BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                  SB 598
                                                                  Page  1


          SENATE THIRD READING
          SB 598 (Huff)
          As Amended  August 31, 2009
          Majority vote 

           SENATE VOTE  :39-0  
           
           PUBLIC SAFETY       7-0         TRANSPORTATION      12-0        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|Arambula, Hagman,         |Ayes:|Eng, Jeffries, Buchanan,  |
          |     |Ammiano, Furutani,        |     |Conway, Galgiani,         |
          |     |Gilmore, Hill, Ma         |     |Garrick, Bonnie           |
          |     |                          |     |Lowenthal, Miller,        |
          |     |                          |     |Niello, John A. Perez,    |
          |     |                          |     |Solorio, Torlakson        |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           APPROPRIATIONS      17-0                                        
           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
          |Ayes:|De Leon, Conway, Ammiano, |     |                          |
          |     |                          |     |                          |
          |     |Charles Calderon, Coto,   |     |                          |
          |     |Davis,                    |     |                          |
          |     |Fuentes, Hall, Harkey,    |     |                          |
          |     |Miller,                   |     |                          |
          |     |Nielsen, John A. Perez,   |     |                          |
          |     |Skinner,                  |     |                          |
          |     |Solorio, Audra            |     |                          |
          |     |Strickland, Torlakson,    |     |                          |
          |     |Hill                      |     |                          |
          |-----+--------------------------+-----+--------------------------|
          |     |                          |     |                          |
           ----------------------------------------------------------------- 
           SUMMARY  :  Provides that the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)  
          shall advise a person convicted of a second or third offense of  
          driving under the influence (DUI) with a blood alcohol content  
          (BAC) of .08% or more that he or she may receive a restricted  
          license, as specified, if he or she shows verification of  
          installation of a certified ignition interlock device (IID) and  
          pays a fee sufficient to include the costs of administration, as  
          specified.  Specifically,  this bill  :   








                                                                  SB 598
                                                                  Page  2


          1)States for a second offense DUI, the DMV shall notify the person  
            that he or she may apply for a restricted license, as specified,  
            after 90 days of suspension if he or she meets the requirements  
            of existing law and submits proof of a certified IID.  For a  
            third offense, a person may receive a restricted license after  
            six months of suspension if he or she meets the requirements of  
            existing law and submits proof of a certified IID.  

          2)States if the driver convicted of DUI installs and maintains an  
            IID and otherwise complies with existing law including  
            enrollment and participation in DUI classes required by DMV, the  
            only restriction on his or her license shall be the requirement  
            to only drive a vehicle with an installed IID, as specified.

          3)Specifies that the IID provisions of this bill shall apply only  
            to a person convicted of an alcohol-related DUI, as specified,  
            and not a person convicted of a controlled substances DUI. 

          4)States that a person need only enroll in a DUI program and show  
            proof of an IID to receive a restricted license rather than  
            complete a DUI program. 

          5)Makes other non-substantive, cross-referencing amendments to  
            conform provisions of this bill to existing law.

          6)States the provisions of this bill shall become operative on  
            July 1, 2010.

           EXISTING LAW  :

          1)Authorizes the court to require that a person convicted of a  
            first offense violation of DUI and DUI causing bodily injury to  
            install a certified IID on any vehicle that the person owns or  
            operates and prohibits that person from operating a motor  
            vehicle unless that vehicle is equipped with a functioning,  
            certified IID.  The court shall give heightened consideration to  
            applying this sanction to a first-offense violator with 0.20% or  
            more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood at arrest, or  
            with two or more prior moving traffic violations, or to persons  
            who refused the chemical tests at arrest.  If the court orders  
            the IID restriction, the term shall be determined by the court  
            for a period not to exceed three years from the date of  
            conviction.  The court shall notify the DMV, as specified, of  
            the terms of the restrictions in accordance with existing law.   
            The DMV shall place the restriction in the person's records in  







                                                                  SB 598
                                                                  Page  3


            the DMV.  

          2)Requires the court where a person convicted of a violation of  
            driving on a suspended license where the suspension is the  
            result of DUI to install an IID on any vehicle that the person  
            owns or operates and prohibits the person from operating a motor  
            vehicle unless the vehicle is equipped with a functioning,  
            certified IID.  The term of the restriction shall be determined  
            by the court for a period not to exceed three years from the  
            date of conviction.  

          3)States the court shall advise the person that installation of an  
            IID on a vehicle does not allow the person to drive without a  
            valid driver's license.  

          4)States a person whose driving privilege is restricted by the  
            court pursuant to this section shall arrange for each vehicle  
            with an IID to be serviced by the installer at least once every  
            60 days in order for the installer to recalibrate and monitor  
            the operation of the device.  The installer shall notify the  
            court if the device is removed or indicates that the person has  
            attempted to remove, bypass, or tamper with the device, or if  
            the person fails three or more times to comply with any  
            requirement for the maintenance or calibration of the IID.   
            There is no obligation for the installer to notify the court if  
            the person has complied with all of the requirements of this  
            article.  

           FISCAL EFFECT  :  According to the Assembly Appropriations  
          Committee, 1) one-time startup costs (Motor Vehicle Account) in  
          the range of $250,000 in 2009-10 for DMV to provide notices to DUI  
          offenders, modify its driver license suspension and revocation  
          process, and monitor installation and maintenance of IIDs.  These  
          costs should eventually be recouped via fees paid to DMV by DUI  
          violators who install IIDs; and 2) annual costs in the range of  
          $200,000 that should also be covered by DUI offenders who install  
          IIDs. 

           COMMENTS  :  According to the author, "Only a small percentage of  
          people convicted of multiple DUIs are required by court to install  
          an IID on their vehicles to discourage recidivism. Senate Bill 598  
          will increase the use of ignition interlocks among repeat  
          offenders while they are in treatment and will reduce the  
          incidence of driving while on a suspended license. The measure  
          provides one more tool to proactively fight drunk driving."







                                                                  SB 598
                                                                  Page  4



          Please see the policy committee for a full discussion of this  
          bill.
           

          Analysis Prepared by  :    Kimberly Horiuchi / PUB. S. / (916)  
          319-3744 

                                                                  FN: 0002610