BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 598|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                              UNFINISHED BUSINESS


          Bill No:  SB 598
          Author:   Huff (R), et al
          Amended:  9/4/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/28/09
          AYES:  Leno, Benoit, Cedillo, Hancock, Huff, Steinberg,  
            Wright

           SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  12-0, 5/28/09
          AYES:  Kehoe, Cox, Corbett, Denham, DeSaulnier, Hancock,  
            Leno, Oropeza, Runner, Walters, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Wolk

           SENATE FLOOR  :  39-0, 6/3/09
          AYES:  Aanestad, Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Calderon,  
            Cedillo, Cogdill, Corbett, Correa, Cox, Denham,  
            DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Dutton, Florez, Hancock, Harman,  
            Hollingsworth, Huff, Kehoe, Leno, Liu, Lowenthal,  
            Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Oropeza, Padilla, Pavley,  
            Romero, Runner, Simitian, Steinberg, Strickland, Walters,  
            Wiggins, Wolk, Wright, Wyland, Yee
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Vacancy

           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  :  78-0, 9/8/09 - See last page for vote


           SUBJECT  :    Vehicles:  driving under the influence

           SOURCE  :     Distilled Spirits Council of the United States


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          2

           DIGEST  :    This bill amends existing driving-under the  
          influence laws relative to the procedures to be followed  
          for the issuance of a restricted drivers license.

           Assembly Amendments  (1) add co-authors; (2) delete the 12  
          month wait to apply for a restricted drivers license; and  
          (3) require revocation of a drivers license for similar  
          convictions with in a ten year period of time.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing law requires a person's privilege to  
          operate a motor vehicle to be suspended or revoked for a  
          specified period of time if the person has been convicted  
          of violating specified provisions prohibiting driving a  
          motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic  
          beverage or drug, or the combined influence of an alcoholic  
          beverage and drug, or with 0.08 percent or more, by weight,  
          of alcohol in his or her blood, or who is addicted to the  
          use of any drug.  Existing law authorizes a person whose  
          privilege is suspended or revoked in that manner to receive  
          a restricted driver's license if specified requirements are  
          met, including, in some instances, the installation of a  
          certified ignition interlock device on the person's  
          vehicle.

          Existing law requires that a person, convicted of driving  
          under the influence, without bodily injury to another,  
          within 10 years of being convicted of a separate violation  
          of one of specified driving-under-the-influence offenses,  
          be punished by his or her driving privilege being suspended  
          for two years.  The Department of Motor Vehicles is  
          required to advise the person that he/she may apply for a  
          restricted driver's license after completion of 12 months  
          of the suspension period, which may include credit for a  
          specified concurrent suspension, subject to certain  
          conditions, including, among other things, submitting proof  
          of installation of a certified ignition interlock device,  
          agreeing to maintain the ignition interlock device, and  
          paying certain fees, including, but not limited to, all  
          administrative fees or reissue fees.

          This bill instead requires the department to advise a  
          person, who was only under the influence of an alcoholic  
          beverage at the time of the violation, that he/she may  
          apply for a restricted driver's license after completion of  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          3

          90 days of the suspension period, under certain  
          circumstances.

          Existing law requires that a person convicted of driving  
          under the influence, without bodily injury to another,  
          within 10 years of being convicted of two separate  
          violations of specified driving-under-the-influence  
          offenses, be punished by his/her driving privilege being  
          revoked for three years.  The department is required to  
          advise the person that he or she may apply for a restricted  
          driver's license after completion of 12 months of the  
          revocation period, which may include credit for a specified  
          concurrent suspension, subject to certain conditions,  
          including, among other things, satisfactory completion of  
          12 months of an 18-month or 30-month  
          driving-under-the-influence program, submitting proof of  
          installation of a certified ignition interlock device,  
          agreeing to maintain the ignition interlock device, and  
          paying certain fees.

          This bill instead requires the department to advise a  
          person, who was found to be only under the influence of an  
          alcoholic beverage at the time of the violation, of his or  
          her ability to apply for a restricted driver's license  
          after completion of 6 months of the revocation period,  
          subject to certain conditions, including that if the person  
          is convicted of a specified offense that person  
          subsequently satisfactorily provides proof of enrollment in  
          an 18-month or 30-month driving-under-the-influence  
          program, as prescribed.  The bill requires the person to  
          pay a fee sufficient to cover the costs of administration,  
          as determined by the department.

          This bill requires that a person convicted of driving under  
          the influence of any drug or the combined influence of any  
          drug and an alcoholic beverage, without bodily injury to  
          another, within 10 years of being convicted of a separate  
          violation of one of the specified  
          driving-under-the-influence offenses, be punished by his or  
          her driving privilege being revoked for two years.  This  
          bill authorizes the department to reinstate the privilege  
          provided certain conditions are met.  This bill requires  
          the department to advise the person that he/she may apply  
          for a restricted driver's license after completion of 12  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          4

          months of the suspended period, subject to certain  
          conditions including, among other things, that the person  
          provides proof of enrollment in an 18-month or 30-month  
          driving-under-the-influence program, as prescribed.

          This bill requires a person convicted of driving under the  
          influence of any drug or the combined influence of any drug  
          and an alcoholic beverage, without bodily injury to  
          another, within 10 years of being convicted of 2 separate  
          violations of specified driving-under-the-influence  
          offenses, be punished by his/her driving privilege being  
          revoked for three years.  This bill authorizes the  
          department to reinstate the privilege provided certain  
          conditions are met.  This bill requires the department to  
          advise the person that he or she may apply for a restricted  
          driver's license after completion of 12 months of the  
          suspended period, subject to certain conditions, including,  
          among other things, that the person has satisfactorily  
          completed the initial 12 months of an 18-month or 30-month  
          driving-under-the-influence program as prescribed. 

          This bill makes other conforming changes.

          This bill becomes operative on July 1, 2010.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

          According to the Senate Appropriations Committee:

                          Fiscal Impact (in thousands)

           Major Provisions                     2009-10     2010-11     
           2011-12          Fund  

          DMV implementation costs      $267                 Special*

          DMV ongoing costs             $173**$172**     Special*

          *Motor Vehicle Account
          **Staff notes that ongoing costs are fully offset by fees

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  9/9/09)


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          5

          Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (source)
          The Century Council

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    The Distilled Spirits Council of  
          the United States writes that, "Hardcore drunk drivers  
          account for the majority of alcohol-involved traffic  
          fatalities.  Crash data shows that drivers with a BAC of  
          .15 or above are 380 times more likely to be involved in a  
          fatal crash than the average non-drinking driver.   
          According to the National Highway Traffic Safety  
          Administration, in 2007, drivers with a BAC of .15 or above  
          accounted for approximately 54 percent of the  
          alcohol-involved fatal crashes in California.

          Studies have revealed that many offenders who are required  
          to install an interlock simply do not do so.  In fact, only  
          abut 20% of the offenders ordered to install interlocks in  
          the United States have actually complied with this order.   
          This scenario occurs due to inadequate compliance  
          monitoring and poorly administered interlock programs.  All  
          too often interlocks are not integrated into a  
          comprehensive set of sanctions aimed at rehabilitating a  
          DUI offender.  Research shows that interlocks are an  
          effective deterrent while the device is on an offender's  
          car, but unless the interlock device is used in tandem with  
          other solutions, such as assessment and treatment, it is  
          unlikely to result in long-term behavior change."


           ASSEMBLY FLOOR  : 
          AYES:  Adams, Ammiano, Anderson, Arambula, Beall, Bill  
            Berryhill, Tom Berryhill, Blakeslee, Block, Blumenfield,  
            Brownley, Buchanan, Caballero, Charles Calderon, Carter,  
            Chesbro, Conway, Cook, Coto, Davis, De La Torre, De Leon,  
            DeVore, Duvall, Emmerson, Eng, Evans, Feuer, Fletcher,  
            Fong, Fuller, Furutani, Gaines, Galgiani, Garrick,  
            Gilmore, Hagman, Hall, Harkey, Hayashi, Hernandez, Hill,  
            Huber, Huffman, Jeffries, Jones, Knight, Krekorian, Lieu,  
            Logue, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Miller, Monning,  
            Nava, Nestande, Niello, Nielsen, John A. Perez, V. Manuel  
            Perez, Portantino, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Silva,  
            Skinner, Smyth, Solorio, Audra Strickland, Swanson,  
            Torlakson, Torres, Torrico, Tran, Villines, Yamada, Bass
          NO VOTE RECORDED:  Fuentes, Vacancy

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 598
                                                                Page  
          6



          RJG:do  9/9/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****






































                                                           CONTINUED