BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 598|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 598
          Author:   Huff (R), et al
          Amended:  5/5/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/28/09
          AYES:  Leno, Benoit, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  
            Wright

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  12-0, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, DeSaulnier, Hancock,  
            Leno, Oropeza, Runner, Walters, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk


           SUBJECT  :    Vehicles:  driving under the influence

           SOURCE  :     Distilled Spirits Council of the United States


           DIGEST  :    This bill amends existing driving-under the  
          influence laws relative to the procedures to be followed  
          for the issuance of a restricted drivers license.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires a person's privilege to  
          operate a motor vehicle to be suspended or revoked for a  
          specified period of time if the person has been convicted  
          of violating specified provisions prohibiting driving a  
          motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic  
          beverage or drug, or the combined influence of an alcoholic  
          beverage and drug, or with 0.08 percent or more, by weight,  
          of alcohol in his/her blood, or who is addicted to the use  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          2

          of any drug.  Existing law authorizes a person whose  
          privilege is suspended or revoked in that manner to receive  
          a restricted driver's license if specified requirements are  
          met, including, in some instances, the installation of a  
          certified ignition interlock device on the person's  
          vehicle.

          Existing law requires that a person, convicted of driving  
          under the influence, without bodily injury to another,  
          within 10 years of being convicted of a separate violation  
          of one of specified driving-under-the-influence offenses,  
          be punished by his/her driving privilege being suspended  
          for two years.  The Department of Motor Vehicles is  
          required to advise the person that he/she may apply for a  
          restricted driver's license after completion of 12 months  
          of the suspension period, which may include credit for a  
          specified concurrent suspension, subject to certain  
          conditions, including, among other things, submitting proof  
          of installation of a certified ignition interlock device,  
          agreeing to maintain the ignition interlock device, and  
          paying certain fees, including, but not limited to, all  
          administrative fees or reissue fees.

          This bill requires the department to advise the person that  
          he/she may apply for a restricted driver's license after  
          completion of 90 days or 12 months of the suspension  
          period, if the circumstances of the offense involve having  
          0.08 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in the blood.

          Existing law requires that a person convicted of driving  
          under the influence, without bodily injury to another,  
          within 10 years of being convicted of two separate  
          violations of specified driving-under-the-influence  
          offenses, be punished by his/her driving privilege being  
          revoked for three years.  The department is required to  
          advise the person that he/she may apply for a restricted  
          driver's license after completion of 12 months of the  
          revocation period, which may include credit for a specified  
          concurrent suspension, subject to certain conditions,  
          including, among other things, satisfactory completion of  
          12 months of an 18-month or 30-month  
          driving-under-the-influence program, submitting proof of  
          installation of a certified ignition interlock device,  
          agreeing to maintain the ignition interlock device, and  







                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          3

          paying certain fees.

          This bill instead requires the department to advise the  
          person of his/her ability to apply for a restricted  
          driver's license after completion of six months or 12  
          months of the revocation period if the circumstances of the  
          offense involve having 0.08 person or more, by weight, of  
          alcohol in the blood, and subject to certain conditions,  
          including that if the person is convicted of a specified  
          offense that person subsequently satisfactorily completes  
          six months or 12 months of an 18-month or 30-month  
          driving-under-the-influence program, as prescribed.  The  
          bill requires the person to pay a fee sufficient to cover  
          the costs of administration, as determined by the  
          department.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                     2009-10     2010-11     
           2011-12          Fund  

          DMV implementation costs      $267                 Special*

          DMV ongoing costs             $173**$172**     Special*

          *Motor Vehicle Account
          **Staff notes that ongoing costs are fully offset by fees

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/28/09)

          Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (source)
          The Century Council

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The Distilled Spirits Council of  
          the United States writes that, "Hardcore drunk drivers  
          account for the majority of alcohol-involved traffic  
          fatalities.  Crash data shows that drivers with a BAC of  
          .15 or above are 380 times more likely to be involved in a  
          fatal crash than the average non-drinking driver.   







                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          4

          According to the National Highway Traffic Safety  
          Administration, in 2007, drivers with a BAC of .15 or above  
          accounted for approximately 54 percent of the  
          alcohol-involved fatal crashes in California.

          Studies have revealed that many offenders who are required  
          to install an interlock simply do not do so.  In fact, only  
          abut 20% of the offenders ordered to install interlocks in  
          the United States have actually complied with this order.   
          This scenario occurs due to inadequate compliance  
          monitoring and poorly administered interlock programs.  All  
          too often interlocks are not integrated into a  
          comprehensive set of sanctions aimed at rehabilitating a  
          DUI offender.  Research shows that interlocks are an  
          effective deterrent while the device is on an offender's  
          car, but unless the interlock device is used in tandem with  
          other solutions, such as assessment and treatment, it is  
          unlikely to result in long-term behavior change."


          RJG:do  5/29/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****