BILL ANALYSIS
Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair
565 (Pavley)
Hearing Date: 05/28/2009 Amended: 05/04/2009
As proposed to be amended
Consultant: Brendan McCarthy Policy Vote: EQ 5-2
_________________________________________________________________
____
BILL SUMMARY: SB 565 requires the State Water Board to develop
and implement a plan to ensure that 50 percent of the wastewater
currently discharged into the ocean is recycled. The bill
requires the State Water Board to impose fee on discharges of
wastewater into the ocean to pay for the costs of developing and
implementing the plan.
_________________________________________________________________
____
Fiscal Impact (in thousands)
Major Provisions 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Fund
Plan development Fully offset by fees Special
*
* Ocean Discharge Recycling Fund (new fund).
_________________________________________________________________
____
STAFF COMMENTS: Suspense file. As proposed to be amended.
SB 565 requires the State Water Board, in collaboration with
other state agencies and outside stakeholders, to develop a plan
to ensure that 50 percent of the wastewater currently discharged
into the ocean is recycled by 2030. The plan would identify any
regulatory, financial, engineering, or other impediment to
achieving the recycling goal. The plan would also include
specific actions to remove those impediments. The State Water
Board estimates the costs to develop the plan would be about $6
million over three years. While the bill requires that fees be
assessed to cover the costs of developing the plan, there may be
a gap between expenditures and the collection of fee revenues,
depending on how long it takes to adopt regulations to impose
the fee. The bill requires the State Water Board to adopt
measures to implement the plan. It is not clear what the scope
of implementation activities would be under the bill.
The bill requires the State Water Board to impose an annual fee
on discharges of wastewater into the ocean in an amount
sufficient to pay for the costs to develop the plan and adopt
any measures implementing the plan.
In June 2003, a legislatively mandated taskforce on recycled
water estimated that it would cost about $400 million per year
to recycle about 1.5 million acre-feet of wastewater. The task
force indicated that it would require about $300 million in
financial assistance to achieve this level of recycling. It is
not clear whether wastewater dischargers would be able to
support fees sufficient to generate this level of revenue.
As proposed to be amended by author, the bill would only require
the development of a plan. The amendments also specify that the
fee would also apply to dischargers into the San Francisco Bay
and other inland waters, but would not apply to dischargers with
a capacity less than 10 million gallons per day.