BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                SB 505
                                                                       

                      SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
                        Senator S. Joseph Simitian, Chairman
                              2009-2010 Regular Session
                                           
           BILL NO:    SB 505
           AUTHOR:     Kehoe
           AMENDED:    April 21, 2009
           FISCAL:     Yes               HEARING DATE:     April 27, 2009
           URGENCY:    No                CONSULTANT:       Randy Pestor
            
           SUBJECT  :    FIRE HAZARD IMPACTS

            SUMMARY  :    
           
            Existing law  :

           1) Under Protection of Forest, Range and Forage Lands Law,  
              requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection  
              (SBFFP) to classify lands where the financial  
              responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires is  
              primarily a state responsibility (i.e., state  
              responsibility areas (SRAs)).  SRAs include lands covered  
              by trees producing or capable of producing forest products.  
               SRAs cannot include federal owned or controlled land, or  
              land within a city.

           2) Under Planning and Zoning Law, requires cities and counties  
              to adopt a general plan that includes seven mandated  
              elements (land use, circulation, housing, conservation,  
              open space, noise, safety), and requires cities and  
              counties to adopt zoning ordinances regulating, for  
              example, the use of buildings, structures, and land.   
              Authority is provided to local governments to regulate  
              subdivisions under the Subdivision Map Act.

           3) Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):

              a)    Requires lead agencies with the principal  
                 responsibility for carrying out or approving a proposed  
                 discretionary project to prepare a negative declaration,  
                 mitigated declaration, or environmental impact report  
                 (EIR) for this action, unless the project is exempt from  
                 CEQA (CEQA includes various statutory exemptions, as  









                                                                SB 505
                                                                 Page 2

                 well as categorical exemptions in the CEQA guidelines).   
                 An initial study is prepared to determine whether a  
                 project may have a significant effect on the  
                 environment.  The Office of Planning and Research (OPR)  
                 must prepare and develop proposed guidelines to  
                 implement CEQA, and submit them to the Secretary of the  
                 Resources Agency for certification and adoption.  OPR  
                 must review the guidelines at least every two years and  
                 recommend changes or amendments to the Secretary for  
                 certification and adoption.

              b)    Requires lead agencies to consult with responsible  
                 and trustee agencies, and requires a notice of  
                 preparation (NOP) to be submitted to responsible  
                 agencies and trustee agencies, so agencies can identify  
                 environmental information to be included in an EIR.  A  
                 notice of completion (NOC) is provided prior to  
                 certification of an EIR, adoption of a negative  
                 declaration, or making a determination that a project is  
                 within the scope of a master EIR.

            This bill  :

           1) Under Planning and Zoning Law:

              a)    Requires the general plan safety element to consider  
                 the advice of "Fire Hazard Planning" document prepared  
                 by OPR, and subsequent revisions.  OPR must update this  
                 document before January 1, 2011.

              b)    Requires the safety element to include certain  
                 matters (e.g., fire hazard information; goals, policies,  
                 and objectives based on this information for protecting  
                 the community from unreasonable fire risk; set of  
                 feasible implementation measures designed to carry out  
                 the goals, policies, and objectives).

              c)    Requires the safety element to also be submitted to  
                 Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF). 

           2) Under CEQA:











                                                                SB 505
                                                                 Page 3

              a)    Requires OPR, at the next CEQA guidelines update on  
                 or after January 1, 2010, to prepare guidelines  
                 recommending changes to the initial study checklist for  
                 the inclusion of questions related to fire hazard  
                 impacts for projects in an SRA or within very high  
                 hazard severity zones.  After receipt and review, the  
                 Natural Resources Agency must certify and adopt the  
                 guidelines.

              b)    Requires a lead agency to consult with CDF and the  
                 SBFFP for a project within a SRA or a very high hazard  
                 severity zone, which can be conducted in the same manner  
                 as for responsible agencies.  The lead agency must also  
                 send a NOP and a NOC to CDF and the SBFFP for certain  
                 projects within a SRA or a very high hazard severity  
                 zone.

            COMMENTS  :

            1) Purpose of Bill  .  According to the author, "In 2005, the  
              Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO) reported that there are  
              31 million acres in [SRAs] and that local land use  
              decisions are responsible for the increased density of  
              homes in the wildland-urban interface.  According to fire  
              experts, residential density and human activities in the  
              wildland-urban interface increase fire risk, with costs  
              borne at all levels of government.  According to an April  
              2009 Climate Action Team report, global warming is more  
              severe than scientists previously thought and the number of  
              wildfires are expected to double over the next several  
              decades."

           The author notes that "It is in the state's best interest to  
              ensure that cities and counties do all they can to engage  
              in comprehensive and consistent fire prevention and fire  
              protection planning as early in the local land use planning  
              process as possible.  Affording [CDF] the same opportunity  
              to comment under [CEQA] on large projects proposed for SRAs  
              or high fire hazard severity zones as other state agencies  
              will assist local jurisdictions in addressing planning  
              strategies for fire prevention and fire suppression."











                                                                SB 505
                                                                 Page 4

            2) Brief background on CEQA  .  CEQA provides a process for  
              evaluating the environmental effects of a project, and  
              includes statutory exemptions, as well as categorical  
              exemptions in the CEQA guidelines.  If a project is not  
              exempt from CEQA, an initial study is prepared to determine  
              whether a project may have a significant effect on the  
              environment.  If the initial study shows that there would  
              not be a significant effect on the environment, the lead  
              agency must prepare a negative declaration.  If the initial  
              study shows that the project may have a significant effect  
              on the environment, the lead agency must prepare an EIR.

           Generally, an EIR must accurately describe the proposed  
              project, identify and analyze each significant  
              environmental impact expected to result from the proposed  
              project, identify mitigation measures to reduce those  
              impacts to the extent feasible, and evaluate a range of  
              reasonable alternatives to the proposed project.  Prior to  
              approving any project that has received environmental  
              review, an agency must make certain findings.  If  
              mitigation measures are required or incorporated into a  
              project, the agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring  
              program to ensure compliance with those measures.

           If a mitigation measure would cause one or more significant  
              effects in addition to those that would be caused by the  
              proposed project, the effects of the mitigation measure  
              must be discussed but in less detail than the significant  
              effects of the proposed project.

            3) Responding to concerns  .  Following recent wildfires, there  
              are concerns over reducing loss of lives and property, high  
              costs of fire protection, and addressing those losses and  
              costs through land use planning and CEQA.  SB 505 expands  
              the required contents of safety elements covering SRA lands  
              and very high fire hazard severity zones; adds CDF to the  
              list of public agencies reviewing and reporting  
              recommendations to local governments regarding their draft  
              or existing safety elements; provides that when entities  
              must review draft or existing safety elements involving  
              SRAs and very high hazard severity zones, that the review  
              be within 60 days; requires OPR to revise the CEQA  










                                                                SB 505
                                                                 Page 5

              guidelines to change the initial study to address fire  
              hazard impacts; and provides CEQA notice and consultation  
              for CDF and SBFFP for certain projects in those areas.

           The CEQA notice and consultation requirements under SB 505 for  
              CDF and SBFFP are similar to notice and consultation  
              requirements for responsible and trustee agencies - except  
              that under SB 505, notice and consultation requirements  
              are:  a) only for projects in very limited areas (i.e.,  
              SRAs and very high fire hazard severity zones); and b) for  
              very limited types of projects (i.e., development  
              agreements, tentative and vesting tentative subdivision  
              maps, and projects of statewide, regional, or areawide  
              significance).

            4) Related legislation  .  SB 1500 (Kehoe) of 2008 prohibited  
              counties from approving projects in SRAs until the county  
              received certification from fire protection agencies that  
              there is or will be sufficient structural fire protection  
              for the project.  SB 1500 also required consultation and  
              notices under CEQA in a manner that is similar to SB 505,  
              except for all projects in those areas.  SB 1500 was placed  
              on the Assembly inactive file.  AB 2447 (Jones) of 2008,  
              which was vetoed, required counties to deny approval of a  
              tentative or parcel subdivision map in SRAs and very high  
              fire hazard severity zones, unless certain findings could  
              be made.  AB 666 (Jones) addressed similar issues and was  
              approved by the Assembly Local Government Committee April  
              22, 2009 (5-2).

           SB 505 differs from last year's bills by not directly  
              affecting local government authority over land use  
              decisions in SRAs very high fire hazard severity zones, and  
              instead revises planning requirements while providing for  
              notice and early consultation under CEQA.

            SOURCE  :        Senator Kehoe  

           SUPPORT  :       California Fire Chiefs Association
           California Fire Districts Association of California
           California Professional Firefighters
           Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority










                                                                SB 505
                                                                 Page 6

           Orange County Professional Firefighters Association IAFF Local  
                          3631
           Sierra Club California  

           OPPOSITION  :    American Council of Engineering Companies,  
                          California
           California Building Industry Association
           California Business Properties Association
           CalChamber
           California Forestry Association
           California Major Builders Council
           California State Association of Counties
           Regional Council of Rural Counties
           Resource Landowners Coalition