BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 571
                                                                  Page  1

          Date of Hearing:  June 22, 2009

                       ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES
                                Nancy Skinner, Chair
                SB 571 (Maldonado) - As Introduced:  February 27, 2009

           SENATE VOTE  :  35-0
           
          SUBJECT  :  Geothermal resources

           SUMMARY  :  Authorizes the State Oil and Gas Supervisor  
          (Supervisor) to deny proposed geothermal well operations until  
          an operator complies with an order, pays a civil penalty, or  
          remedies a violation.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Establishes the Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources  
            within the Department of Conservation (Department).  

          2)Requires the Supervisor to oversee the drilling, operation,  
            maintenance and abandonment of oil, gas, and geothermal wells.  
             An owner or operator of any well is required to obtain  
            approval from the Supervisor prior to commencing the drilling  
            of a well.

          3)Authorizes the Supervisor to deny proposed oil and gas well  
            drilling operations if an operator fails to comply with an  
            order, pay a civil penalty or other fee, or remedy a  
            violation.

          4)Authorizes the Supervisor to order a well to be inspected,  
            abandoned or redrilled if the well is determined to be  
            hazardous or idle-deserted.

          5)Imposes a civil penalty of $5,000 on any person who violates  
            policies or regulations governing the management of geothermal  
            resources 

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Senate Appropriations  
          Committee, pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8, negligible state costs.

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, the Supervisor "?does not  
          have authority to deny approval of geothermal well operations  
          proposed by an operator who has failed to comply with an order,  








                                                                  SB 571
                                                                  Page  2

          pay civil penalties or well fees, or remedy other violations.   
          Thus, an out-of-compliance operator may expand operations, and,  
          therefore, increase opportunities for noncompliance while  
          continuing to ignore their legal obligations associated with  
          current operations."

           1)Background:   California is the largest generator of  
            electricity from geothermal resources.  In 2006, nearly five  
            percent of the state's electricity was generated from  
            geothermal resources.  This percentage is expected to increase  
            given generation requirements pursuant to the renewable  
            portfolio standard.  Between 2006 and 2008, the number of well  
            permits issued by the Department increased 221 percent.   
            Currently, there are more than 600 active, high-temperature  
            geothermal wells and 230 injection wells operating in the  
            state.

            While the Department has not witnessed a significant increase  
            in noncompliant operators, it views this bill as a proactive  
            measure given the large increase in drilling operations and  
            the high cost to remediate and restore a well (approximately  
            $250,000).  The author believes that this bill is necessary so  
            that the state is not forced to assume responsibility to  
            remediate wells from irresponsible operators.

           2)Related legislation  : This bill is conceptually similar to AB  
            291 (Salda?a), which this committee approved on April 13,  
            2009.  AB 291 prohibits the California Coastal Commission from  
            acting on a coastal development permit application for  
            development on any property subject to a violation of the  
            Coastal Act.

           3)Proposed amendments  : The author has proposed the following  
            technical amendments:

          Page 2, lines 3-6 should be amended to read:  

          (a) When an operator fails to comply with an order of the  
          supervisor issued pursuant to  Section 3255   this chapter  , the  
          supervisor may deny approval of proposed well operations until  
          the operator brings existing well operations into compliance  
          with the order. 

          Page 2, lines 7-14 should be amended to read: 









                                                                  SB 571
                                                                  Page  3

          (b) When an operator fails to pay a civil penalty imposed  
          pursuant to Section 3754.5, comply with an order issued  under  
          Section 3753   pursuant to this chapter  to remedy or repair a  
          condition found to be in violation of the chapter, or pay a  
          charge assessed under Section 3724.5, the supervisor may deny  
          approval of the operator's proposed well operations until the  
          operator pays the civil penalty, remedies the violation to the  
          satisfaction of the supervisor, or pays the charge assessed  
          under Section 3724.5.

           REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION  :

           Support 
           
          None on file
           
            Opposition 
           
          None on file


           Analysis Prepared by  :  Dan Chia / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092