
            SCAG shall be jointly adopted by resolution of both entities,  
            and the revenue from the additional fee amount shall be  
            divided in accordance with an agreement between the two  
            entities.

          12)Provides that the additional fee shall be applied to an  
            original vehicle registration occurring on or after six months  
            following the adoption of the resolution by the MPO, COG, or a  
            county transportation commission and a subregional COG jointly  
            preparing an SCS, and to a renewal of registration with an  
            expiration date on or after that six-month period.

          13)Provides that all revenue received by the authorization of an  
            additional fee amount shall be used solely to develop a SCS or  
            a regional blueprint plan to identify land use strategies to  
            reduce the use of motor vehicles in its jurisdiction and carry  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  5


            out applicable transportation- related activities necessary to  
            implement the plan, and thereby achieve the greenhouse gas  
            emission reduction target as specified in Government Code  
            Section 65080, and to implement a SCS or regional blueprint  
            plan that achieves the greenhouse gas emission reduction  
            target.

          14)Provides that if the additional fee exceeds $1, all amounts  
            above $1 in a jurisdiction with a population greater than  
            300,000 shall be used to provide grants to cities, counties,  
            cities and counties, and congestion management agencies for  
            planning and projects related to the implementation of a  
            regional blueprint plan.  

          15)Provides that the entities shall transmit 5% of all revenue  
            received from the first $1 of the additional fee imposed to  
            the PAAC for the performance of the new duties of the PAAC, as  
            specified.

          16)Allows the MPO, the COG, or a county transportation  
            commission and a subregional COG jointly preparing a  
            subregional SCS, pursuant to an agreement with the local AQMD  
            that has responsibility over the jurisdiction, to divide  
            revenues received from the imposition of an additional fee  
            jointly with the local AQMD.

          17)Provides that all revenue received by the local AQMD shall be  
            used to assist local and regional governments in reducing  
            greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including, but not limited to,  
            all of the following:

             a)   Assistance in the development of a subregional SCS;

             b)   Assistance in the development of local GHG emissions  
               inventories;

             c)   Assistance in the development of GHG emission reduction  
               strategies in general plans;

             d)   Development and assistance of California Environmental  
               Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and review of GHG emissions  
               in CEQA analyses;

             e)   Consultation and development of local climate action  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  6


               plans; and,

             f)   Project specific consultation work to reduce GHG  
               emissions from local transportation and land use decisions.

          18)Adds, to several Health and Safety Code sections that allow  
            for the imposition of fees on motor vehicle registration,  
            language that specifies that if a local AQMD requests an  
            increase in the fee for the purpose of transferring the  
            additional revenue generated to an MPO, a COG, or a county  
            transportation commission and a subregional COG jointly  
            preparing an SCS, then that district shall not be subject to  
            the conditions of the fee authorization contained in that code  
            section.

          19)Provides that an SCS and an alternative planning strategy  
            (APS) shall both be considered to be a regional blueprint.

          20)Adds a new duty for SGC to consult with and coordinate its  
            recommendations with PAAC.

          21)Provides that the DMV, if requested by a local AQMD, shall  
            collect an additional fee of $1 or $2 and transmit that  
            additional fee revenue to the local AQMD quarterly, after  
            deducting its costs incurred in administering the addition fee  
            from that revenue.

          22)Requires the MPO, the COG, or the county transportation  
            commission and the subregional COG jointly preparing a  
            subregional SCS, to pay for the costs identified by DMV to  
            administer the additional fee; and requires those entities and  
            the local AQMD to contract with the DMV to pay for the initial  
            setup and programming costs identified by DMV.

          23)Requires the initial setup and programming costs of the DMV  
            to be reimbursed by the implementing entity from the  
            additional fee revenues collected.

          24)Specifies, for any agency that is not the first agency to  
            authorize the additional fee, that the DMV shall require an  
            additional amount to reflect each agency's per capita share of  
            the setup costs if the costs for the first agency are  
            substantially higher than those for subsequent agencies; and  
            specifies that the additional fee amounts must be paid to the  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  7


            first agency establishing the additional fee.

          25)Makes other findings and declarations, and expresses the  
            intent of the Legislature to update the duties and composition  
            of the PAAC to assist in the state's land use planning  
            processes by providing funding to support the development and  
            implementation for regional blueprints and related planning.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Provides for the creation of PAAC under OPR, and specifies  
            that the membership includes:

             a)    Three city representatives;

             b)    Three county representatives;

             c)   One representative of each district (provided that at  
               least two of the district representatives are  
               representatives of each metropolitan areawide planning  
               organizations and that at least one of the district  
               representatives is a representative of a nonmetropolitan  
               planning organization; and,

             d)   One representative of Indian tribes and bands which have  
               reservations or rancherias within California.

          2)Provides for the selection process of PAAC members, provides  
            for the length of term for PAAC members, specifies when and  
            how PAAC will meet, and specifies the compensation of PAAC  
            members.

          3)Specifies that PAAC shall provide advice, and in particular:

             a)   Assist in the preparation of the state long-range goals  
               and policies;

             b)   Evaluate the planning functions of the various state  
               agencies involved in planning; and,

             c)   Make appropriate decisions and provide such advice and  
               assistance as may be required by federal statute or  
               regulation in connection with any federal program  
               administered by OPR.








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  8



          4)Provides for the creation of SGC, and provides that SGC shall:

             a)   Identify and review activities and funding programs of  
               member state agencies that may be coordinated to improve  
               air and water quality, improve natural resource protection,  
               increase the availability of affordable housing, improve  
               transportation, meet the goals of the California Global  
               Warming Solutions Act of 2006, encourage sustainable land  
               use planning, and revitalize urban and community centers in  
               a sustainable manner;

             b)   Recommend policies and investment strategies and  
               priorities to the Governor, the Legislature, and to  
               appropriate state agencies to encourage the development of  
               sustainable communities;

             c)   Provide, fund, and distribute data and information to  
               local governments and regional agencies that will assist in  
               developing and planning sustainable communities;

             d)   Manage and award grants and loans to support the  
               planning and development of sustainable communities; and,

             e)   Develop guidelines for awarding financial assistance and  
               eligibility, and develop criteria for determining the  
               amount of financial assistance.

          5)Establishes a basic vehicle registration fee of $34, plus a  
            $22 surcharge for additional personnel for the California  
            Highway Patrol, and authorizes local agencies to impose  
            separate vehicle registration fee surcharges in their  
            respective jurisdictions for a variety of special programs,  
            including:  

             a)   $1 for service authorities for freeway emergencies;

             b)   $1 for deterring and prosecuting vehicle theft;

             c)   Up to $7 for air quality programs;

             d)   $1 for removing abandoned vehicles; and, 

             e)   $1 for fingerprint identification programs.  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  9



          6)Specifies that the DMV, if requested by the Sacramento  
            Metropolitan AQMD, shall impose and collect a surcharge on the  
            vehicle registration fees for every motor vehicle registered,  
            not to exceed $6, for air quality-related programs.

          7)Specifies that the DMV, if requested by the a county air  
            pollution control district, AQMD, or unified or regional air  
            pollution control district, shall collect fees upon the  
            registration or renewal of registration of any motor vehicle  
            in the district, and distribute the revenues collected, less  
            the DMV's fees, to the districts to be used for activities  
            related to the California Clean Air Act of 1988.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee:

          1)One time programming/startup costs to DMV of $150,000.  Minor  
            ongoing costs to administer the program.  One time costs  
            reimbursed from the local agency first approving the fee.   
            Subsequent agencies approving the fee would reimburse the  
            first agency for start up costs on a pro-rata basis.  Ongoing  
            costs by DMV and local air boards for levying and distributing  
            the fee would be deducted from fee proceeds.

          2)Fee revenues to local agencies of up to $63 million annually,  
            if all agencies approved a two dollar increase.  Of this  
            maximum amount, $1.5 million annually would be transferred to  
            PAAC to fund its expanded operations. 
           COMMENTS  :  Existing law establishes OPR within the Governor's  
          office as the state's comprehensive planning agency.  PAAC  
          within OPR is responsible for various land-use planning related  
          activities, including development of the State Environmental  
          Goals and Policies Report (EGPR).  The EGPR, a 20- to 30- year  
          look ahead at state growth and development, must be consistent  
          with the state's planning priorities.  The Director of OPR  
          appoints the membership of PAAC, which under current law must  
          include three city representatives, three county  
          representatives, one representative from each of the regional  
          planning districts designated by OPR, and one representative of  
          Indian tribes with reservations in California.  

          SB 375 (Steinberg), Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008, required each  
          MPO to include within its regional transportation plan an SCS  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  10


          designed to achieve specified targets for GHG emissions  
          reduction.  If SCS does not achieve the reduction target, the  
          MPO must prepare an alternative planning strategy (APS).  In  
          some regions, cities and counties have jointly formed councils  
          of government (COGs) to implement regional planning activities.   
          COGs generally serve as federally recognized MPOs for  
          transportation planning purposes, although some COGs, such as  
          the San Francisco Bay Area, have a separate MPO for  
          transportation planning.

          SB 732 (Steinberg), Chapter 729, Statutes of 2008, created the  
          SGC, consisting of the Director of OPR, the Secretary of the  
          Natural Resources Agency, the Secretary of the Environmental  
          Protection Agency, the Secretary of the Business, Transportation  
          and Housing Agency, the Secretary of the California Health and  
          Human Services Agency, and a public member.  The SGC is required  
          to recommend policies to the Governor, state agencies, and the  
          Legislature to encourage the development of sustainable  
          communities and provide local governments and regional agencies  
          with data to assist in planning sustainable communities.  The  
          SGC is charged with awarding and managing grants for the $90  
          million pot contained in Proposition 84 - "The Safe Drinking  
          Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and  
          Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006" that was specifically set  
          aside for "planning grants and incentives."  Additionally, the  
          SGC has the responsibility of commenting on OPR's EGPR and the  
          state's five-year infrastructure plan.  AB 1473 (Hertzberg),  
          Chapter 606, Statutes of 1999, required the Governor, beginning  
          in 2002, to submit annually a five-year proposed capital  
          improvement plan to the Legislature that includes proposed  
          capital improvement projects and their proposed funding sources.

          According to the sponsor, the California Association of Councils  
          of Governments (CALCOG), this bill "provides a permanent funding  
          source for the regional and local planning required to implement  
          SB 375, and also creates a council with local officials to  
          advise the Strategic Growth Council and thereby, coordinates  
          state investments with local and regional SB 375 implementation  
          strategies."  Further, "funding and coordination are necessary  
          to enable regional and local governments to successfully plan  
          for implementation [of SB 375], which not only addresses  
          greenhouse gas issues, but calls for a more efficient land use  
          pattern which will reduce traffic congestion, support affordable  
          housing, and make California's urban regions a more attractive  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  11


          location for economic development."

          This bill would authorize an MPO, a COG, or a county  
          transportation commission and a subregional COG jointly  
          preparing a subregional SCS, to authorize an additional fee  
          amount on a motor vehicle registered within its jurisdiction,  
          upon adoption of a resolution authorizing the surcharge.   
          Amendments taken in the Assembly Appropriations Committee would  
          allow the fee amount of $1 or $2 to be added to an existing fee  
          imposed by air districts and collected by the DMV for  
          air-quality related programs and Clean Air Act-related programs.  
           All revenues derived from the new fee authorized by an MPO, a  
          COG, or a county transportation commission and a subregional COG  
          jointly preparing a subregional SCS would be used solely to  
          develop and implement an SCS or a regional blueprint plan that  
          would help achieve greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.   
          The bill specifies that in jurisdictions with a population  
          exceeding 300,000 that impose the full $2 fee, half of the  
          revenues would be used to provide grants to cities, counties,  
                                                                                and congestion management agencies within the region for  
          planning and projects related to the implementation of a  
          regional blueprint plan, including an SCS or APS.  The MPO, COG,  
          or county transportation commission could also, by agreement,  
          divide revenues received from the surcharge with the local AQMD.  
           Revenues received by the air districts pursuant to a joint  
          agreement would be used to assist local and regional governments  
          in reducing GHG emissions.  Five percent of all revenues  
          collected, however, would be transferred to PAAC to perform the  
          new duties imposed by this bill. DMV would be tasked with  
          collecting the additional fee amount and remitting the revenues  
          to the air districts who would then distribute the fee to the  
          MPO, COG, or county transportation commission and subregional  
          COG jointly preparing a subregional SCS.

          Additionally, this bill adds new members to PAAC, and gives PAAC  
          the responsibility to work with SGC and other regional agencies  
          to facilitate the implementation of regional blueprint plans,  
          and requires PAAC to report back to the Legislature, in  
          consultation and coordination with SGC.

          A similar measure, AB 2870 (DeSaulnier) from the 2007-08  
          session, passed out of the Assembly Local Government Committee  
          but ultimately failed passed in the Senate Local Government  
          Committee.  That bill would have created the California  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  12


          Blueprint Implementation Council, which would have been charged  
          with the implementation of regional blueprint projects.   
          Previous versions of AB 2870 would have allowed for the  
          imposition of a surcharge on motor vehicle registration, in  
          order for the MPO or COG to fund the development and  
          implementation of a regional blueprint plan to identify land use  
          strategies to reduce motor vehicle use and GHG emissions. This  
          bill builds upon the provisions contained in various versions of  
          AB 2870, but instead, focuses on a mechanism with which to fund  
          the planning that is required under SB 375, and requires  
          coordination of various agencies on the implementation of SB  
          375.

          Unlike other states, California does not invest state general  
          fund monies to support local comprehensive planning.  Cities and  
          counties must rely on their own budgets, augmented by local  
          fees.  COGs rely on a mix of federal funds and members' dues.   
          This bill allows regional agencies to raise the revenues they  
          need by imposing an additional fee amount on an existing fee  
          related to air quality.  Californians already pay several  
          registration surcharges for freeway emergencies, abandoned cars,  
          vehicle theft programs, and some regional air quality efforts.  

          Opponents of the bill raise a variety of concerns about the  
          funding mechanism in the bill.  Some cities argue that, since SB  
          375 is a statewide requirement, the funding source should be  
          levied at the state level.  Other concerns are that it is  
          inappropriate to levy another registration fee surcharge during  
          the current economic downturn and that such fees should be  
          subject to voter approval.

          For clarification purposes, the Legislature may wish to add  
          cross-references in several sections of the bill that amend  
          existing Health and Safety Code provisions.  The  
          cross-references are needed to ensure that the new language in  
          those sections is tied to another section that this bill amends  
          - Government Code 65083 - which contains language specifying  
          that the MPO, COG, or a county transportation commission and a  
          subregional COG jointly preparing a SCS must adopt a resolution  
          authorizing the additional fee amount.



           Analysis Prepared by  :    Debbie Michel / L. GOV. / (916)  








                                                                  SB 406
                                                                  Page  13


          319-3958 

                                                               FN:  0002778