BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    




                   Senate Appropriations Committee Fiscal Summary
                           Senator Christine Kehoe, Chair

                                           585 (Leno)
          
          Hearing Date:  05/28/2009           Amended: As introduced
          Consultant:  Jacqueline Wong-HernandezPolicy Vote: Public Safety  
          4-2
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
          BILL SUMMARY:   SB 585 would prohibit an officer, employee,  
          operator, or any lessee of the state agency 1-A District  
          Agricultural Association, also known as the Cow Palace, from  
          contracting for, authorizing, or allowing the sale of any  
          firearm or ammunition on the property or in the buildings of the  
          Cow Palace property in San Mateo County and the City and County  
          of San Francisco or any successor or additional property owned, 
          leased, or otherwise occupied or operated by the district. A  
          violation of this provision would be a misdemeanor.
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____
                            Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions         2009-10      2010-11       2011-12     Fund
           
          Gun show revenue loss               $0            $0              
             $0              Special*

          *A-1 District Agricultural Association Operating Fund   
          _________________________________________________________________ 
          ____

          STAFF COMMENTS: SUSPENSE FILE. AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED

          This bill intends to ban gun shows from being held at the Cow  
          Palace, which is a state-owned facility. Representatives of the  
          Cow Palace report that in 2008, the facility was used for 5 gun  
          shows, and that they anticipate holding 5 gun shows per year for  
          at least the next three years. Gun show revenues are generated  
          by rental fees, parking, and food concessions, and vary based  
          upon attendance. Actual revenues from the 5 gun shows in 2008  
          totaled approximately $170,000. 

          If gun shows were banned, the facility could still be rented for  
          other purposes, but representatives of the Cow Palace indicate  
          that there is no guarantee that the dates could be re-rented.  










          They note that dates in 2009 are still available for facility  
          use, even while accommodating the 5 planned gun shows.

          The Cow Palace is largely responsible for generating its own  
          operating revenue, and in 2009 the projected revenue is  
          approximately $4,000,000. The state Fairs and Expositions  
          special fund currently allocates $175,000 to the Cow Palace  
          annually. This allocation, however, will instead be made from  
          the General Fund beginning in 2009-10. The loss of revenue would  
          directly impact the operations of the Cow Palace.

          AS PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED: This bill would phase out gun shows  
          over the next few years by implementing the following  
          regulations:
             A)   Prohibit any increase in the number of gun shows than  
               currently take place at the Cow Palace each year.

            Page 2
            SB 585 (Leno)

             B)   Require the Cow Palace to decrease the total number of  
               gun shows each year when a show date can be replaced by a  
               non gun-related event.
             C)   Prohibit the Cow Palace from adding additional gun shows  
               once they have been eliminated.

          The Cow Palace currently has 5 gun shows booked annually in  
          2009, 2010, and 2011. This amendment would not result in a  
          direct revenue loss during those years, but could result in the  
          loss of future potential revenue to the extent that it could  
          have accommodated both the gun and other shows instead of  
          replacing the gun shows with non gun-related shows.