BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                                       



           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
          |SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 657|
          |Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
          |1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
          |(916) 651-1520         Fax: (916) |                         |
          |327-4478                          |                         |
           ------------------------------------------------------------ 
           
                                         
                                 THIRD READING


          Bill No:  SB 657
          Author:   Steinberg (D)
          Amended:  6/1/09
          Vote:     21

           
           SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE  :  3-2, 4/21/09
          AYES:  Corbett, Florez, Leno
          NOES:  Harman, Walters


          SUBJECT  :    Human trafficking

           SOURCE  :     Alliance to Stop Slavery and End Trafficking


           DIGEST  :    This bill, among other things, beginning January  
          1, 2011, requires retail sellers and manufacturers doing  
          business in the state to develop, maintain, and implement  
          policies related to their compliance with federal and state  
          law regarding the eradication of slavery and human  
          trafficking from their supply chain.

           ANALYSIS  :    Existing federal law establishes the crimes of  
          kidnapping in interstate or foreign commerce, peonage,  
          slavery and trafficking in persons, and provides for  
          criminal and civil penalties. 

          Existing federal law, the Victims of Trafficking and  
          Violence Protection Act of 2000, acknowledges the crime of  
          human trafficking, and delineates various federal actions  
          to combat trafficking, punish perpetrators, and provides  
          services to victims of trafficking.  
                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 657
                                                                Page  
          2


          Existing state law makes human trafficking a crime.  

          Existing state law, the California Trafficking Victims  
          Protection Act, allows a victim of human trafficking to  
          bring a civil action for actual damages, compensatory  
          damages, punitive damages, injunctive relief, or any other  
          appropriate relief.  

          Existing state law generally regulates various business  
          activities and practices, including those of retail sellers  
          and manufacturers of products.  

          This bill, beginning January 1, 2011, requires retail  
          sellers and manufacturers doing business in the state to  
          develop, maintain, and implement policies related to their  
          compliance with federal and state law regarding the  
          eradication of slavery and human trafficking from their  
          supply chain.

          This bill requires that the policy be posted on the retail  
          seller's or manufacturer's Internet website and be made  
          available in writing upon request by a consumer. 

          This bill requires the policy, at a minimum, include these  
          two elements:  (1) that the company and all suppliers in  
          its supply chain will comply with the laws regarding  
          slavery and human trafficking in the countries in which  
          they do business, and (2) that where slavery and human  
          trafficking is found in its supply chain, it will seek  
          eradication rather than ceasing business in that area.

          This bill exempts retail sellers or manufacturers having  
          less than $2 million in annual sales.

          This bill provides that the exclusive remedy for a  
          violation of the bill's provisions shall be an action  
          brought by the Attorney General for injunctive relief, but  
          would not limit remedies that may be sought for violation  
          of other state or federal laws.

          This bill makes legislative findings and declarations  
          regarding the eradication of slavery and human trafficking.  


                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 657
                                                                Page  
          3


           Prior Legislation
           
          SB 1649 (Steinberg), 2007-08 Session, was substantively  
          similar to this bill.  The bill passed the Senate with a  
          vote of 23-15 on May 15, 2008, but died in the Assembly  
          Appropriations Committee.   

          SB 180 (Kuehl), Chapter 239, Statutes of 2005, established  
          the California Alliance to Combat Trafficking and Slavery  
          (California ACTS) Task Force.

          AB 22 (Lieber), Chapter 240, Statutes of 2005, established  
          civil and criminal penalties for human trafficking and  
          allowed for forfeiture of assets derived from human  
          trafficking.

           FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  Yes    
          Local:  No

           SUPPORT  :   (Verified  1/5/10)

          Alliance to Stop Slavery and End Trafficking (source)
          California Commission on the Status of Women
          California Labor Federation
          California School Employees Association
          California Teamsters Public Affairs Council
          Coalition to Abolish Slavery and Trafficking
          Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office
          Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, Inc

           OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  1/5/10)

          California Chamber of Commerce
          California Grocers Association
          California Independent Grocers Association
          California Manufacturers and Technology Association
          California Retailers Association
          Grocery Manufacturers Association
          National Federation of Independent Business

           ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    According to the author's office,  
          the primary goal of this bill is to highlight the existence  
          of slave-labor and human trafficking throughout California,  

                                                           CONTINUED





                                                                SB 657
                                                                Page  
          4

          and to create an opportunity for California retailers and  
          manufacturers to demonstrate leadership in eradicating  
          human trafficking from their supply chains.  Additionally,  
          with the information required of businesses, this bill  
          empowers consumers to reward companies that proactively  
          work to eradicate slave-labor and human trafficking.

           ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    The California Grocers  
          Association writes:  "While grocers do not support slavery,  
          human trafficking or abusive treatment of workers, the bill  
          poses several difficulties.  SB 657 would require all  
          companies to develop policies with regard to its entire  
          supply chain, which can include entities far outside the  
          borders of California or the United States.  Grocers do not  
          have the resources to monitor supplier employment  
          practices, nor do they have the authority to enforce state  
          or federal labor law with regard to suppliers.  Further,  
          the bill requires posting of policies on a company's  
          internet web site but provides no details as to what  
          constitutes compliance with the requirement or how it  
          applies to retailers that do not have an internet web  
          site."


          RJG:mw  1/5/10   Senate Floor Analyses 

                         SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                                ****  END  ****
















                                                           CONTINUED