BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 605|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 605
          Author:   Ashburn (R)
          Amended:  5/4/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE ENV. QUALITY COMMITTEE  :  7-0, 4/27/09
          AYES:  Simitian, Runner, Ashburn, Corbett, Hancock,  
            Lowenthal, Pavley
           
          SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE  :  Senate Rule 28.8


           SUBJECT  :    California Environmental Quality Act:  biogas  
          pipelines: 
                      exemption

           SOURCE  :     Kern County Board of Supervisors


           DIGEST  :    This bill provides for a biogas pipeline in  
          Fresno, Kern, Kings, or Tulare County to be added to the  
          exemption currently allowed for natural gas pipelines under  
          the California Environmental Quality Act.

           ANALYSIS :    Existing law, under the California  
          Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):

          1. Requires lead agencies with the principal responsibility  
             for carrying out or approving a proposed project to  
             prepare a negative declaration, mitigated declaration,  
             or environmental impact report (EIR) for this action,  
             unless the project is exempt from CEQA (CEQA includes  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 605
                                                                Page  
          2

             various statutory exemptions, as well as categorical  
             exemptions in the CEQA guidelines).  (Section 21080 et  
             seq. of the Public Resources Code) 

          2. Exempts a project of less than one mile in length within  
             a public street or highway, or another public  
             right-of-way for the installation of a new pipeline or  
             the maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning,  
             relocation, replacement, removal, or demolition of an  
             existing pipeline.  (Section 21080.21)

          3. Exempts the inspection, repair, restoration,  
             reconditioning, relocation, replacement, or removal of  
             an existing pipeline less than eight miles in length, or  
             any valve, flange, meter, or other equipment directly  
             attached to the pipeline if certain conditions are met  
             (e.g., "pipeline" is covered under the Elder California  
             Pipeline Safety Act of 1981, project is not less than  
             eight miles from any section of pipeline that has been  
             subject to this exemption in the past 12 months, certain  
             notice is provided, project is located within an  
             existing right-of-way and restored to its condition  
             prior to the project, notice requirements).  (Section  
             21080.23)

          This bill:

          1. Provides that for purposes of the Section 21080.23  
             pipeline exemption, "pipeline" also means a pipeline  
             located in Fresno, Kern, Kings, or Tulare County used to  
             transport biogas, meeting the requirements of that  
             section and all local, state, and federal laws.

          2. Defines "biogas" as a natural gas meeting certain  
             requirements and derived from anaerobic digestion of  
             dairy animal waste.

          3. Sunsets January 1, 2013.

          4. Provides legislative intent regarding the need for  
             special legislation.

           Comments
           







                                                                SB 605
                                                                Page  
          3

          According to the author, "Collection of Biogas produced at  
          dairy operations is an emerging method that can reduce  
          dairy emissions of methane, one of the leading contributors  
          to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ? the resulting usable  
          gas can be transported via pipelines to commercial natural  
          gas transmission lines where it is inserted into existing  
          natural gas supplies."  Although there are CEQA exemptions  
          for certain pipelines, the author notes that "biogas was  
          not being transported when the exemptions were put into the  
          code."

           Background  

          CEQA provides a process for evaluating the environmental  
          effects of a project, and includes statutory exemptions, as  
          well as categorical exemptions in the CEQA guidelines.  If  
          a project is not exempt from CEQA, an initial study is  
          prepared to determine whether a project may have a  
          significant effect on the environment.  If the initial  
          study shows that there would not be a significant effect on  
          the environment, the lead agency must prepare a negative  
          declaration.  If the initial study shows that the project  
          may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead  
          agency must prepare an EIR.

          Generally, an EIR must accurately describe the proposed  
          project, identify and analyze each significant  
          environmental impact expected to result from the proposed  
          project, identify mitigation measures to reduce those  
          impacts to the extent feasible, and evaluate a range of  
          reasonable alternatives to the proposed project.  Prior to  
          approving any project that has received environmental  
          review, an agency must make certain findings.  If  
          mitigation measures are required or incorporated into a  
          project, the agency must adopt a reporting or monitoring  
          program to ensure compliance with those measures.

          If a mitigation measure would cause one or more significant  
          effects in addition to those that would be caused by the  
          proposed project, the effects of the mitigation measure  
          must be discussed but in less detail than the significant  
          effects of the proposed project.

           CEQA pipeline exemptions  .  As noted above, current law  







                                                                SB 605
                                                                Page  
          4

          exempts installation of a new pipeline of less than one  
          mile under certain circumstances (Section 21080.21).  The  
          inspection, maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditions,  
          relocation, replacement, or removal of an existing pipeline  
          less than eight miles is also exempt from CEQA under  
          certain conditions (Section 21080.23).

          This bill addresses concerns of the author and sponsor over  
          biogas from dairies by (1) providing that a biogas pipeline  
          for biogas from dairies in Fresno, Kern, Kings, or Tulare  
          counties is covered under the current eight-mile pipeline  
          exemption (Section 21080.23), (2) defining "biogas," (3)  
          requiring compliance with local, state, and federal laws,  
          and (4) setting a January 1, 2013 sunset so that the use of  
          this exemption can be evaluated.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  Yes

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/19/09)

          Kern County Board of Supervisors (source)
          Sierra Club California


          TSM:mw  5/20/09   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****