BILL ANALYSIS
------------------------------------------------------------
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE | SB 476|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses | |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524 | |
|(916) 651-1520 Fax: (916) | |
|327-4478 | |
------------------------------------------------------------
THIRD READING
Bill No: SB 476
Author: Correa (D)
Amended: 4/30/09
Vote: 21
SENATE ENV. QUALITY COMMITTEE : 6-0, 4/27/09
AYES: Simitian, Runner, Ashburn, Corbett, Hancock,
Lowenthal
NO VOTE RECORDED: Pavley
SUBJECT : California Environmental Quality Act: public
comment
SOURCE : California Building Properties Association
DIGEST : This bill clarifies provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act that prescribe when and how a
person may bring an action or a proceeding against a
project before a public entity.
ANALYSIS : Existing law, under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), prohibits an action from
being brought on alleged grounds of noncompliance with CEQA
unless the alleged grounds for noncompliance were presented
to the public agency orally or in writing by any person
during the public comment period or prior to the close of
the public hearing on the project before issuance of the
notice of determination (NOD). (Section 21177 of the
Public Resources Code)
CONTINUED
SB 476
Page
2
This bill provides that the time period prior to the close
of the public hearing on the project is before filing
(rather than issuance) of the NOD, and provides a reference
to requirements for state and local agencies to file the
NOD.
Comments
Since a person is prohibited from bringing an action on
alleged grounds of noncompliance with CEQA unless the
alleged grounds were presented during the public comment
period or prior to the close of the public hearing, this
bill clarifies that the closure point is when the public
hearing is prior to the NOD being filed, rather than the
NOD being issued. This bill provides further clarification
by providing a cross reference to the two provisions of
CEQA outlining requirements for state and local agencies to
file a NOD.
A lead agency must file a NOD after deciding to carry out
or approve a project. A state agency files the NOD with
the Office of Planning and Research (OPR). A local agency
files the NOD with the county clerk. If the project
requires discretionary approval from any state agency, the
local agency must also file the NOD with OPR.
NOTE: Please refer to the Senate Environmental Quality
Committee analysis for further background on CEQA.
FISCAL EFFECT : Appropriation: No Fiscal Com.: No
Local: No
SUPPORT : (Verified 4/30/09)
California Building Properties Association (source)
California Chamber of Commerce
TSM:mw 5/1/09 Senate Floor Analyses
SUPPORT/OPPOSITION: SEE ABOVE
**** END ****